|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Failure to Prosecute Infringers Will LEad to Loss of Trademark Rights
|
| Guest post by: David M. Adler |
Article Overview: Generally speaking, trademark rights in the United States arise in the context of use. Use or acts by others which evidence non-use jeopardize those rights and are legally analyzed as “abandonment.” An “abandoned” mark has fallen into the public domain and is free for adoption and use by others. Abandonment can take various forms. This article discusses the failure to prosecute infringers.
![]() |
Free Download - Failure to Prosecute Infringers Will LEad to Loss of Trademark Rights By David M. Adler |
Failure to Prosecute Infringers Will LEad to Loss of Trademark Rights
While
the failure of a trademark owner to prosecute third-party infringers has been
characterized by some courts as evidence of abandonment, the more
readily-ascertainable harm is a gradual erosion of a mark’s distinctiveness,
e.g. the power of the mark to identify a particular source of good or service.
Third-party use causes the mark to become “weaker” because it appears to
coexist within an increasingly “crowded field” of other similar marks.
The other harm
is “tarnishment,” the mental association of the mark with inferior or offensive
products or services. Continued unabated,
third-party infringers will eventually cause the mark to lose all
strength as a distinctive symbol of source, having the same effect as an
abandonment. What’s worse, so weakened, a mark-owner would be powerless stop
future infringers, losing any goodwill
associated with the mark. Courts, as a matter of policy, have hesitated to hold
trademark owners to a strict policy of pursuing every potential infringer: “an
owner is not required to act immediately against every possible infringing use
in order to avoid a holding of abandonment. *** Such a requirement would
unnecessarily clutter the courts.” Wallpaper
Mfrs., Ltd. v. Crown Wallcovering
Corp., 680 F.2d 755, 766.
How
do mark owners protect against third-party use? Monitoring. Trademark
monitoring involves periodic policing of State and Federal trademark databases
for applications to register marks as well as policing the Internet for actual
use. By monitoring Federal trademark application activity, mark owners can
properly object to third party registrations during the statutory, thirty-day
“Opposition Period.” By monitoring Internet activity, owners can identify and
address risks early, before extensive customer confusion can occur and before
the third party as invested money to promote the mark, making an early
settlement more difficult.
Opposition.
An “opposition”
is a proceeding in which one party is seeking to prevent registration of another party's trademark. Under the law,
if a party believes that she will be damaged by the registration of a mark, she
can file an opposition.
Often, a
trademark application is opposed by someone who owns prior rights in an
identical or similar trademark. Trademark
applications may be challenged on any other substantive requirements for
trademark registration, such as descriptiveness, deceptive misdescriptiveness,
genericness, functionality, dilution.
Cancellation.
A
cancellation is a proceeding in which a party seeks to cancel an existing
registration of a mark. Under the law, a person who believes he will be damaged
by the registration may file a petition to cancel.
Please
feel free to contact us to discuss the scope and availability of the firm’s
trademark monitoring services.
|
About the Author: David M. Adler RSS for David's articles - Visit David's website David is an attorney, entrepreneur and recognized speaker on intellectual property, media & entertainment, and technology law with a practice focused on counseling businesses across the interrelated areas of Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment, Information Technology and Business Law. He provides legal counsel on trademark and copyright clearance, registration and enforcement, digital & new media licensing, production, finance, regulations, litigation and corporate-commercial transactions. He has a law degree from the DePaul College of Law (’97) where he wrote for the DePaul Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. He received a Bachelor of the Arts in English and a Bachelor of the Arts in History from Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana. Mr. Adler is currently an Adjunct Professor teaching Music Law at DePaul College of Law. He created and taught an undergraduate course on E-Business in the Arts, Entertainment & Media Management Department of Columbia College Chicago, formerly chaired the Chicago Bar Association's Media & Entertainment Law Committee and previously chaired the Start-up and Entrepreneurial Ventures Subcommittee. Leavens, Strand, Glover & Adler, LLC, 203 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2550 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Toll Free (866) 734-2568 www.lsglegal.com Click here to visit David's website BEWARE OF NOTICES REGARDING YOUR TRADEMARKS Addressing The Risks of Doing Business Online Types of legal business structures Copyright Basics TRADEMARKS IN CYBERSPACE |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



