|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Battle Over Health Care Reform Now Reaches U.S. Supreme Court
|
| Guest post by: Julio Portilla |
Article Overview: The battle over health care reform has now reached the Supreme Court. The petition that has been filed may be at the leading edge of a wave of litigation over the controversial legislation. It is challenging a June 29th ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit that upheld the so-called “individual mandate” under the landmark health care legislation.
![]() |
Free Download - Top 5 Tips Before You File A Lawsuit By Julio Portilla |
Battle Over Health Care Reform Now Reaches U.S. Supreme Court
The battle over federal
health care reform is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Thomas More Law
Center today announced that it had filed its petition for certiorari in Thomas
More Law Center v. Obama, its challenge to a June 29 ruling by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the 6th Circuit that upheld the so-called “individual mandate”
under the landmark health care legislation. That provision of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act requires individuals to purchase at least
minimum health care insurance coverage.
“Review is necessary to
establish a meaningful limitation on congressional power under the Commerce
Clause,” the petition argues. “If the Act is understood to fall within Congress’s
Commerce Clause authority, the federal government will have absolute and
unfettered power to create complex regulatory schemes to fix every perceived
problem imaginable and to do so by ordering private citizens to engage in
affirmative acts, under penalty of law.”
As examples, the brief
asserts that if the individual mandate is upheld in the health care arena,
government would feel free to order citizens to take vitamins, join health
clubs, or buy General Motors cars.
The petition may be at
the leading edge of a wave of litigation over the controversial legislation,
challenging the first of several expected appeals court rulings in coming
months.
Because the 6th Circuit
is the only appeals court that has ruled thus far, the petition could not make
what is usually the strongest argument for review by the Supreme Court.
Instead, the brief cites
a rule of the Supreme Court suggesting that review is appropriate when “a
United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law
that has not, but should be, settled by this Court.”
The petition cites the
line of cases mainly from the Rehnquist Court seeking to limit the power of
Congress under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. Those precedents, the
petition states, mean that “before Congress can reach you through the Commerce
Clause, you must be engaged in some affirmative activity.”
Two of the three members
of the 6th Circuit panel agreed, for different reasons, that the government had
made a plausible case that the individual mandate is constitutional because an
individual’s decision not to obtain health coverage has economic consequences.
The judges were Boyce Martin and Jeffrey Sutton. Sutton’s opinion has been
viewed as especially important because he is a respected conservative judge
who, as appellate lawyer, often argued in favor of state sovereignty. The
dissenting judge in the 6th Circuit case was Ohio U.S. District Court Judge
James Graham, sitting by designation.
The
petition was filed by Thomas Muise of the Ann Arbor, Michigan-based More
Center. David Yerushalmi of the Law Offices of David Yerushalmi in Chandler,
Arizona, was also on the brief. Following a reply by the Obama administration,
the case would likely be weighed by the justices at the Court’s private
conference in late September, though it could also consider the petition during
the summer recess.
Referred by: http://www.3MMediaGroup.com
|
About the Author: Julio Portilla RSS for Julio's articles - Visit Julio's website Julio Portilla has been a legal expert on CNN, the New York Daily News and amNewYork. He specializes in bankruptcy, immigration and entrepreneurial law.
Julio Portilla is a member of the New York State Bar Association, Brooklyn Bar Association, New York County Lawyers Association, New York Criminal and Civil Court Bar Association, Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Queens County Bar Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Bankruptcy Bar Association, Hispanic Bar Association and the American Bar Association.
Julio Portilla Law Firm represents people and corporations in civil and commercial litigation in the state of New York and in federal courts. Click here to visit Julio's website Top 5 Tips Before You File A Lawsuit Instructions on Filing for Bankruptcy in New York Filing an Emergency Bankruptcy Petition Battle Over Health Care Reform Now Reaches US Supreme Court Top3 Immigration Myths |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
The Pure FUN of Learning & Using NLP
Stay Employed In A Down Economy
International Employment Background Checks
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



