Tweet

Is a fiery temperament the no 1 must have quality for great leadership

Guest post by: Andrew Rondeau

Article Overview: Alexander the Great died at the age of 32. But before his untimely death he had lead his armies to conquer the Achaemenid Persian Empire, adding it to Macedon’s European territories. It seems this was much of the world then known to the ancient Greeks. That story of conquered lands may make Alexander the Great one of the more successful leaders in recorded history.

Is a fiery temperament the no 1 must have quality for great leadership

Alexander the Great died at the age of 32. But before his untimely death he had lead his armies to conquer the Achaemenid Persian Empire, adding it to Macedon's European territories. It seems this was much of the world then known to the ancient Greeks. That story of conquered lands may make Alexander the Great one of the more successful leaders in recorded history.

What were his qualities?

As a person he was known to have a violent temper and a rash, impulsive nature. He was also extremely stubborn and only his most respected advisors could persuade him to change his mind.

He was incredibly competitive. Towards the last years of his life these strong character traits of having to be right at all times and flaring up in temper if not listened to developed into megalomania. He felt he was a deity and expected his subjects to treat him as such.

Yet he achieved greatness beyond comprehension.

Attila the Hun - a Great Leader?

Attila the Hun - a Great Leader?

Attila the Hun was the leader of the Hunnic Empire which stretched from Germany to the Ural River and from the River Danube to the Baltic Sea. This was a fair size stretch of land.

What distinguished him from other leaders was his excessive cruelty. He was feared by all. He had a fiery temperament and he was known for his inordinate greed. In terms of these characteristics he seems to be joined by Genghis Khan and Timur.

All three cruel leaders were known for their fiery temperament and extraordinary power to be cruel. There are some writings that question these characteristics. One would imagine it could also depend on which side one was writing from.

Those who had been conquered could be considered to be less than objective in their assessment of the character traits of these huge leaders whereas those taking part in the conquering might look on their leaders with greater favour.

Whoever might be correct in their assessment of these great army leaders, one thing is for certain their achievements during their times are enormous.

During times where the horse was the mode of transport and the foot soldiers were literally on foot, these men led their troops to battle and won their way across countries and continents.

Their leadership style seemed to be through using their fiery temperament to push through their will and their instructions. Not many of their subordinates were prepared to incur the wrath of their leaders as it appears that commands were enforced through fear.

Leaders may therefore also be successful in leading their people even if they are prone to irrational and fiery outbursts. This is not a characteristic which would necessarily be tolerated in modern management manuals.

In fact modern managers might find themselves at risk of being taken to labour court and accused of wrong doing.

Yet these leaders were highly effective and the results they achieved certainly speak for the fact that their management style worked. One might say that wars and the societies these leaders lived through could require such a style. But then wars and doing business are not necessarily that divorced from each other.

What experience do you have with fiery managers?

Related Articles
  Is total control the no 1 must have quality for great leadership?
  People Like To Do Business With People Who Are Like Them - Part 1
  Eight Essential Qualities of Passionate, Powerful and Proven Leaders, According To Your Strategic Thinking Business Coach
  What Is The Meaning Of Leadership?
  Selling to 4 Personality Types - A Lesson in Sales Psychology

Article Tags: develop management skills, management skill set, manager competencies, manager skill



Related Forum Posts
Pitching without getting Poached - Hi Kevin, This is a great question and one I get ALOT! The short answer is a non disclosure agreement with a strict confidentiality clause and non-compete. Sadly, it doesnt always work. I recently hired a copywriter to edit some of my women's leadership work - and now I find out she is speaking on Women's leadership to my own Women's group. Eek! In any case, I'm the expert so I doubt it will go far. You do need to be careful and follow your gut on who to trust and how much information to share. Most people are honourable but you do need to cover your butt. J
Key Components - Two key components for success in network marketing are passion and leadership. As others have said, you have to believe in, or be passionate about, what you are selling. But, just as important, is the development of leadership skills. People want to work with a leader -- someone who can show them the way. So you must take the time to study and become a leader if you want to meet with real success in the network marketing industry.
Re: Does Your Blog Attract People Who Want Marketing Info? - We contacted a lot of business, marketing, coaching and leadership blogs from the blog list here on the Evan Carmichael website. There are some great resources there that every one should look at. Donna
Re: What is your biggest challenge? Today? - [quote="Alan Mater":36n2n9wd]The question of quality comes into play at this point. [/quote:36n2n9wd] Yeah quality is often correlated with price, but paying more won't always guarantee higher quality. If you look around there is a huge amount of great writing talent that work at good prices. I was once one of those writers (started at $3/post) before I eventually ended up doing my own thing. The internet has empowered almost anyone to become a writer very easily, which has opened up the job market, pushing down prices considerably.
Re: Blog entries... how many is too much? - I guess it all depends on what the audience he already has wants and the plans he has for the future. I see what you’re saying about breaking it up over three blogs but I personally feel that keeping all in one place helps everyone. For instance when I start learning about a new subject I will still read articles that I know will go way over my head, simply because I can start piecing information together. You can switch that round for topics I feel I’m an expert in, I still read article on subjects I already know about, often it can be a great refresher or give you a new perspective of something you’ve known for a long time. So in that respect I’d be tempted to keep it all on one blog. With regards to doing three posts a day I think it’s a good idea but ONLY if all the posts are of the same quality. I think by tripling your work you may start rushing and providing less good quality articles and as the old adage goes its quality not quantity that will win out in the end. But if he can keep the same quality the more content the better as there are more posts that will rank in Google therefore potentially bringing in more visitors.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Build Corporate Credit for Your Small Business

How to Set Sales Goals that Work

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.