|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Effects-Based Thinking: Part II
|
| Guest post by: James Murphy |
Article Overview: In 'Effects-Based Thinking - Part I', the definition of effects-based thinking, or EBT, was established as an approach to strategic planning, which contributes to long-lasting organizational impacts. Expanding on this concept, we can view the differences between strategic planning with EBT and simply tracking progress with metrics. With EBT, we're able to construct, align and adapt our measurements to ensure success within the organization.
![]() |
Free Download - X-Gap: Using Strategic Planning to Close the Project Execution By James Murphy |
Effects-Based Thinking: Part II
In 'Effects-Based Thinking - Part I', the definition of effects-based
thinking, or EBT, was established as an approach to strategic planning
which contributes to long-lasting organizational impacts. Expanding on
this concept, let's look at what the differences between strategic
planning with EBT and simply tracking progress with metrics are.
Many organizations utilize scoreboards or dashboards to track progress
toward goals. Such methods have values that can be measured in a
continuous manner to track performance. But such tools are just that -
measures of performance toward discreet objectives, but not necessarily a
component of effects-based thinking. These objectives do not always
have a clear connection to the organization's overarching goals or
vision that one gets with EBT. For example, making a certain amount of
revenue or delivering a particular earnings per share by the end of the
year are great measurements. How are we going to know whether the
actions we are taking today and tomorrow are having the right effects
upon those measurements? How can we utilize effects-based thinking to
know that we aren't just getting lucky? Furthermore, how do we even
know that those measurements are the right measurements? And how
do we know that the sum of the individual actions taken to affect these
measurements, which often form the basis of incentive systems, are not
interfering with each other or ultimately damaging the organization?
This is where effects-based thinking or EBT comes into play.
Every organization is a complex system that is typically composed of
smaller complex systems that are interdependent. Interdependencies
between complex systems are unpredictable and can create unintended
effects or consequences. So, the lesson to learn is that scoreboards
and dashboards alone are not necessarily good indicators of progress
toward achieving organizational goals.
So, how do we manage organizations in uncertainty? We do it by first
developing an understanding of effects-based thinking (EBT) throughout
an organization. Do the people at the lowest levels of the organization
have an understanding of the organization's overarching goals in order
to make the right decisions? Do they have the freedom to exercise
judgment? Do they have access to the information they need to make
those judgments? What about the middle managers - do they have the
necessary understanding of goals and freedom of action to use
effects-based thinking in the organization's best interest?
Furthermore, whether they make the right or the wrong decision, are they
learning from it and transferring that learning horizontally and
vertically throughout your organization with EBT? Lastly, are the
organization's senior leaders learning from what the junior leaders are
learning in order to adjust the organization's course and strategic
direction? To do all these things and remain agile in order to adapt to
the precarious changes in complex environments requires effects-based
thinking.
Everything exists within a system and every component of the system has
the ability to affect everything else, as these components are
interdependent. Central to EBT is this notion that effects transmit
through systems in three orders: kinetic, second order, and third order.
Impacts and Kinetic Effects in EBT
Think about actions in EBT as "impacts." Impacts are the actions taken
or an event that has occurred that causes the rippling effects that
cascade throughout the larger system. These impacts are "kinetic"
effects. Kinetic effects in effects-based thinking are measureable and
immediate. Typically, then, kinetic effects are localized. The effect
remains within or close to the originating system or transmits merely to
the neighboring systems. Kinetic effects have a tendency to be a small
step toward some larger objective.
Second Order Effects in EBT
Second order effects connect the very actionable, controllable, and
immediately measurable kinetic effects to the long-term organizational
goals that affect the much larger market or global system. Within
effects-based thinking, second order effects are those that have a
significant impact on the primary systems that comprise the overall
system. That is, they correspond to an organization's individual
strategic objectives. Because second order effects have a much longer
range than kinetic effects in EBT, they typically only manifest
themselves over a period of months or even years, and present a
challenge to measurement.
At the level of second order effects, complexity sets in and it isn't
always clear what might be affecting the success or failure of strategic
objectives. Measurements may or may not be relevant to those objectives
so paramount in effects-based thinking. So, the effects that we want
at the second order of EBT must first be described as desired effects
in a simple, clear manner before we attach measurements to them. We
must also always hold the desired effect as primary over the
measurements and continually ask ourselves whether the measurements are
indeed a reflection of progress toward the desired effect. If we can't
make that connection, then what is the compelling reason to keep doing
what we are doing? Are our actions in effects-based thinking achieving
our desired effect?
So, EBT's second order effects are the culmination of a few or many
kinetic effects. They most likely align with an organization's
strategic goals. Therefore, scoreboards and dashboards of a few
carefully selected metrics can be excellent tools for assessing success.
But there is another, higher order of effects that can't be ignored -
third order effects.
Third Order Effects in EBT
In EBT, third order effects describe an organization's future picture.
A future picture is similar to the popular notion of a company's
vision. But specific to effects-based thinking, a future picture is a
high-resolution description of some future state of the organization.
It is the set of long-range goals that the strategy seeks to attain.
When we speak of 'ripple effects' we are often thinking in terms of
third order effects. The set of effects, expected and unexpected, that
ultimately arise as a function of activity over a long period of time -
on the order of several years - is the domain of third order effects.
The future picture is the set of effects we want to bring into existence
with EBT. Other third order effects, whether created by entities
outside the organization or by the unforeseeable consequences of actions
taken within the organization, are what we must guard against.
These three levels of effects in effects-based thinking - kinetic,
second order, and third order - provide a structure for thinking in
terms of planning, executing, and assessing an organization's activity
within complex environments. Effects-based thinking helps guide
organizations through such complexity and adapt to its constant changes
and challenges with greater caution. But, perhaps even more
importantly, EBT provides everyone in that organization with a simple
structure to guide and align their actions towards long-range success.
When we bear in mind our ultimate goals when planning and executing
toward immediate or short-range results, we utilize effects-based
thinking to align our actions more effectively toward those ultimate
goals. With EBT, we're also able to better construct, align, and adapt
our measurements to ensure we aren't measuring the wrong things or,
worse, driving the wrong behaviors.
Article Tags: EBT, effectsbased thinking
|
About the Author: James Murphy RSS for James's articles - Visit James's website James D. Murphy, the founder and CEO of Afterburner, Inc., has a unique, powerful mix of leadership skills in both the military and business worlds. After graduating from the University of Kentucky, Murphy joined the U.S. Air Force where he learned to fly the F-15. He has logged over 1,200 hours as an instructor pilot in the F-15 and has accumulated over 3,200 hours of flight time in other high-performance jet aircraft and has flown missions to Central America, Asia, Central Europe and the Middle East. As Afterburner's leadership keynote speaker, Murphy has helped top business leaders transform strategy into action. Realizing that the concepts of the Flawless Execution(SM) model could be applied to strategic business planning, he engaged the proven model - "Plan. Brief. Execute. Debrief." Through his leadership, Afterburner has landed on Inc. Magazine's "Inc. 500 List" twice. Murphy has been regularly featured in such publications as The Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek, and Newsweek. For more information on Afterburner, Inc., please call 877-765-5607 or visit www.afterburnerconsulting.com. Click here to visit James's website Project Execution through Successful Leadership How to Lead Like a Fighter Pilot Simplicity and Elegance Expressing Your Core Competencies The Value of Military Leadership Experience in Turbulent Business Environments Executive Coaching and Debriefing for Corporate Leadership Development Programs Collaborative Leadership A Process for Success in a Turbulent World |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Log On
BUILDING A HIGH PERFORMING TEAM
Work at Home Moms and Their Bad Rap?
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



