|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Strategic Planning and Effects-Based Thinking: Part 1
|
| Guest post by: James Murphy |
Article Overview: In strategic planning and decision making, effects-based thinking (EBT) is a vital tactic to assess the effects of specific actions, not in a narrowly defined and time-limited way, but through a perspective that is sensitive to broad-ranging and lasting impacts. In our fast-paced personal and work lives, we tend to think more about today's issues rather than tomorrow's - but effects-based thinking is the opposite of short-sightedness.
![]() |
Free Download - X-Gap: Using Strategic Planning to Close the Project Execution By James Murphy |
Strategic Planning and Effects-Based Thinking: Part 1
As the name implies, effects-based thinking (EBT) is an approach to
strategic planning and decision making where the effects of specific
actions are assessed, not in a narrowly defined and time-limited way,
but through a perspective that is sensitive to broad-ranging and lasting
impacts. Effects-based thinking is the opposite of short-sightedness
or myopia.
Sadly, we have the ability to think about effects, yet we often don't.
In our fast-paced personal and work lives we tend to think more about
today's issues rather than tomorrow's. Strategic planning objectives
get pushed back further and further to accommodate those immediate
concerns. Modern organizations tend to exacerbate our naturally myopic
tendencies by planning in small executive teams and passing down
narrowly defined objectives and goals with little connectedness to
overall goals. Ironically, narrow strategic planning sparks our natural
capacity for effects-based thinking. In the wake of some failed
corporate plan, the water cooler conversations buzz with effects-based
criticisms like, "Didn't they realize that was going to happen?" or "I
saw that coming a mile away."
To some extent we are all effects-based thinkers. If you ever said to
yourself, "I'm not going to stay up to watch the rest of this game
because I won't get enough sleep and I have a busy day tomorrow." Or,
if you decided to enroll in graduate school to get an MBA so that you
would have better career options, then you are certainly thinking about
effects. In this sense, effects-based thinking is a fundamental human
trait in our strategic planning processes. We envision some future or
some goal, or we analyze some set of choices or actions and we think
forward through a chain of cause and effect to make decisions. Thinking
about effects is part of our nature as humans.
However, few individuals or organizations utilize effects-based thinking
systemically. Such an organized, process-oriented approach is what we
mean by effects-based thinking. We partially define effects-based
thinking as strategic planning and decision-making directed to shape an organization's picture of the future.
This is only a partial definition because we must additionally
consider what we know about complex systems - that they are inherently
unpredictable and subject to rapid, even destructive change.
Furthermore, actions can produce unpredictable effects and unintended
consequences within complex systems - even with a comprehensive
strategic planning initiative. In complexity, the cause and effect
sequence will always have some degree of ambiguity. Unfortunately,
we're stuck with the fact that no person or group of people has
completely reliable predictive abilities about complex systems. We also
know that within complex systems, root causes of effects can be obscure.
So, even with the benefit of hindsight, we may not know precisely what
forces are at work to yield any given effect. Therefore, we must be
ever vigilant about what is happening around us. We must also
continually assess cause and effect in our internal and external
systems. Effects-based thinking is about more than just strategic
planning by mentally projecting through a series of causes and effects.
It is also about assessing the effectiveness and accuracy of our
predictive planning. To truly think in an effects-based way requires us
to think cyclically rather than linearly.
To be more accurate, effects-based thinking can be defined as a
continuum of strategic planning and assessing the effectiveness of
actions directed to shape an organization's overall goals and objectives.
In other words it's "how do we get what we want and how do we know
we're making the right choices to get it". And that seems pretty simple
and straightforward if it were not for this pesky problem within most
organizations known as "execution".
Organizations create plans that span the course of years. They call
these plans "strategies." But leaders in organizations struggle to
coordinate or orchestrate the execution of these strategies and utilize
effects-based thinking. One of the many reasons for this is that the
strategic planning is often not well connected to the operational plans,
or what military planners call "tactical plans." The strategic plan
often spans a period of years while the tactical plans may only span a
period of days, weeks or a month. There is a missing strategic planning
tier needed to bridge that gap - one that spans the multiple-month to
multiple-year gap. Without effects-based thinking, the plans we carry
out on a daily basis are hard to connect to the overall strategy that
spans a year or more. In that case then, how do you measure your
progress in support of the strategy? And, even more importantly in this
rapidly changing complex world, how do we know our strategy is still a
viable one? Complex phenomena obscure our ability to determine whether
our chosen course is correct. So, what do we do? Do we just keep
plugging along for months or even years until it becomes painfully
obvious that our strategy is ineffective or needs adjustment, and then employ effects-based thinking?
In 2010, IBM produced a report about strategic planning called Capitalizing on Complexity.
This report clearly outlined the challenges of operating in a highly
complex world, what it called a "global system of systems." In its
conclusions, it made several recommendations, all of which agree with
the fundamental assumptions inherent in Flawless Execution. But one in
particular speaks directly to effects-based thinking. The report
instructs the reader to: "Course correct as needed. Align a few
clear metrics with objectives to identify success patterns, then
regularly track results as part of a continual feedback loop. Modify
actions based on what is learned (1)."
Effects-based thinking is about realizing that the strategic
planning-executing continuum must be continuously revised to keep pace
with change. It can only do this by continually assessing the effects
of actions taken and the uncontrollable changes taking place in the
market or external environment.
To understand how to implement effects-based thinking into our planning
requires a deeper understanding of effects and how they propagate
throughout complex systems. We also need processes to help us think
more clearly in terms of effects. To that end, a subsequent series of
articles will explore effects-based thinking and how it impacts
strategic planning. Through that series we will explore a three-tiered
model of effects-based thinking. We will also explore line-of-sight
alignment, a concept that connects everyone in the organization to their
immediate objectives and the long-range organizational strategic goals -
all through a dedication to effects-based thinking.
Works Cited
1. Capitalizing on Complexity. IBM Corporation 2010. Pg 59.
Article Tags: effectsbased thinking, strategic planning
|
About the Author: James Murphy RSS for James's articles - Visit James's website James D. Murphy, the founder and CEO of Afterburner, Inc., has a unique, powerful mix of leadership skills in both the military and business worlds. After graduating from the University of Kentucky, Murphy joined the U.S. Air Force where he learned to fly the F-15. He has logged over 1,200 hours as an instructor pilot in the F-15 and has accumulated over 3,200 hours of flight time in other high-performance jet aircraft and has flown missions to Central America, Asia, Central Europe and the Middle East. As Afterburner's leadership keynote speaker, Murphy has helped top business leaders transform strategy into action. Realizing that the concepts of the Flawless Execution(SM) model could be applied to strategic business planning, he engaged the proven model - "Plan. Brief. Execute. Debrief." Through his leadership, Afterburner has landed on Inc. Magazine's "Inc. 500 List" twice. Murphy has been regularly featured in such publications as The Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek, and Newsweek. For more information on Afterburner, Inc., please call 877-765-5607 or visit www.afterburnerconsulting.com. Click here to visit James's website Execute Rhythm in Six Steps with an EasytoImplement Strategic Planning Process Complexity The Execution Challenge You Dont See Project Execution through Successful Leadership How to Lead Like a Fighter Pilot Execution Rhythm Encourages Effective Business Communication EffectsBased Thinking Part II |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Attracting Passionate Employees
Quick Tips on Buying a Business
Four Reasons Why Entrepreneurs Should Blog
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



