|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Besting Your Plan’s Performance: The Time To Start 2012 Strategic Planning is Now
|
| Guest post by: Joe Evans |
Article Overview: Corporate plan management is a day-to-day and week-by-week activity. The long-held belief that strategic plans are addressed once a year serves to obfuscate the ever-green nature of what plans really represent. They require a switch in our mindset away from treating strategic planning as if it were a project. Instead, it is an ongoing journey that requires us to recheck our position against the map frequently to avoid getting lost.
![]() |
Free Download - How Well Do You Understand Your Organization’s Core Competencies? By Joe Evans |
Besting Your Plan’s Performance: The Time To Start 2012 Strategic Planning is Now
You Should Be Getting Year-Over-Year Performance Increases
If plan governance isn’t instilled as a core element of the executive
team’s reality, focus on accomplishing strategy wains quickly. Why?
Because time flies past rapidly and organizations face so many daily
distractions that the interference begins to blur the big picture for
all but the most focused executives. Ideally, strategic plans should be
refreshed quarterly, updated annually and rewritten every three years.
It should be an ongoing part of business operations to re-check against
plan goals and objectives.
Corporate plan management is a
day-to-day and week-by-week activity. The long-held belief that
strategic plans are addressed once a year serves to obfuscate the
ever-green nature of what plans really represent. They require a switch
in our mindset away from treating strategic planning as if it were a
project. Instead, it is an ongoing journey that requires us to recheck
our position against the map frequently to avoid getting lost.
Strategic Planning Is Not An Annual Project
Much
like humans, corporations get distracted and can lose energy and focus.
A condition similar to Attention Deficit Disorder (A-D-D) can afflict
companies and infuse busy, yet non-strategic activity and behavior
throughout the ranks of the organization. In the world of sports,
coaches develop detailed game plans in advance of each competition and
drill their teams on the roles and expectations of each position to
accomplish the plan’s outcomes. The players are responsible for knowing
their roles before game time and are accountable to the team to stick
to the plan in the heat of the moment. During the game, when a coach
spots behaviors inconsistent with the game plan, they call a time-out
and huddle the team together to reinforce key messages and reinvigorate
energy and focus within the team. Perhaps the coach spots issues with
the game plan and needs to make on-the-fly adjustments. Another
time-out is called to regroup. The coach uses that moment to let the
players know what is being accomplished by the opponent and how the team
needs to change current game play to address and stop the successful
maneuvers of the opponent. This same type of response is called for in
business, when operational management drifts away from the plan and
allows distractions to effect strategic performance. Certainly our
business strategies are comparable to the coaches game plan in this
analogy. Business is a competition and we must treat it as such. We push
for besting our own previous year’s performance, but we are not
actually in competition with ourselves. We are trying to best our
competitors.
We need a more hands-on and nimble approach to
managing performance related to our strategy execution. This can be
accomplished by restructuring the current strategic plan into fewer and
smaller, but measurable and obtainable goals. The strategy holds
together as a relatively constant baseline...the thread upon which goals
on strung like beads. The organization’s strategic priorities dictate
the order in which elements of the strategy are addressed and even help
to determine the definition of success and how that will be measured.
Consider a restructured plan that involves the following changes:
- Focuses operationally on accomplishing the top 20% of strategic priorities
- Allows for reevaluation of the priorities quarterly and claiming victory on short-term objectives that have been accomplished
- Looks externally to competitor / peer performance benchmarks and factors those inputs into strategic adjustments and operational tactics systematically (allowing the business to push even harder to succeed quarter over quarter)
- Sets the right priorities and clearly communicates the expected actions and results
- Rewards the people that help achieve the results
What if your not doing a good job on formal strategic planning now?
If your business is one of those that falls into the “reactive” category as opposed to “proactive” when it comes to corporate planning, it will take time to gear up and be ready to roll-out a first fully fleshed-out strategic plan. The same is true if your current plan is stale and is going on year three or more in age. Work should begin on the plan at least six months ahead of the strategy launch. Why, you ask? Because the analysis feeding the planning process is crucial and should not be cut short. If you have ever painted your own home, inside or exterior, you know that it takes time to prep before getting into actual painting. In fact, scraping old paint, preparing the surfaces and painstakingly taping all the borders and cut-ins usually takes longer than the actual task of painting.
Since strategic planning models are intended to manage the strategic actions of an organization, a thorough understanding of the current-state provides the foundation on which to build.What does that look like?
Current-state Analysis in Relation to Industry Direction / Momentum
By studying the movement, direction and momentum of the industry or industries served by the organization, the data can feed the strategic planning process leading to better planning decisions. For instance, if the industry data suggests that competitors are enjoying a technological advantage over our firm and that they are steering the industry in a direction that is eroding market our share, what do we do about that? If we cannot dominate, do we leave?
The decision to continue following the market or to break away from the pack will have huge implications on organizational action. When faced with a technological disadvantage such as the one posed here, strategic decisions must be made on possible exits from the market, acquisition of a competitor, partnering, mergers, increased research and development in an attempt to close the competitive gap. All possible strategic actions will have long-term implications - rewards or consequences, therefore the importance of scenario and contingency planning along with risk management and mitigation planning become more and more evident.
Current-state Analysis in Relation to Innovation Efforts/Programs
To avoid lagging behind competitors, organizations must continue to cultivate ideas for improvements to products and services, and then harness the best of the innovations into value-creation enhancements or altogether new offerings. The challenge with innovation in many organizations is framing it into a discipline that can be leveraged. Incentivizing innovation is a step in the right direction, but is only a part of the framework needed to capture, process and act on creative ideas. Such a process should outline how innovation unfolds, starting with the origination of an idea and depicting the steps that lead to its transformation into something useful and that can be implemented.
An evaluation of the current-state of innovation (formal programs or informal frameworks) becomes an essential building block for future strategy enhancements to maintain or improve competitive positioning.
Current-state Analysis in Relations to Organizational Competencies
Core competencies are what make individuals and the organization they constitute special. The competencies are a generic list of skills, and as applied to the employee and the organization then becomes the foundation for what the organization possesses that set it apart from its peers. These groupings of skills are a source for identifying competitive advantage and the building blocks for future opportunities.
Definition: Core Competency - a bundle of skills that enables an organization to provide a particular benefit. A core competence is not product or service specific.
Core competencies are the underpinnings of the organization’s skills that contribute to the development of a range of products and services and the cornerstone of successful strategy, therefore, an objective current-state review of the match-up of core competencies to the organization’s vision, mission and strategy is a must. This data will serve the strategy planning effort after the future-state has been defined, as operational plans will be dependent on closing any gaps that are found to exist.
Current-state Analysis in Relation to Technology
Technology should benefit the business through increased efficiency in the delivery of products and services, leading to a boost in market value and competitive advantage for the organization. Technology strategy must be aligned to corporate goals, so the planning process, as it relates to technology, should help identify, define, and develop both departmental and discrete initiatives that save money, improve quality, and enhance performance. Technology current-state represents another key building block for the strategic actions that will be defined later in the planning process.
Other Inputs
Additionally, strategic priorities for the organization must be identified, formally defined, valued and then prioritized. That is what drives to “future-state” vision of the organization and eventually translate into the corporate strategy. Building upon the current-state analysis, consider the following:
- Are there newly identified strategic priorities related to innovation / research & development?
- Are development programs for management and staff called for to align competencies with the desired future-state?
- Will new state-of-the-art technologies be required to support the organization’s future-state business processes?
Another key point to consider is this. The corporate strategy, when distilled into its pure essence of goodness, must boil down into a manageable small number of goals that then expand back into a number of sub-strategies to accomplish those goals. Managing big and complex is much more difficult than managing smaller and elegantly simple chunks of strategy. Starting early and /or ongoing makes this much easier to accomplish.
There is one more key point to make about getting in front of and controlling the strategic plan development. Assumptions form the basis of those sub-strategies referred to above, and those underlying assumptions must all be fully vetted. Fully vetting strategic assumptions also takes time. It requires allowing those involved with planning to back away from the “givens” and challenge them to ensure we are not assuming the rosiest scenarios on which to base our plan.
You don't manage your projects once a year, so why do it in strategic planning?
The time to begin working on your planning process is now. Strategic and operational planning and management should already be happening year round, so extending to year round planning and governance enhances both the quality of the strategy and the operational effectiveness of executing to the plan. No matter where your organization falls on the continuum of planning sophistication, there are actions required today that are likely not being addressed.
For permission to use or reprint any portions of this copyrighted article, contact Method Frameworks at articles@methodframeworks.com.
About the Author:
Joe Evans is the President and CEO of Method Frameworks. Joe is a published author, frequent speaker and recognized expert in corporate strategic planning. To contact Method Frameworks about scheduling Mr. Evans about an upcoming speaking engagement, visit www.methodframeworks.com/business-speaker or email requests to media_relations@methodframeworks.com.
Download our Guide to Corporate Strategic Planning Our guide to successful strategic planning, called "Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Execution", is a 13 page complimentary resource to help your organization initiate and manage the strategic planning discipline. Your business will richly benefit from the results you can achieve by successfully defining strategy, then linking it to all
aspects of operational execution.
Receive our complimentary guide to successful strategic planning now. Click on the link below and you will receive instant access to "Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Execution" in PDF format. Download now.
Learn More Method Frameworks is a leading business strategy and management consulting company, based in the Dallas / Fort Worth area and serving clients nationally and internationally.
Discover our capabilities and learn why Method Frameworks is the strategic planning partner chosen by Fortune-500 companies and small businesses alike. Let us show you how to realize 140%+ ROI on your strategic planning efforts through our unique Plan4SM process that brings together strategy and execution into a powerful plan. Plan4 is our proprietary business planning process that involves an integrated set of actions designed to help companies gain sustainable advantage. Download our brochure to learn more about Method Frameworks and our services or download our Plan4 Planning Process Overview.
You can contact Method Frameworks at 877-317-5264 (877-31PLAN4) or follow this link to request a meeting with a planning consultant. Check our articles and blog often at www.methodframeworks.com to get many more planning tips and information about our Plan4 process.
Related Articles
Referred by: http://www.imageworksstudio.com/
|
About the Author: Joe Evans RSS for Joe's articles - Visit Joe's website Joe Evans serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Method Frameworks. Method Frameworks provides management consulting services to commercial enterprises with strategic and operational planning solutions using the firm’s proprietary Plan4 process. Visit Method Frameworks at www.methodframeworks.com. Joe is a published author, frequent speaker and recognized expert in co rporate strategic planning. To contact Method Frameworks about scheduling Mr. Evans about an upcoming speaking engagement, visit www.methodframeworks.com/business-speaker or email requests to media_relations@methodframeworks.com. Want more corporate strategic planning insights? Read Joe's blog. Also, request to join the "Strategic Planning Xchange" now by following this link to the Strategic Planning Xchange. Click here to visit Joe's website Strategic Planning Business Executive Essentials Part 2 of 12 Management vs Leadership What Do You Turn To For Transformational Change The Definition of Strategic Planning A White Paper The 2010 Twelvestep Checklist to Help You Evaluate Your Strategic Business Planning Process The Case for Bringing Outside Planning Consultants In |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Are You An Accidental Consultant?
What Is The Foundation for Your Vision?
Is the iPad useful? One CEO tells all ....
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



