|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Where Did "Why" Go?: The Role of Critical Evaluation in Strategic Planning
|
| Guest post by: Joe Evans |
Article Overview: This article explores the importance of critical evaluation in strategy planning and asking, “Why?”.
![]() |
Free Download - How Well Do You Understand Your Organization’s Core Competencies? By Joe Evans |
Where Did "Why" Go?: The Role of Critical Evaluation in Strategic Planning
Why? It is an inquiry we don’t
make often enough. “Why?” is the simplest form of a question, yet when
it is asked, it cannot help but be thought provoking. “Why”, “what if”
and other forms of critical evaluation promote discussion and lead to
improvement in our decision-making process. Even so, we all too often
elect not to use these words from of our repertoire. Instead, they are
often replaced by, “sounds good to me” or some other form of passive
acceptance. We should reflect on the importance of this elegantly
simple but powerful trigger for critical thinking and make sure we do
not allow “why” to become part of a forgotten business vocabulary. This
article explores the importance of critical evaluation in strategy
planning and asking, “Why?”.
Our life lessons and common
sense should be applied within our business lives, day in and day out;
never left at the door when we get to the office. Just think about it.
Whether it is selecting which grade of gasoline to buy or trying to
determine what the difference is between the regular and the “extra
strength” brand variation that costs $.75 more -- we use critical
evaluation in our lives constantly and are good at it. Where we are
less proficient is leveraging this skill to its fullest potential - all
the time. To do so we just need to program it into the decision-making
process to occur systematically so we benefit from our cognitive talents
in all aspects of our lives.
Our strategic planning process
should be leading us through a critical evaluation framework that drives
better decision making. The process should automatically be
challenging the status-quo of the organization in order to drive better
performance through a constructive current-state critical evaluation.
- We’re losing market share. Why?
- Our costs containment strategy is not working. Why?
The strategic planning process should structure critical evaluation and drive questions about current problems in the business or organization and provoke innovation and creativity channeled into addressing performance. Likewise, the strategic planning process should also challenge our collective ideas for the future state vision.
- Is this the right next move? Why?
- We’re not closing new business. Why?
- Are these ideas worth pursuing? Why?
- Is changing it a good idea? Why?
Critical evaluation challenges us to think and improve. All ideas need to be challenged in order to weed out potentially risky or harmful strategies and operational tactics that could have long-term detrimental impacts on the business. Ask, “Why?”
Many times our instincts tell us that something just doesn’t feel right. Do we stop to analyze why, or think about the situation and try to determine what it is that is bothering us about it? Most of us will mull it over until the bothersome element begins to crystallize in our minds and we can then take appropriate action. Conversely, we can sometimes go with a spontaneous “gut feel” - another over-used skill that can get us into trouble. If our gut is sending us a strong message, shouldn’t we in turn be asking ourselves “why”?
This is as true in conjunction with our day-to-day routines as it is in strategic planning. Too often we “accept” mediocre suggestions without truly using critical evaluation to poke at the notion. It is just as damaging to excuse oneself from the decision process by deferring to weigh-in with an opinion or looking away when faced with the opportunity to evaluate data and impact a decision. Stepping forward to contribute is a valuable leadership trait and organizations need leadership.
Critical evaluation is our filtering mechanism to protect us from poor choices. Mistakes will still be made, but with our filter working at 100%, some poor choices will be avoided and bad ideas stopped. The filter is our protection from simply accepting and blindly trusting in consensus or the person speaking the loudest.
In our business world, we not only have the obligation to filter - but also to question, challenge and improve. Despite Enron’s “ask why” tagline, it’s clear that the question wasn’t being asked and answered enough. If only the risky decisions had been averted and the unethical behavior questioned. Instead, a company has disappeared off of the map, and many lives were damaged or ruined. Many bad ideas and poor decisions can be effectively filtered out through systematic critical evaluation.
The Power Duo: “Why” and “What If”
The same is true for seemingly “good” ideas. During strategic planning, good ideas can be made better when challenged and defended. Without critical evaluation applied, how do we know it really is a “good idea”?
Consider the current disaster unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico with the sunken BP deep-water drilling rig. It would seem logical that “actionable” contingency plans would have been in place for the “what if” scenarios. Unfortunately for the Gulf States and BP, whatever contingency plans that may have existed prior to the explosion and massive oil spill, have failed to have an impact thus far. The company would have benefited from more “what if” planning. Better yet, what would BP’s situation have looked like today if better planning efforts and controls had been in place to begin with? Could the disaster have been avoided entirely and lives saved?
The planning process for our business must force such evaluation to take place, systematically. When a thorough planning process is followed, future-state vision and key outcomes go through a critical evaluation and are reviewed against the same evaluation criteria we should be applying to our current-state result.
- Are we satisfied that this the best it can be, at least for now? Why?
- What if we’re wrong on our assumptions?
- What are the scenarios we should plan contingencies for?
Good leaders become great by asking, “why?” They test for weakness in concepts, the conviction behind the ideas and the depth of analysis behind the suggestions.
Our strategic planning processes must provide that same framework for critical evaluation. It must help us select amongst the options available in formulating strategy and provide us with guidance that is true. A good planning process is like a compass that helps us find “true North” and avoid getting lost in the woods.
The planning process should serve us in the identification of the best strategic options. As part of the process, it should aid in the relative valuation of potential strategic outcome choices and help us to prioritize our options from greatest to least beneficial.
Timeframes and Decision Gates: Analysis Coupled with Action
A structured planning process is required to pull us through to the planning conclusion, keeping us from getting lost along the way. To do so effectively, the process must couple the required critical evaluation with the necessary rigor to maintain momentum and take action. Analysis paralysis would likely result in the absence of a process built around established timeframes and decision gates. In strategic planning, at a minimum, we need to take action based on:
- Competitive analysis
- Return on Investment data
- Contingencies / mitigation plans
- Fully vetted assumptions
The Rewards of Critical Evaluation
Our economy needs businesses to thrive. To do so, we as business leaders must continuously strive to mature our organization’s strategic decision process and planning acumen. Our business cultures must encourage free thinking and reward those who constructively challenge, innovate and participate in making our models more successful by asking “why”.
Related Articles
Referred by: http://www.imageworksstudio.com/
|
About the Author: Joe Evans RSS for Joe's articles - Visit Joe's website Joe Evans serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Method Frameworks. Method Frameworks provides management consulting services to commercial enterprises with strategic and operational planning solutions using the firm’s proprietary Plan4 process. Visit Method Frameworks at www.methodframeworks.com. Joe is a published author, frequent speaker and recognized expert in co rporate strategic planning. To contact Method Frameworks about scheduling Mr. Evans about an upcoming speaking engagement, visit www.methodframeworks.com/business-speaker or email requests to media_relations@methodframeworks.com. Want more corporate strategic planning insights? Read Joe's blog. Also, request to join the "Strategic Planning Xchange" now by following this link to the Strategic Planning Xchange. Click here to visit Joe's website To Improve Your Corporate Strategic Planning Efforts Take Clues from NBA Coaches The Change Management Process Accomplishing Change and Making it Stick Can We Trust Our People To Execute Strategic Planning Business Executive Essentials Part 4 of 12 The Truth About Why So Many Strategic Plans Dont Get Executed |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Life, Conflict and Work
The Strong Leadership Formula
Adapting to Technology and the Internet
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



