Tweet

Results are in of a new study...

Written by: Sheryl Strasser

Article Overview: As the head of a large corporation you probably understand that there is a definite need for a corporate rewards program. You realize that although the promise of a paycheck and the possibility of health care might be enough to convince an employee to show up every day for work the same paycheck often isn’t enough for that same employee to put his best foot foreword and dedicate themselves, heart and soul to making the company all it can be. This type of employee does little to increase sale figures or production output, they do not bring out the best in customer service, they aren’t normally good team players, and they certainly don’t make the work place an inviting place which in turn doesn’t inspire perfect attendance.

Results are in of a new study...

The most successful companies are the ones with a supportive customer service team, strong team skills, and a fun inviting work atmosphere. Corporate reward programs are programs designed to help motivate company employees into putting one hundred percent of their effort and energy into their job. Corporate reward programs can be used to reward employee loyalty, an excellent sale record, stellar customer service skills, higher response rates, and years of service. The goals of corporate reward programs are to build morale, establish employee trust/loyalty, develop teamwork, improve customer service, and improve attendance.

Studies have found that corporate reward programs that produce the best results are ones that are quota based. These are programs that reward employees for meeting or even exceeding production goals. When implementing a quota based reward system make sure the goal is achievable but challenging.

Another issue that should be considered when establishing a corporate reward program is the duration of the period. Will it be a short lived affair? Is it going to be a competition that runs for long periods of time? A recent report from the Incentive Foundation showed that programs that ran for short spans of time had poorer results then reward programs that went on for as long as a year.

A side benefit to having a well executed corporate reward program is the attraction it has for new applications. Happy employees are walking talking advertisements. When word gets around that a company has competitive pay, good health insurance, and a top notch corporate reward program the applications will start flooding in.

The Incentive Federation does caution that it is important that a company not get so wrapped up in their rewards program that they loose track of day to day goals and company organization. The value of a strong corporate rewards program can not be undervalued. A recent study found that by implementing a strong rewards program one company was able to improve its productivity and customer satisfaction by forty-four percent.

As the head of a corporation you understand the value of a corporate rewards program. But you are to busy with the day to day details of running a company to be able to set up and establish a good rewards program. If that is the case it might be in your best interest to hire a company who specializes in establishing corporate reward programs.

Related Articles
  Give Change A Chance
  What Is Data Mining ?
  Micro-Start Program: Local Technical Services Provider - Impact Study of the Zakoura Microcredit Program
  The lifeblood of websites.
  Case Study – Create A Great Strategic Alliance

Article Tags: company organization, corporate reward programs, corporate rewards, customer service skills, customer service team, employee loyalty, employee trust, good health, long periods of time, loose track, production goals, response rates, reward employees, reward program, reward system, rewards program, side benefit, stellar customer service, successful companies, work atmosphere



Related Forum Posts
Re: The best place_ - I appreciate the information. Thank you! I’m going to study to finally understand how to do it…
Good God - Celebrity Apprentice - Piers is explaining to Trump the difference between nibbling and biting? My God. This is what TV we have to look forward to?? I wish they would go back to being more business focused and less celebrity focussed. I think moving forward all the teams should donate their proceeds to charity, as an act of tithing. Plus, I would love to have them do a follow up show on all the winners who are now supposed to be working at the Trump organization. One of the things I thought has been missing from day one, Season 1 is a real analysis on what worked and what didnt work in each case study. I know one of the local universities was running a class using the Apprentice as a case study - but that actually would be interesting. I think the teams should have to present their overall strategy and tactics to the executive team and analysis the strengths and weaknesses. Some of our best products have come from our greatest blunders! That would be interesting and I dont think it would compete with Venture. ;0)
Six Degrees of Separation Is Now Three - I got this interesting peice from Techcrunch. Read and Enjoy Six Degrees of Separation Is Now Three Six degrees of separation Is it time to revise the old saw that everyone in the world is connected by just six degrees of separation? A study from French mobile carrier O2 has found that strangers are more connected to each other than they ever have been. According to the study, the average person is now connected by just three degrees within a shared “interest” or social group instead of six. In fact, it found that people are usually a part of three main networks: family, friendship, and work. O2 asked adults across three different age groups — 18-25, 35-45, 55+ — to make contact with random strangers from areas all across the globe using only personal connections. By linking their shared interests, the participants were able to connect to that person in three person-to-person links. Stanley Milgram originally coined the term “six degrees of separation” in 1967 to show that everyone in the modern world was capable of connecting to another by linking people and interests. But in today’s world of social networking, links between strangers are closer than in Milgram’s day. According to Jeff Rodrigues, a social networking specialist that carried out the study, 97 percent of the participants said they felt more connected to people today than they ever have in the past and for older respondents, email and mobile phones were the key factors in reducing the degrees of separation. But for those in the younger generation, Facebook was the main factor. Text messaging was also mentioned as an important component in reducing degrees of separation. “What the study has brought to light is that the way we now interact means it’s never been easier to make connections and build networks of contacts,” Rodrigues said in an interview. It should be noted that the research is not the epitome of a real scientific study—O2 paid for it, after all. And anyone who has a LinkedIn account knows that it is still easy to find plenty of people who are more than three degrees away from you. But the study does underscore something we all know:more so than ever before, everyone is connected (even if it is only tangentially). Maybe it is time to revisit Milgram’s study in a more robust way. It could help silence the critics who believe Facebook and the rest are nothing more than places for kids to waste their time. Let’s face it – how often will you find one service or industry that can totally transform the way people are connected?
Run a major competition - You beat me to the punch LoveInventions! I was just on my way to post this! The idea is simple: run a competition for a major prize to get people posting. In this case Darren put up a $729 Nikon DSLR up for grabs as the top prize. The winner was selected randomly and each post you wrote gave you another chance to win. [quote:1nc4sv0r]The Goal - the aim of the exercise was simple. To sign up new members to my forum and increase page views. My hope was to have a bumper month but also get new members signed up to have an ongoing impact on overall activity going forward.[/quote:1nc4sv0r] [quote:1nc4sv0r]Results: Traffic - Over the full month traffic was increased 66.7%.[/quote:1nc4sv0r] [quote:1nc4sv0r]Results: New Members - Recruiting new members to the forum was another goal of the competition. We’d had an influx in January of 1803 new sign ups as a result of a previous smaller competition but since had been around the 1200 per month. April however saw a boost in numbers by an extra 2823 members.[/quote:1nc4sv0r] [quote:1nc4sv0r]Results: Activity - Another bonus related to increased traffic is the increases in user activity on the forum. Here’s the increase in new ‘threads’ to the forum (up from the 1500’s to just over 4000 for the month). And here is the increase in new posts (up from 1400 per month to over 43000 for the month).[/quote:1nc4sv0r] [quote:1nc4sv0r] The Downside So far it’s sounding fairly rosy isn’t it. Increases in traffic, members, activity and even earning are all good. However there was two downsides. 1. Moderation Workload - I have an amazing team of moderators to DPS but the month of April was the hardest that they’ve ever worked. I totally underestimated the extra load upon them in setting up this competition. It has made me reconsider how I run future competitions. 2. Impact upon Quality of Reader Interaction - over all the increased activity of the site brought in some wonderful new members who are interacting on the site with genuine interaction. However a small number of new members were just there for the competition - even though I made it clear that spammy entries wouldn’t win. This impacted moderators workloads but also the overall morale on the site a little. I think we managed to contain it but again - next time I run a competition it’ll not be based upon post numbers but rather some sort of quality level of interaction.[/quote:1nc4sv0r] What do you guys think? Is it worth testing out? Considering we already give out over $1,000 in month prizes, what would be the ultimate prize that we award at the end of the competition?
Re: Differences between men and women entrepreneurs - Hi Jude, I looked at your website. It looks great and I agree with what you say! I think you have a great concept that will really get women's attention. I hope it helps a lot of women. I wanted to read your article, but I couldn't find a way to read it without signing up for your services. I did like what you wrote about women on your home page though! I too, have noticed women tend to be the hardest on themselves. I think most of us have heard that women usually dress for women, not men. I remember hearing about a study that said women usually scan their competition in the form of other women when they enter a room. They said most women want to know that they are the best woman in the room. That study was on a social scale, but it's still interesting to consider how it might translate to business. Hmmm... just who are women trying to impress anyway? We don't need to compete! If we just learned to accept our own unique talents and chose to see them as great assets, there's no need to impress anyone! When I finally learned this truth and took it to heart, I was freed up to really grow forward! Wishing you all the best! Tami


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

TRADE SHOW FOLLOW-UP: HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?

African Technology Development

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.