Tweet

Chicken Little at NAB

Written by: Andy Marken

Article Overview: When you attend the National Association of Broadcasting (NAB) conference all you see is streaming video, video services, mobile video opportunities. It is a world gone mobile. It is a world gone mad for technical toys. Graphics available upon request.

Chicken Little at NAB

- “Oh my goodness! The sky is falling! I must go tell the king.”
- “Oh no don’t go! The sky is falling!”
- “I know a shortcut to the palace. Come and follow me.”


HD camcorders were beautiful and prices were heading in the right direction at NAB.
Monitors were gorgeous and prices were heading in the right direction. Post production products … ditto. Storage for products in the works was hard drive based. For the finished product it was …aahh either a flavor of blue or flying through the air.

Amid it all, Chicken Little was running in and out of sessions and pecking all over the floor saying the sky was falling.

He (or was it a she?) was sure Tellywood was dead.

He/she knew that IPTV was taking over broadcasting.

Later it was positive that no one would watch video on anything but their cellphone.

Chicken Little may be having a slightly paranoid anxiety attack.

One thing we know is that the millions of large, high resolution screens (Figure 1) aren’t for mobile viewing! Even though the government has said everyone will convert to digital TV in a couple of years, industry analysts project that only 63 percent of the U.S. households will own HDTVs by 2010. Maybe by then the 49 percent of the folks who have the sets but don’t actually take full advantage of HDTV what they have to buy (or rent on a monthly basis) to make it work properly!

Today, 50 percent of the U.S. households have cable while only 26 percent have satellite. Then there are the folks who get the service free through the air. Despite the noise level, IPTV is just beginning to gather traction and as always it is with the technically elite who swear they are the majority.

By 2010, the Diffusion Group estimates there will be nearly 191 million cable subscribers worldwide (Figure 2). The cable guy with his two-way communications capability and growing bundle of service offerings isn’t sitting around waiting for the acorns to fall !!

There will be an estimated 53 million IPTV subscribers by 2009. Fighting over these subscribers will be hundreds of IPTV networks but only 40 of them will have more than 100,000 subscribers. That means we’ll have a lot of niche “channels” and a lot of VC-funded efforts that stumble, crumble and die in the years ahead.

While IPTV is very good for the technologically adventurous, only five percent of the satellite and cable TV customers said they would switch according to a survey by Market and Research. Thirteen percent said probably and 52 percent didn’t know. Which meant 35 percent didn’t have a clue!

Of course that hasn’t stopped backbone suppliers in going to Congress and insisting that they need protection of “their” Internet. What aging governmental officials don’t understand – and no service provider is going to tell them is that the Internet is like the cosmos (Figure 3). It is still as the original ARPANET was when it was conceived…a network of networks.

There are a lot of things coming together that make IPTV attractive (Figure 4). Video compression has improved. People like the idea of being their own TV programmers. Convergence is getting here…painfully. And broadband is becoming the norm.

But the most optimism is coming from folks who developed or have invested in the streaming solutions. They are certain that it is just what everyone wants/needs and they are just the people to deliver it.

We couldn’t get the time right to record TV shows with our VCR. We can’t do it with our PVR (our kids can but…).

The kids watch the shows on their PCs (yes with big monitors) but the family room set is still connected to the cable and connecting the new “converged” solutions is no easy task.

Broadband Internet connectivity is growing rapidly. Iceland, Korea, the Netherlands and Denmark (Figure 5) lead the connected globe with more than 25 subscribers per 100 inhabitants. DSL leads the race in 28 countries while Canadians and Americans are more comfortable with their cables.

If we were VCs with tons of money sitting on Sand Hill Road we’d probably not be spending a lot of time at home but go where the potential was…China, India, Indonesia and countries with significant populations and just the emergence of technology (Figure 6).

But it won’t be easy because that convergence we mentioned a little earlier also blurred traditional party lines. TV folks used to do TV. Phone folks handled the three minute calls. Then the Internet emerged and that took a big chunk of action out of the postal service. Next came the mobile phone and suddenly we would pass out if we weren’t talking to someone … somewhere!

Just as earbuds have become permanently implanted people are certain that everyone will have to have their video with them…all the time. Sure, it’s huge in Japan and Korea. In the U.S. there are already more than three million streaming TV/video content wireless subscribers and they are willing to pay an average of $40 per month to stay in touch with their latest soap.

The highest users? You guessed it people who are 15-24 and have really good eyes! And the people at V Cast, MobiTV and the emerging services are forecasting hockey stick growth that makes VCs salivate and helps industry analysts adjust their forecasts.

Now everyone wants to – and is trying their darndest – to do it all. But baby that ain’t easy (Figure 7). Content, devices, access, transport all want their piece of the action. In fact they want their unfair share of the action.

The service providers want the control and the visibility. They want to manage your home network. They want to limit their liability for your home network. They want to minimize their CPE (customer premise equipment) Capex (cost).

In the other corner we have the content providers who are determined to minimize content piracy which is no mean trick considering that it is estimated that $1.06 billion worth of pay TV was stolen in Asia last year!!!!

No wonder they want to maximize their compensation.

Cable – regardless of your view of “the Guy” – has been able to deliver relatively good quality of service (QoS). But we’re partial to the Internet cloud even though some of the backbone providers seem to be a little “overzealous” in their new demands. Because there are so many different routes, QoS is excellent. Don’t take our word for it, visit www.internettrafficreport.com.

Globally it is damn good and even though AT&T, Global Crossings, Covad and the other pipe owners claim it all because of them. B.S…it’s the cloud.

Of course that doesn’t stop Foxy Woxy from showing us the shortcut with his digital rights management (DRM). You know the stuff that doesn’t work interoperably. The stuff that establishes content usage rules (can you say sharply restricts). The stuff that gives them a solid business model (can you say huge profits).

IPTV is so fresh, beautiful and promising; everyone wants a piece of her.

The IP folks see them being tomorrow’s TV network. In all modesty…the ultimate TV and video aggregator.

The computer folks see themselves as playing a pivotal role in the home network. You know a place where you store all of your stuff. Of course connecting that to the TV requires: a) a lot of coordination; b) lots of bucks invested and c) for the foreseeable future either a rocket surgeon or 15 year old in the house to pull it all together.

The networking folks are working both sides of the street. They sell to the computer folks, deliver solutions to the IP people and want to play nice-nice with the service provider.

These dudes are struggling to not just provide the pipe but also some interesting content. Their homes host a lot of the indie content and prosumer stuff you see on the iNet. They not only control the equipment and deployment they are hell-bent to ensure they have tiers of QoS that someone pays for and …they don’t care who pays!!!

The numbers (read potential) are tremendous:
- 825.5 million mobile phones sold last year
- 930 million mobile phones will be sold this year
- 41% of mobile phone owners are “interested “ in videos
- 3 million plasma TVs sold so far
- 53 million IPTV subscribers by 2009
- HDTV market to reach $65 billion by 2009
- 111 million Internet users in China last year
- 47% of Europeans use the Internet
- PC sales starting to work on its 2nd billion units

That’s huge !!!

But keep in mind:
- U.S. population is 300 million
- World population is 6.5 billion
- Total Internet community is over 1 billion or roughly 15 users per 100 folks
- Total PCs out there are about 1 billion or 14 users per 100 people

And you know what they say?

The population is getting older.

Take the U.S. and project the numbers globally (Figure 8). By 2010 about 215.4 million will be ages 55-84 (watching a big screen is OK but a cellphone screen?). About 124.5 million will be 15-24 (great eyes that will go bad staring at the small screens).

The other two segments -- 25-39 and 40-54 -- won’t have much time to watch TV…they have to design/build/sell the content enjoyment devices !!!

Maybe Chicken Little is right. We must go tell the king!!!!

Of course in Tellywood he may be a queen !!!

#######

Related Articles
  The chicken and the egg
  David Brooks’ Weirdest Sentences
  Chicken or Beef?
  Hawaii Vacation Rental Tips: Know What You Are Ordering in Honolulu!
  Lesson #4: Set High Standards So You Can Take Pride In Your Product

Article Tags:



Related Forum Posts
Now KFC is rebranding... - I love Kentucky Fried Chicken - those 11 herbs and spices. Yum yum. Of course with the interference of the government and trans fat the chicken no longer tastes the same.... but I still like it... But all that's beside the point of this post, which is that in 1991, apparently, Kentucky Fried Chicken changed its name to KFC, and now, 15 years later, they're changing it back, because last year was a down year for them. I'm confused about this, because only yesterday my brother pointed out that the reason they'd changed the name in the first place was because the state of Kentucky was going to charge them a royalty fee for the use of the word Kentucky. I've been unable to verify that... but if its true... perhaps they worked out some kind of deal... I didnt' realize that the state of New York charges non-residents taxes, if they do a portion of their work in that state. For example, when a baseball, football or basketball team comes in to New York to play a team there - the visiting team's players have to pay taxes on the income they earn from that game - to New York. As far as I'm concerned, that's outrageous!!!
Book: The 1-Minute Millionaire: The Enlightened Way to Wealt - Book:The One Minute Millionaire: The Enlightened Way to Wealth Robert G. Allen (co-author of Chicken Soup for the Soul) 2002 Jacket: Is it possible to make a million dollars in only one minute? The answer just might surprise you. [This book] is an entirely new approach, a life changing "millionaire system" that will teach you how to: 1. Create wealth even when you have little or nothing to start with 2. Use the power of leverage to build wealth rapidly 3. Overcome fears so you can take reasonable risks Use "one minute" habits to build wealth over the long term ...Here are two books in one, fiction and non-fiction, designed to address two kinds of learning so you can fully integrate these life-changing lessons. On the right-hand side pages you will find the fictional story of a woman who has to make a million dollars in ninety days or lose her two children forever. The left-hand pages give the practical, step-by-step non-fiction strategies and techniques that actually work in the real world.
How To Make Up for Mistakes? - This topic has more to do with restaurants, I would think, than any other type of business, but I just thought I'd throw it out there. Earlier today I went to my local Kentucky Fried Chicken, where it quickly became clear that probalby 2/3rds of the staff were brand new... As I came in someone was complaining that they'd been given the wrong order, and 30 minutes later when I left, it was just after a man came into complain that he'd been given the wrong order. (Obviously through drivethru.) Why was I there for 30 minutes? I came in and ordered an 8 piece original meal. 5 minutes later I was told it was going to be another ten minutes, as the chicken had just gone down. 10 minutes later, I was told that *that* chicken had been the Extra Crispy, and they had run out of original and so it would be another 15 minutes for that. 15 minutes later...the manager told me that the original recipe had *just* gone down, the person he'd told to do it 15 minutes ago hadn't done it. Now, to make up for my 30 minute wait, the manager did give me 4 extra pieces of chicken, free. And then I got home to discover that instead of being given a side order of coleslaw, I'd been given green beans. Even if the green bean/cole slaw mixup hadn't happened... I seriously, seriously doubt if I'll ever go back to that KFC. Granted it was obvious that they were training in new people, but there's a point where sheer ineptitude begins to be apparent - they should be training people such that no one is on the floor who doesnt' know their job! And even though the manager gave me those 4 extra pieces of chicken as an apology, and although I appreciated it - and felt I deserved it - I will not be going back to that KFC any time soon. So.... from a restauranteur's standpoint, was it a waste of good chicken to give me those extra pieces when chances are I would never return?
Fast food workers - [quote:jxsovz2s] so why do franchises treat their employees like "worker bees" (i.e. work them till they quit or die or at least wish for their own deaths)? [/quote:jxsovz2s] I think that if "worker bees" approach their job with the right attitude, they can accomplish much. There are plenty of other people at the restaurant, so one is able to meet and interact with lots of people, see their personalities, etc. which is good for evaluating employees when you're in a position to hire them yourself. I think the main fault with fast-food restaurants is that they have such a hard time getting employees that they'll take anyone they can get, and then they only give them a couple of hours training before they put them out on the floor. Worse, they put them on the floor during the rush hour, and pretty soon they're in the deep end and not having fun because they don't really know what they're doing, and their managers are snapping at them and the customers are snapping at them and they get so frustrated that they quit. I suppose there are people who can pick up things very quickly and those are the ones that stick around...but there is certainly a high turnover rate. I talked a bit about this a month or so ago, when I related my experiences at a Kentucky Fried Chicken, where it was a comedy of errors, with me having to wait 20 minutes for my food, and then [i:jxsovz2s]still [/i:jxsovz2s]getting the wrong order. (And not the first time I'd had problems at this restaurant.) I have nothing but respect for fast food workers, and if they do screw up, I feel that 90% of the time it's the fault of the managers who didn't train them properly. But I doubt if the managers screw up because they don't care - [i:jxsovz2s]they [/i:jxsovz2s]probably haven't been trained properly in how to train their workers!
No guru is an island - In life we always look toward some men to solve our problems for us. We always put men on higher pedestals than ourselves. If only we know that there are no gurus out there. If only we know that whatever any of the gurus achieve we can achieve it and do better then we would look inwards to get things done ourselves. If you will be able to pay the price they pay, you will get there. Have you not seen the protégé that surpass his/her mentor? They are important to help us achieve our goals, but we should never make them our tin gods. They can make mistakes. If we rate them higher than necessary we will never believe we can be better than them. I have learnt that the so called gurus got to where they are today through hard work and learning. If you can pay the same price they pay. You will get there as soon as possible. How many times the guru had been wrong? If J.K. Rowlings listened to the advise of the expert we will not have Harry Potter’s series today. The Chicken Soup for the Souls first edition was rejected 33 times. Bill Gates said “The Internet? We are not interested in it” in 1993. This shows that the gurus can be wrong. So no guru is an Island. You can achieve anything in life if you put your heart to it. There is no guru that is better than you. You have also what it takes to be another guru yourself. You have all it takes to succeed just like them. You are solely responsible for your life. Don’t blame anybody. Don’t blame the gurus. Don’t say they are not available to help you out. Don’t say they reject your offer to do JV with you. You are to take them from the pedestal you place them and take your life and destiny into your hand. Stop the blame game. Don’t blame anybody but yourself for your misfortune. Your life and destiny is in your own hand. No guru is an island. No guru has a monopoly of ideas and hindsight. The good thing about the age we live in is we have access to the information they use to make exploit. The gurus are even good and generous enough to teach people their secret. If you can duplicate what they do you will get to where they are. You will even do better, because you will not make the mistakes they had made in the past. It is now time for you to begin to believe in your own judgment. I have been advised by my mentor in the past and I knew inwardly that it will not work. I listen to the mentor against my judgment and I lost a lot of money. Now I know better than to trust my instincts when making decisions. This is what you should be doing. It is your life and the decision you make will only affect you not your mentor.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

The Importance of Master Data Management (MDM)

Are You Remarkable Enough?

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.