|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Non-apologies and Non-answers Don't Help Non-profits
|
| Guest post by: Norman Birnbach |
Article Overview: Lessons learned from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation.
![]() |
Free Download - Nine Lessons from Netflix and the 'Half Apology" By Norman Birnbach |
Non-apologies and Non-answers Don't Help Non-profits
The well respected nonprofit Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation
is now embroiled in a scandal of its own making. The reaction to the
news that the foundation had decided to cut funding of $700,000 of
grants to Planned Parenthood has generated a storm of front-page
coverage, angry editorials, tweets and Facebook comments.
The
organization, which has built up tremendous goodwill and strong brand
recognition with its iconic pink ribbon, has a right to distribute its
$93 million in grant money as it sees fit, consistent with its mission,
fiduciary and legal responsibilities. However, the foundation has
clearly miscommunicated an apparent policy change with regard to Planned
Parenthood.
Critics are claiming that the reason Komen
cut grants to Planned Parenthood is due to politics -- specifically the
desire to placate some anti-abortion donors who have been targeting
Planned Parenthood, which provides breast-cancer screenings along with
privately-funded services, which may include abortion.
In
its attempt to explain the change in policy, the foundation issued a
statement, followed up by a video by Komen founder and CEO Nancy G.
Brinker, that it continually measures the impact and that the
organization "has the highest responsibility" to make sure "these donor
dollars make the biggest impact possible." You can see Brinker's
comments directly here.
At
the end of the video, Brinker invokes the promise she made her sister,
Susan G. Komen, in explaining the foundation's mission. She does a good
job in articulating the passion she feels for the organization, its
goals and its impact.
Unfortunately, though the video
is intended to provide background on the organization's policy changes,
Brinker never actually mentions Planned Parenthood by name. Nor, in
stating the organization revamped its guidelines and policies in terms
of grant-giving, does Brinker explain what new criteria Planned
Parenthood and others organizations now must meet in order to continue
to receive grants from the Komen foundation.
Ultimately,
her explanation is neither an apology -- Brinker's a bit to defensive
here -- nor a direct response to the questions people have.
And
because she doesn't provide a true answer about its decision that
impacted Planned Parenthood, Brinker has actually flamed the fires,
enabling people to assume that the decision was motivated by
anti-abortion politics that has spent the past year targeting Planned
Parenthood, investigating it for possible misuse of government funding
(which is kept separate from any abortion services Planned Parenthood
provides).
The lesson here is that goodwill takes years
to build up but can be damaged in a heartbeat if communications are
mishandled. I don't know if the Komen foundation will see long-term
negative impact on its programs and fundraising -- just as I don't know
if Planned Parenthood will see a long-term positive impact to its
fundraising and its support.
But I do know this damage
is self-inflicted, even if unintentional. Policy changes don't have to
be scandals. But it shows, yet again, that in the social media age,
organizations need to be more sensitive than ever to the impact of its
decisions and to the way those decisions are communicated and responded
to.
UPDATE: After this article was posted, the foundation actually reversed its decision, and did a better job of explaining its new policy:
Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.This information was not communicated well before -- which meant that the conflicting information coming from inside the organization and from former employees was getting significant play as people were trying to make sense of things.
That said, the tone of part of the response is more defensive than it might have been: "We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood. They were not."
At this point, the question remains: what long-term impact will this blunder have on this worthy organization. Let me know what you think.
Related Articles
Article Tags: crisis communications, Susan G Komen
|
About the Author: Norman Birnbach RSS for Norman's articles - Visit Norman's website A PR executive with 20 years' of experience in technology, nonprofits, health care, security, education, consumer, nonprofit and more, I run Birnbach Communications, a small agency helping clients achieve their business goals across traditional & online media. I've published articles in the New York Times, Wall St. Journal, Boston Globe, San Francisco Chronicle and dozens of other newspapers and trade publications. Click here to visit Norman's website 7 New Business Mistakes Agencies Make Nine Lessons from Netflix and the Half Apology Fee Fie Foe 3 Lessons learned when companies mishandle how they communicate their new fees Birnbach Communications Top Predictions for 2012 Good Lessons on Leveraging Events for PR |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.


