Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











Standardized Marketing Metrics and Organizational Singularity

Guest post by: Nate Gibby

Article Overview: The problem is that there isn't a standard set of marketing practices on which to base standardized metrics. Although nearly every organization may have a web site or a brochure, the usage of those tools is very disparate. marketing should be tied to the organization's key performance indicators, including profitability for a profit-driven organization. Beyond that, the organization should break down its KPIs according to its sales cycle and measure marketing's performance at every stage in that cycle.

Free Download - More Thoughts on Marketing Analytics By Nate Gibby
Name: Email:

Standardized Marketing Metrics and Organizational Singularity

Last week, Marketing Profs published an insightful article by Banks and Nahama calling for the standardization of marketing metrics. Banks and Nahama wrote the following:

We are chagrined to see marketers still putting forth hundreds, even thousands, of disparate measures for their specialized fields, with most of them stopping short of linking to financial return. It saps years of progress from the marketing discipline to hear marketing specialists, many at the top of their field, still make passionate arguments that it's all about viewers or listeners or impressions or eyeballs or click-through or brand or awareness or pass-along or engagement, etc. That trend seems only to be accelerating in the age of digital and social marketing. These thousands of measurements may have use for daily activity, but when they attract such, well, un-standardized attention, they hurt marketing and they distract CMOs from their main tasks. It's not all about eye-balls or click-through or brand awareness. It is all about financial profit and growth. When marketers accept the primacy of profit, they will gain a reputation for delivering high rates of financial return by bringing in valuable new clients and retaining current ones. If marketers do not begin operating from this perspective and generate standard metrics to prove it, they will continue to give up stature in relation to their peers.
I echo their position in that marketing must be able to quantitatively justify its existence if it is to claim fully justify itself as a contributing factor in creating value for any organization, cause, or idea. We advise all organizations to identify their key performance indicators and statistically gauge marketing's affect on those KPIs.

While Banks & Nahama argue that marketing must be tied to an organization's profitability, which in any profit-centered organization is essential, we also recognize that many organizations have other goals and ends and that your KPIs, profit or otherwise, should match up to those KPIs.

The difficult component of standardizing marketing metrics is that many marketers simply do not know how to correlate marketing efforts to bottom-line results. That is due in part to the fact that many of their efforts are focused on particular segments of an organization's sales cycle. As such, it can be difficult to correlate one segment of a larger process to bottom-line results.

The other problem is that there isn't a standard set of marketing practices on which to base standardized metrics. Although nearly every organization may have a web site or a brochure, the usage of those tools is very disparate. Every organization we've ever worked with has slightly unique processes, and consequently unique usage of marketing collateral. Developing a marketing strategy isn't quite and cut and dry as choosing accrual versus cash-based accounting.

As such, I agree that marketing should be tied to the organization's key performance indicators, including profitability for a profit-driven organization. Beyond that, the organization should break down its KPIs according to its sales cycle and measure marketing's performance at every stage in that cycle. That notion is applicable to every organization, profit or cause driven. Knowing and tracking the numbers of those KPIs throughout the sales cycle empowers marketers to establish metrics appropriate to their organization while being able to gauge their performance from awareness of their product, service, idea or cause all the way through the cycle, which in turn permits the correlation of marketing efforts to bottom-line results.

Related Articles
  More Thoughts on Marketing Analytics
  Quality in Marketing: You must start with these 2 definitions
  Who Cares More-Sales or Marketing?
  Defining Success Metrics for Corporate Blogs
  Measure your Marketing/Business Alignment
  How to Measure the Effect of Press Releases
  Web Analytics - Make the Switch to Performance-Driven Design
  CMO.com | Study Finds Marketers Don\'t Practice ROI They Preach
  Leading Lead Generation & Inside Sales
  HR Departments Need Business Acumen Too
  Monitoring Inside Sales Productivity
  Performance Metrics
  The business process that no longer works
  The Law of Singularity – Only One Move Produces Sustainable Results
  The First Written Music - An Evolving Process
  Essential Marketing Metrics for Small Business Owners
  Measuring Marketing Results in 2009
  Lead Generation Best Practices: Measure Beyond Cost-Per-Lead
  Strategies for Exceptional Growth
  Making the Most Out of Social Media for Your Organization

Home > Marketing > Nate Gibby > Standardized Marketing Metrics and Organizational Singularity >
Article Tags: key performance indicators, marketing accountability, marketing consulting, marketing key success factors, marketing metrics, marketing profs, marketing strategy, measurable marketing, standardized marketing metrics

About the Author: Nate Gibby
RSS for Nate's articles - Visit Nate's website

As a seasoned marketing consultant, Nate Gibby is the co-founder and director of marketing services for Serfwerks, a marketing and design agency specializing in quantifying marketing performance and significantly improving marketing results. His specialty is developing marketing strategy and analyzing marketing performance. Prior to founding Serfwerks, he served as the director of marketing for a restaurant franchise with approximately $20 million in annual sales with restaurants in seven states. He also worked as a marketing consultant for two Salt Lake-based marketing and design agencies. Nate has taught marketing strategy courses for organizations such as the Small Business Development Center, chambers of Commerce, and the University of Utah. He has also been a guest lecturer at the University of Utah, Westminster College and Brigham Young University.

Click here to visit Nate's website
Dashed Line

More from Nate Gibby
The Genesis of Strategic MarketingTier II Marketing Part I
Marketing Tools v Strategy and Tier I Marketing
Top Value Brands Part 2 of 2
Marketing Losing its Mojo Not So Fast
Marketing Creativity vs Analytics


Related Forum Posts
Re: What is your Business? Re: What is your Business? - We are running a Online Marketing Firm and we have some good clients to which we are offering a complete Digital Marketing strategy like Search, Mobile Marketing, Branding and Design. I think in Online Marketing company online presence can be a wining factor for the success of the company.
Re: Let’s talk about the ways of marketing your products, servic Re: Let’s talk about the ways of marketing your products, servic - I agree with some of the others who responded it depends on what your selling... but to answer your questions here are some of the methods I use. Forum Marketing Yahoo Answers (I need to use more of) SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Bum Marketing or Article marketing P-P-C (Pay Per Click) Marketing Online Directories Hope this helps.
Re: Should Evan add a "Social Media Marketing" category to the f Re: Should Evan add a "Social Media Marketing" category to the f - Hi, Online Marketing would be a great title, and having sub categories would make it even better, there would plenty of categories to choose from, Social Media, SEO, Article Marketing and yes even Affiliate Marketing to name just a few, great looking site btw Jeff, take care, Carol
HRPreneur HRPreneur - Hi everyone, I am new to the forum and I recently started my own Human Capital (HR) consulting firm called HRPreneur Inc. HRP focuses on making human capital a strategic differentiator for SME's. Below is a summary about HRP; Who We Are: HRP is a Human Capital consulting firm with 30 years of experience that becomes an extension of your company by providing a full array of services to help you create a highly engaged workforce focused on achieving strategic results in order to build a long lasting great company! Mission: HRP provides small and medium sized businesses a Strategic HR Business Partner to increase employee engagement, resulting in cost savings, increased productivity and results at an affordable rate! Vision: To inspire and warrant SME's reach their full competency! Cost Effectiveness: We provide over 30 years of experience at a fraction of the cost at a strategic executive HR business level You will save between 50% to 60% in costs per year on salary, bonus, benefits, training, office space alone We will provide you additional cost efficiencies through our services Services: • Strategic Human Resources Planning • Organizational Redesign • Change Management • Organizational Culture Development • Employee Engagement Programs • Leadership Assessment and Development • Compensation Design • Talent Acquisition • Assimilation and On-Boarding • Performance Management • Talent Management & Succession Planning • Human Resources Due Diligence • Human Resources Audit • Full Service HR Outsourcing
Kevin's Case Study #11 - A New Forum Category? Kevin's Case Study #11 - A New Forum Category? - Hi Everyone, 2009 is a new year and I'd like to create a new forum category to jazz things up! In the past, there's been some interest voiced about adding a "Social Media Marketing", "Online Marketing", "Internet Marketing" or "Online Promotion" category. I'll implement [u:1g2tv6tf]ONE[/u:1g2tv6tf] of those new categories, but can someone first tell me what the difference would be between the existing "Marketing" section and one of those new options mentioned above? Thanks


Recommended Article for You close

  More Thoughts on Marketing Analytics

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

••••••>SEO Tip Of The Day: HTML Validation

How to Conduct a B2B Marketing Content Audit

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.