This is the fourth in a series of articles that examines some of the analysis and solutions provided by the work of John Carver and his Policy Governance® model of board organization, applicable to business, government and non-profit organizations that want to increase their organizational effectiveness.
One of Carver's essential insights involves the division of labor. Modern business and production is built upon the division of labor. Yet, too many boards either do staff work and/or CEO work, and ignore the actual work of the board. Most boards understand their responsibility as supervising staff or overseeing staff functions, neither of which provide the essential leadership that boards are charged to provide.
Carver poses a different model. "The objective is not to bring the board more knowledgeably into the ongoing administrative process, as if staff operations is the train to be caught. The point is to establish the board's policy-making process as both preliminary and predominate. If boards are truly governing, then board members are not obliged to tag along behind management" (Carver).
Boards simply cannot take the lead if their work is derived from staff. While administrators often break their work down into categories like financial, personnel, service, data processing, etc., such a breakdown does not make such categories sensible for board work.
This common practice can be seen for what it is through an analogy. It's like classifying a manager's works on the basis of his executive assistant’s work. An administrative assistant's job is composed of typing, filing, telephone answering, scheduling, etc. It is clearly ludicrous to categorize a manager's work into administrative categories based on the work of an executive assistant. Such a manager would manage filing, manage telephone answering, manage typing, etc. It's a silly model. Yet, boards that simply follow the classification of work done by staff and administration are doing this very kind of thing!
"This error is so routine that we fail to see there is another way. Thus is conventional governance subtly managed by management, a far cry from management governed by governance" (Carver).
Carver divides the responsibility for board policy development into four categories: 1) the ends to be achieved by the organization, 2) the means to those ends, 3) board-staff relationship, and 4) the process of governance.
Ends. The essential issue regarding ends concerns is who will benefit from the organization? What human needs will be satisfied, for whom, and at what cost? Focus here provides genuine leadership.
Means. By identifying and isolating all organizational values pertaining to ends, the only remaining values concern means. For instance, once we decide where we want to go, the only decisions left are about how we will get there. In addition, ends and means are easily and often confused. Such confusion encourages apathy and inefficiency.
There is another very important issue with regard to means and delegation (or supervision). Managers must distinguish between their own means and the means of others to whom they delegate work. When it comes to delegation, telling other people how to do their jobs is fraught with difficulty. People today don’t like to be told how to do their work. The insightful manager must communicate the desired results, and allow the creativity of the subordinate to flourish. (This perspective does not always hold with regard to labor, but has increasing application as you go up the employment hierarchy into supervision, management and executive levels.)
Initially, the board should only be concerned that the staff means are effective, prudent and ethical. You might think that this goes without saying, but the world today is awash in ineffective, imprudent and unethical practices at every level of society.
Relationship. The remaining area involves the board's own means of accomplishing its work. Those means are readily divided into two groups: 1) how the board relates to the staff, and 2) how the board governs the organization. The first of these involves the board-staff relationship: How does the board relate to the staff? How does the board relate to the CEO? The second involves the organization: How does the board assess performance? Carver has a great deal to say about all of this that is very helpful.
Governance. The final area pertains to governing the organization. The first concern of governance is ownership because those who govern do so on behalf of the owners. Nonprofit and public boards govern on behalf of others who are often difficult to define and even harder to determine ownership values. Nonetheless, the owners of nonprofit and public boards are roughly equivalent to stockholders of equity boards. The function and purpose of governance is policy-making.
Board Fundamentals - To learn more about this author, visit Phillip Ross's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Related Articles |
|
Strategy vs. Fundamentals
|
| |
Creating companies is hard. Most fail. Overnight success is rare (my favorite “overnight success stories” are the ones that take 10+ years, like iRobot or Harmonix.) While strategy plays a key part in the outcome...
|
PDF Your Board Package
|
| |
Thankfully I no longer get fedexed binders of board packages from my portfolio companies in advance of a board meeting. Through the modern miracle of email, the board packages show up in my inbox – hopefully a few ...
|
The "Oh Shit" Board Meeting
|
| |
Peter Rip has a funny (and painfully familiar) comment about the near-inevitable "Oh shit" moment that comes at the first board meeting of a newly-financed early-stage company:
|
Board Development
|
| |
This is the third in a series of articles that examine some of the analysis and solutions provided by the work of John Carver and his Policy Governance® model for board of directors governance (www.policygovernance....
|
SEO Training Fundamentals to Keep In Mind When Designing a Website
|
| |
If you want a search engine to index your website in a quick as well as efficient and accurate manner and also get higher rankings you need to know all about search engine optimization (SEO) fundamentals and design ...
|
|
|
Phillip Ross
(Visit Phillip's Website)
Phil's professional education and life
experience have provided him with an
extensive understanding of people and
organizations.
With more than twenty-five years of
ministry leadership, Phil has both an
understanding of and experience with the
unique circumstances involved in ministry
and non-profit organizations. He has
particular understanding of and commitment
to historic Reformed Christianity. He has
extensive teaching, public speaking,
seminar and board leadership experience.
Academic degrees in Philosophy and
Theology provide a broad based perspective
that understands logic, emotion, and
values, and the significant roles each
play in every organization. As a graduate
of the Dale Carnegie Sales Training
Institute (1966), Phil also has extensive
knowledge of sales.
Self-trained in graphic design and web
design, Phil has enjoyed many years
working in the art and science of design.
As a published author of five books and
many articles, Phil understands the
subtleties of language, grammar, editing,
and the art of turning a phrase.
|
|
 |
|
|
Phillip Ross's
Complete
List Of
Marketing
Articles
|
|
|
If you enjoyed this article, get Phillip Ross's Complete List of Marketing Articles For FREE!
|
| |
|
|
|