Tweet

Obama vs. the Charities!

Written by: Bob O'Brien

Article Overview: Veteran Financial Planner explains why President Obama’s reduction to charitable deduction will mean less for charities.

Obama vs. the Charities!

Last week in his prime time news conference the President made it very clear when asked about his plan to reduce the deduction for charitable contributions, “if people were just contributing to charity for the deductions than it was not really charitable to begin with”. Who can argue with that? He also stated that “the poor economy has reduced contributions”. Who can argue with that too?

You also cannot argue with the fact that these charities are going to receive even less because of the reduction of this deduction.

First of all, a lot of people that tithe a portion of their income like 10% or 20% do so, on a net basis. There will be a decrease in the charitable contributions because they will now have less net income and therefore some will feel forced to cut out some giving as part of their overall financial plan.
Regardless of whether this is the proper way to give, charities will receive less!

The people that make big contributions are really good with their money and that is why they have a lot and are able to make large charitable contributions. They also put their own financial security first, because they want to make contributions to charity and they do not want to become a charity themselves!
Taking care of yourself first, is at the foundation of financial planning. “Pay yourself first” and “act in your own interest first in order to serve the common good” (Adam Smith). Obviously, these need to be tailored with common sense as well, and certainly stealing and unethical behavior does not serve the common good.

The bottom line is that, his proposed plan will cause charities to receive less, because most really wealthy people have a formula for tithing as part of their financial plan. The tithing percentage is genuine and from the heart, and this percentage will stay the same but the dollar amounts given to charities will be reduced by this policy.

I have had wealthy clients that wanted to give more to charity then they should be giving and told them they need either to give less or reduce their lifestyle significantly because your plan will not sustain you through retirement. They would usually cut a little of both, which does not bode well for the charities.

I really like President Obama, and realize that people have different priorities when it comes to tithing. But I cannot understand what he has against charities and why he would even risk them receiving less, especially when he could just increase the top bracket by a fraction to create the same effect for government revenue.

Why not make paying/giving additional federal income tax, tax deductible? A person pays an extra $100k in taxes and they get back $40k. The IRS is still up $60k. The person that gave it feels like they gave $100k to reduce the national debt and the government feels like they gave them $40k.
Our political leaders do not use their fiscal policy power as creatively as they should!

This type of fiscal creativity could have been really useful, while the real estate bubble was forming.

Why didn’t someone come out and call for the elimination of all the deductions for real estate when things got out of control. By just making this threat alone, this could have cooled off the real estate market significantly!

Sincerely,
Bob O’Brien

Related Articles
  Lead Like Obama
  A Call to Action for the Sales Force
  Barack Obama scores a marketing home-run on The Tonight Show
  Change Management - Obama Style
  The Value of Your Personal Brand

Article Tags: adam smith, bottom line, charitable contributions, charities, charity, common sense, financial planning, financial security, heart, money, net income, news conference, poor economy, prime time, time news, tithing, unethical behavior, wealthy clients
Referred by: http://www.mywealth.com



Related Forum Posts
Re: Obama or McCain? - If I want to be partial , I would say Obama because I am black. But this should not be if you want to vote objectively. Otherwise, I will prefer Obama because of his age, charisma and energy
Re: Still Not Sure Who To Vote For? - Hi IdeasU, Don't worry, I'm still committed to the evancarmichael forum, but I have been very busy since I returned from my holidays with editing work, extra teaching work during college term, several large and complicated orders from my Japanese-games-shop customers and the launch of a monthly PLR article writing service (see sig file!). === Back on topic... If I were an American citizen I would vote for Obama. I explained what did it for me on another thread. My main interest was foreign policy, but the more I watch Obama and McCain the more impressive Obama seems and the less convincing McCain appears. So far, Obama has proved excellent in handling the ad hominem attacks, and McCain's attempts to smear him with "associating with terrorists" look increasingly lame.
Re: Obama mentorship system - Obama is a new-age thinker in my opinion. I think Obama is a tremendous progressive thinker and political icon that will inspire the younger generations throughout his tenure. His ability to 'break the mold' and do what needs to be done instead of repeating how things have been going to date, will set his mark in American history. The meeting of the minds sort to speak is exactly what every new president needs to do in order to appreciate the magnitutde of information and decision making that is required of him.
Re: Still Not Sure Who To Vote For? - [quote="topeyinka":1j77tiy7]I don't need no software to tell me who to vote for if I am in America. Obama is my man any day. Not because I am black, but because he is young, enrgetic and resourceful[/quote:1j77tiy7] I'm a middle-aged white guy voting for Obama. He's highly intelligent and the dynamic leader we now need to lead us through the economic turmoil. He has the potential to be another great like JFK.
Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals - This monring I got a mail from the newswatch magazine I subscribed for that: Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals! Millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. Barack Obama’s plan gives a driver’s license to any illegal who wants one. But that’s not all. Obama’s plan gives illegals social security benefits and raises taxes for his health care plan to cover them. Who pays? You do. Driver’s licenses and government benefits for illegals. Higher taxes for us. That’s Obama’s plan. Obama. Too radical. Too risky. The National Republican Trust PAC is responsible for the content of this advertisment. In think this is a political propaganda, in order to discredit the candidancy of Obama. Or will it be true? What impact do you think will have on entrepreneurs in america?


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Work at home Opportunities for the Disabled

How do I finance a franchise?

Smart & Simple Internet Techniques

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.