Tweet

EQ Vs. IQ-Hiring People Who Can do More than Just the Job

Guest post by: Stephen Blakesley

Article Overview: Emotional Intelligence is an essential to success on the job. Perhaps as much as 75% or more of a person's success on the job can be attributed to Emotional Intelligence. In many knowledge based jobs, IQ is necessary to get the job, but Emotional Intelligence (EQ) is essential to success in those jobs.

EQ Vs. IQ-Hiring People Who Can do More than Just the Job

In the business world, we are always looking for ways to gain advantage over the competition. For many years, organizations thought that bright, intelligent people were the key to superior performance. But “book smarts,” in the form of high IQs or stellar GPAs, we now know, don’t always translate to equally exemplary job performance.

An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a measure of cognitive capacity--one’s ability to think and reason. IQ usually does not change much after the age of 12 to 15. Many non-manual jobs require an above-average IQ; that is, they have “a high IQ threshold.” But hiring people with high IQs is not a guarantee that they will perform in a superior way.

Why is that, you might ask? The answer may rest in a conversation that took place between two psychology professors, John Mayer and Peter Salovey, in 1987. Salovey, of Yale University, and Mayer, of the University of New Hampshire, were discussing a particular, bumbling politician and posed the question; How could someone so smart act so inexplicably dumb? They came to the conclusion that good decision-making requires more than intellect, or what we normally think of as IQ. Mayer and Salovey soon developed the concept of emotional intelligence (EQ).

Dan Goleman picked up on the theme in his 1995 best-selling book Emotional Intelligence: Why it Can Matter More than IQ. One of the seminal studies of Goleman’s book involved star performers at the prestigious Bell Laboratories near Princeton University. Managers were asked to identify the top performers among the engineers and scientists that worked there. All of the engineers and scientists were presumed to have high IQs in order to perform their jobs. Yet, while some emerged as outstanding, the majority were just average.

Goleman used standard IQ and personality tests on both groups and found no substantial cognitive difference between the stars and the average workers. Based on this study, Goleman wrote in the Harvard Business Review that academic talent was not a good predictor of on-the-job productivity, nor was IQ.

After detailed interviews, the social scientist detected critical differences. The stars had built networks of key people. They used their strong interpersonal skills to create informal teams of competent people who they could rely upon, when needed. Goleman saw this team-building skill as a requisite for superior performance.

Goleman’s research led him to conclude that leaders drive action by building relationships, recognizing their own emotions, responding to the needs of others and by revealing their own mistakes. He termed these traits emotional intelligence (EQ) and defined it generally as the ability to recognize, understand, use and manage emotions in one's self and in others. Unlike cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence can be taught and learned.

Key traits of emotional intelligence

People with high EQs tend to have four qualities or competencies in common:

• Self-Awareness--knowledge of current emotional state, strengths and weaknesses
• Self-Management-an ability to draw upon an inner control to appear calm, cool and collected
• Empathy--understanding of others’ points of view, understanding and feeling others emotions and decision-making processes
• Social Management-the ability to manage the emotional state of the group or groups

The more accomplished you are in these four competencies the higher your EQ. The higher your EQ the greater your chances of success. EQ is not all there is, however, moods play a major role as well.

Moods are dissipated emotions-How they affect performance?

Do moody leaders make better leaders? The answer is: it depends on the prevailing mood. Is the leader optimistic and happy, or pessimistic and depressed? Few people will give their full support to a gloomy, cynical leader, at least for very long. Their negative nature, not to mention lack of positive feedback, leads to high workplace turnover and may even cause some malcontents to sabotage an organization in revenge.

Happiness—and the attractive aura it produces—is both an emotion and a mood and may be what is left-over from the emotion of Joy. The latest research indicates that happy people enjoy life more and live longer than unhappy people. No surprise, since content people focus on the positive and surround themselves with people like themselves – not to mention that they are more willing to embrace change. The “mantle of happiness” is thought to influence people simply because happiness attracts attention. Now we also know something else: Happiness has an observable, positive impact on productivity.

This might all sound obvious, and yet how often do executives hire or promote managers who fail to connect with or motivate their employees?

I spent 27 years hiring managers, who, in turn, hired sales and administrative people. My own observation is that a little dissatisfaction or unhappiness with the past and/or the current state is often a good thing. Managers and leaders who are always happy with the current situation are not too motivated to change it. Many successful entrepreneurs and leaders are happy but dissatisfied with the current state. The dissatisfaction drives them to create change, but overall happiness is essential to job success.

Another mood that impacts results is optimism--the view of the world as a positive place and the future as bright and achievable. An optimistic mood is almost always a necessary quality among leaders, as it imbues their language with hope and possibility for desired outcomes. Plus, not many rush to follow a pessimist.

Differentiating between the true optimist and pessimist is easy, according to Joshua Freedman, author of The Art of Leadership: How to Get Results with Emotional Intelligence. Freedman claims the optimist looks at an unsettling state as temporary, isolated and changeable while the pessimist views it as permanent, pervasive and immutable. Optimists see the possibility of change and pessimists see the chains of the present.



The moods of a leader are important for many reasons. The fact that moods are contagious and spread quickly within organizations makes them powerful performance contributors or detractors. A leaders’ mood often becomes the mood of the organization, which can determine long-term success or failure.

Moods such as optimism, anxiety, depression and anxiety are long-lasting states of being that endure great time spans. Emotions tend to be shorter lived and triggered by events. Our mood often acts as a "trigger" and determines our emotional response to an event. When we encounter an event that requires emotional skills, our ability is either diminished or enhanced by our mood.

Benchmarking and testing for EQ

The difference between a manager and a leader is typically 90 percent EQ skills. Managers are often appointed to their positions not because of their management skills but because of their knowledge and experience. Some mangers go on to become great leaders, while others become only good managers–and some don’t even do that.

To use EQ as a hiring tool, many companies benchmark a position’s top and bottom performers for emotional intelligence. The benchmarking process identifies traits that are present in top performers and absent in the bottom rank. Companies can then test potential candidates for those traits or EQ competencies required by the job.

Two tests are available that effectively measure a person’s EQ. The MSCEIT, developed by Mayer, Salovey and David Caruso, was the first EQ test. A more updated test was

developed by Rueven Bar-On, a psychologist who coined the term “emotional quotient.” The Bar-On model (more widely used and validated than the MSCEIT) tests in five general areas:

· Intra-Personal – ability to be aware of, manage, and express emotions

· Inter-Personal – ability to initiate and maintain relationships with others

· Adaptability – ability to be flexible, solve problems and be realistic

· Stress Management – ability to tolerate stress and control impulses

· General Mood – happiness and optimism levels

I like to approach the identification of EQ competencies essential to a job from both external and internal viewpoints. The external approach requires a carefully crafted, facilitated session where five to seven people in an organization are tapped for their insight into the EQ competencies they believe are needed for superior job performance in a particular position. The internal approach involves assessing superior performers currently on the job to see what competencies dominate. Ideally, an organization should do both and combine the results, but often the job is new and has no incumbent to assess. In that case, an organization can rely on the external results alone.

The above approach allows for both applicants and incumbents to be assessed and matched against benchmarks. The goal is to give a clear, quantifiable picture of what drives performance in a particular job, and also to identify opportunities to leverage strengths and manage around individual weaknesses.

Most organizations want, but do not have, superior performers. By learning more about EQ, matching job candidates to job benchmarks and creating a more intentional hiring process your organization can happily be an exception. There are several good EQ assessments available and I recommend that they become a regular part of your selection and hiring process.

Related Articles

Article Tags: Emotional Intelligence, EQ, IQ, moods



Related Forum Posts
Re: Kevin's Case Study #3 - Promoting something you can't try - I agree with ltrahan. People generally have to see it to believe it these days. I know I would want to.
Re: What's in a Name? - First of all your brand name should be short and speaking. People should remember your name and associate it with your services.
Re: How can I use this forum to market my company? - Indeed this forum is a great place for your business promotion. People are looking into it seriously and i have been getting a lot of positive response.
Re: new at this and need to get moving - Hi Glenn, This is a good place to come for ideas. People are very open and willing to share. What is the product you sell?
Re: Five Personality Traits of Successful Business Owners - 1. Focus 2. Ability to Adapt 3. Hard Work 4. Good planning 5. People Skills


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Sales Courage and Resilience

••••••>SEO Tip Of The Day: HTML Validation

B2B PR – Planning for Success

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.