Merger or consolidation; facility actions help it succeed
Merge or consolidate to concentrate resources for successful operation; use economies of scale to minimize cost. But don’t overlook facilities and operation, where all the plans and expectations must come together or the new entity won’t function.
In any economy, especially this one, consolidation or merger can make economic and strategic sense. First plan, and later integrate, equipment, processes and facilities properly because they affect not only the balance sheet but also future P&L results of the entity.
Disciplines such as legal, financial, treasury, HR and accounting always participate in valuation
or project justification steps to consolidate or merge. The plans that they make, the assumptions they build on, come together in the facility. At the time of due diligence, and again when facilities are to be physically combined, take a close look at how the final facility will operate to increase the opportunity for success.
To consolidate existing corporate operations, or merge different corporate entities, is usually quite similar from the facility standpoint. And the approach is effective not only for industry, but also in situations where the output is paper, or ideas, or customer service, or container loads. It works well in military Base Realignment and Closure. Most activities involve the same factors; work, organizations, missions, output, constraints, manning, task assignment, equipment, and progress reporting.
This article is primarily strategic in nature, but see also my article “Consolidate or Merge, a Checklist” for more specific guidance. And when you are ready, Jackson Productivity Research Inc. will be glad to assist with the many details necessary for successful consolidation or merger both in the due diligence steps and later in implementation.
1. During due diligence and valuation
A. Set objectives for future cooperation; consider in both the merger candidate and the potential acquirer how the operations would fit together for enhanced productivity. Consider at least,
1. Work done: Output, capacity, present cost, potential improvement.
2. Facilities: Capability for the task, condition, exposures. Lease, own.
3. Productivity: What it is, how to make it better.
4. Technology: How current and how effective. New product introduction process.
5. Systems: Existence and effectiveness of manual or electronic systems.
6. Constraints: Identify and quantify them, suggest how to relieve them.
7. Priorities: Quantify the relatively few factors which cost the most and offer the biggest potential for improvement.
8. Logistics: Materials, flow. Inventories and obsolescence.
9. Organization: Relationships, improvements possible. Synergies and critical mass improvements possible with multiple organizations.
10. Vendors for major components. Strength of, dependence on, vendors.
11. Location strategy: What should be where; potential benefit of relocation.
B. Specific actions to accomplish due diligence objectives
1. Understand client strategy and objectives, and the scope of the project.
2. Visit facilities of the acquirer which are similar to those to be acquired. Understand any unique factors to look for, and possible synergies.
3. Visit the facilities to be acquired. Quantify the actual facility, equipment, and process situations.
4. Evaluate the information gathered.
5. Report physical conditions particularly as they affect the intended use of the facility and process, at the site or if another location is chosen. Determine options available and make recommendations accordingly.
a. Call out and quantify any potential “show stoppers”, situations that have the potential to adversely affect the entire merger.
b. Physical characteristics of facility and grounds, capacities and limitations; utilities and services, discharges, environmental risks from past processes, permits required for addition or modification, environmental permits required and available, fire protection, zoning, easements, building possible on acreage. If leased, terms and dates of the contract, and sublease possibilities. Lease or sale potential of owned property.
c. Equipment and process; capacity, capability, condition, and limitations. General levels of productivity, and opportunities for improvement in the categories of people, inventory, and equipment.
d. Technical characteristics of the acquisition which affect ability to be relocated, such as dependence on local technology and support, complexity, similarity to the acquirer, level of documentation available.
e. Operating cost characteristics of the acquisition which are location sensitive, which would change the cost structure in another community. Operating cost differentials if it were to be
1) Kept at the existing location, 2) Integrated into an existing client location, 3) Placed at a new location chosen for cost effectiveness.
2. Post acquisition activity
Facility planning and industrial engineering actions can be very useful in the transition after an investment, especially to reach the expected levels of growth, modernization, new product introduction, technology, integration, or interaction for which the investment is targeted. End results will probably involve action throughout all facilities and operations, to:
A. Maximize
1. Operating utilization and throughput at facilities. Return on assets.
2. Product consolidation and integration, product mix.
3. Capacity for existing and new products.
4. Proximity to markets. Customer service.
5. Access to technology, people, utilities.
6. Company image and quality of life objectives.
B. Minimize
1. Location sensitive operating costs such as labor at all levels of the organization chart, taxes, occupancy, utilities, waste disposal.
2. Distribution and incoming freight costs.
3. Constraints, cycle times, inventory.
4. Facility asset value and operating cost.
5. Antiquated facilities which impede operations.
C. Actions to achieve these objectives will have unique cost, personnel and logistics ramifications.
1. Improve operating utilization to optimize throughput and return on assets in existing locations. In each facility, maximize capacity, productivity, efficiency, output. Minimize constraints, cycle times, inventory, costs. Justify new technology.
2. Revise operating mechanisms to take advantage of the other new corporate locations, and the complementary relationships and synergies possible from combination; equipment dedication, seasonality, capacity, longer runs; management, scheduling, purchasing, overhead leverage, distribution patterns and methods. Add new products, or adjust to a more profitable product mix.
3. Improve operating utilization by combining or relocating processes within or between facilities. Consolidate equipment and / or processes. Expand or relocate equipment for capacity; to reach new markets; cut operating or distribution cost; move from antiquated facilities; access technology, people, utilities. Integrate production into the low cost configuration. Extricate useful equipment or facilities, and mothball, lease or liquidate the excess.
Jack Greene, Jackson Productivity Research Inc.
Merger or consolidation; facility actions help it succeed - To learn more about this author, visit Jack Greene's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Related Articles |
|
Consolidate or merge, a checklist
|
| |
To consolidate or merge successfully, through choice or because it has been imposed by market forces, a company must properly integrate equipment, processes and facilities in the final entity. A well done facility p...
|
Merger or consolidation; facility actions help it succeed
|
| |
Merge or consolidate to concentrate resources for successful operation; use economies of scale to minimize cost. But don’t overlook facilities and operation, where all the plans and expectations must come together o...
|
The Case for Cost Control in this Economy
|
| |
So what is it with this economy, and how does it affect what your business should do, can do? Productivity is always a good tactic, with improvement possible in all areas of a business. Tried and true cost control a...
|
Consolidation Debt Management Money
|
| |
There are some who question whether debt consolidation truly eases a person's credit problems. Although debt consolidation is highly promoted claiming that a single loan is easier to handle towards eliminating debt ...
|
Who Wants to Be an Emperor?
|
| |
The defining feature of an entrepreneur is his interest in business – not in a particular business but in business itself.
|
 |
Related Businesses - Evan Elite Authors |
|
Vwodek Wojczynski
Business Coach and Consultant Vwodek Wojczynski (pronounced Voy-chin-ski) brings fun, awareness, accountability and fresh perspectives based on his diverse experiences in life and business.
Born in Poland and educated in Greece and Canada, he is trilingual with 8 years experience in business development with clients in Canada, USA, Switzerland and Poland.
His approach is systematic and process-driven. He fuses the know-how of proven business methods with his commitment that entrepreneurs experience satisfaction and joy based on their values, motivations and strengths. He believes that businesses succeed based on their ability to generate value by providing what’s needed and wanted.
Ultimately, he trains executives and true business owners - people who work less, produce more, own businesses that run automatically after a while and make a difference globally.
His current research focus is the development of intelligent business systems and the application of emerging artificial intelligence technologies in business.
He is also an avid traveler, spoken word performer and visual artist. He resides in Toronto, Canada. - Visit Vwodek Wojczynski's Website |
|
The Evan Elite Authors program is currently in beta phase. For details please contact us.
|
|
|
Jack Greene
(Visit Jack's Website)
Jack Greene is president of Jackson
Productivity Research Inc. He writes about
practical business actions which even in
today’s economy will control and reduce
costs; plant layout; time study;
motivation; productivity improvement;
capacity, constraints, and utilization;
merger and consolidation of facilities;
cost justified relocation within or into
the US.
Jack uses his experience in dozens of
productivity improvement, work
measurement, cost reduction, and layout
projects; for large and small companies,
US and international, as a basis to share
insights. He recognizes that a business
must continue to satisfy customers and
produce quality product even while
controlling costs. The articles address
all businesses because they deal with
people and the elements of work; with
efficient facilities, tools and equipment;
with successful management practices.
Mr. Greene established Jackson
Productivity Research in 1991, and
previously headed division or corporate
industrial engineering for three Fortune
250 companies; ITT, Abbott Labs, and
Bausch & Lomb.
Jack Greene Jackson Productivity Research:
Productivity is our Middle Name jack@jacksonproductivity.com jac
ksonproductivity.com
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|