Motivation
Motivation
There are employee engagement and motivation programs from ABC Analysis to Zero Defects, and many work well at least for a time.
My experience tells me that any program can really succeed only if it supports an otherwise sound management structure, with good products and quality and customer support; with decent forecasts and good controls, equipment and overhead structure; with modern technology, standardized and documented processes, and good materials scheduling.
In such a context perhaps any motivation will work well. Or perhaps in such a context one does not need a formal program. But employee motivation is pretty complex. This article outlines classic ideas, and insights into 2008.
The comments on classic motivation refer to three well known sources, and two sources I have just read.
1. Abraham Maslow, in his Hierarchy of Needs theory, explained the five needs as: physiological; safety and security; belongingness and love needs; esteem and reputation needs; the need for self-actualization. In this day and age we like to think most U. S. workers have satisfied the first two needs and so their needs are somewhere in the third, fourth and fifth levels.
I personally think Mr. Maslow is correct in all levels of human motivation, and his ideas should be considered to apply not just to individuals but also to international dealing between have and have-not nations, for instance.
In the modern workplace, perhaps we assume that employees are further up on the hierarchy than they really are, especially in difficult economic times. If a worker perceives that his job is threatened, that is a level one issue because his very survival is at stake. Are you motivating a person to keep his job or to perform better? A different motivation will be effective in each case. A client a few years ago was a unionized textile company in Rhode Island. Sounds like three strikes, right? But both company and employees realized that the existence of everyone was at stake, and with active cooperation were making a success of what they could do, seeking out the niches they could fill, and meeting the orders with quality work, on time.
2. Frederick Herzberg in the Harvard Business Review, January-February I968 wrote One more time: How do you motivate employees?
He identifies job dissatisfiers as separate from job satisfiers, and rated achievement, recognition, work itself, and responsibility as the most significant satisfiers. Pay was recognized by Mr. Herzberg as a corrector of dissatisfaction; more pay would bring an employee back up to even, but did not cross into satisfaction.
I am in solid agreement with Mr. Herzberg on his views except for pay, in which case I am more inclined to agree with James Lincoln.
3. James Lincoln founded Lincoln Electric of Cleveland which from the 1930's until recently was generally regarded as the most productive company in the world. Mr. Lincoln promised that no one would lose their job because of productivity improvement, and the company routinely paid annual bonuses to all levels greater than the already generous base wage. Not coincidentally Lincoln quality led the industry.
When I called Lincoln Electric years ago to ask about their plan, I was told that hundreds of companies inquired, but that to their knowledge none, zero, had emulated the “no lay off policy”, and very few offered such substantial bonuses. The company I was employed by was dumbfounded by both those ideas. Needless to say, no company achieved the Lincoln level of productivity of those years.
4. Just recently I have read two more sources, one scholastic and one more practical. You might want to look at a paper published in 2003, “Evolution of human motivation theories: An examination of human motivation theories in the twentieth century” by Kenneth S. Rhee and Tracey Honeycutt Sigler, Department of Management & Marketing, Northern Kentucky University at www.midwestacademy.org/Proceedings/2003/papers/rhee.doc. It mentions all the sources I know and many others, from Frederick Taylor on, and the phase of the evolution they came from or caused.
See also the book “1001 ways to energize employees” by Bob Nelson, Workman Publishing, New York, which is a summary of practical applications that companies have implemented. Mr. Nelson has published many other books.
So, somewhere in this lies truth. Maybe the boss should just pass out coffee and doughnuts, because I have seen that as very motivational. After all, that is Maslovian and Herzbergian, and occurs many times in “1001 ways”.
For the economic situation arising in 2008, do these classic answers apply? And did these motivations cause the actions that precipitated the mess we are in?
The Maslow Hierarchy of Needs theory is dominant today in the minds and actions of most people and companies, it seems to me. People and companies have quickly jumped to safety and security levels from the warm and cozy levels of belongingness, esteem, reputation and self-actualization. Even if they are actually safe and secure, companies and people act, intelligently, as if they are threatened. And of course many in fact are threatened. The U. S. auto companies for instance have abandoned the need for esteem and reputation that they so carefully cherished a few short months ago. It seems pretty logical for a company to act to protect its own safety and security, and to recognize that their employees desire the same protections.
There is nothing obvious in motivation theory to have caused the economic failures of this century; greed and hubris don’t appear in the theory. Safety and security depend on good management and perhaps that has been overlooked in the race for continual short term profits and growth.
Jack Greene, Jackson Productivity Research Inc.
Motivation - To learn more about this author, visit Jack Greene's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Motivation
There are employee engagement and motivation programs from ABC Analysis to Zero Defects, and many work well at least for a time.
My experience tells me that any program can really succeed only if it supports an otherwise sound management structure, with good products and quality and customer support; with decent forecasts and good controls, equipment and overhead structure; with modern technology, standardized and documented processes, and good materials scheduling.
In such a context perhaps any motivation will work well. Or perhaps in such a context one does not need a formal program. But employee motivation is pretty complex. This article outlines classic ideas, and insights into 2008.
The comments on classic motivation refer to three well known sources, and two sources I have just read.
1. Abraham Maslow, in his Hierarchy of Needs theory, explained the five needs as: physiological; safety and security; belongingness and love needs; esteem and reputation needs; the need for self-actualization. In this day and age we like to think most U. S. workers have satisfied the first two needs and so their needs are somewhere in the third, fourth and fifth levels.
I personally think Mr. Maslow is correct in all levels of human motivation, and his ideas should be considered to apply not just to individuals but also to international dealing between have and have-not nations, for instance.
In the modern workplace, perhaps we assume that employees are further up on the hierarchy than they really are, especially in difficult economic times. If a worker perceives that his job is threatened, that is a level one issue because his very survival is at stake. Are you motivating a person to keep his job or to perform better? A different motivation will be effective in each case. A client a few years ago was a unionized textile company in Rhode Island. Sounds like three strikes, right? But both company and employees realized that the existence of everyone was at stake, and with active cooperation were making a success of what they could do, seeking out the niches they could fill, and meeting the orders with quality work, on time.
2. Frederick Herzberg in the Harvard Business Review, January-February I968 wrote One more time: How do you motivate employees?
He identifies job dissatisfiers as separate from job satisfiers, and rated achievement, recognition, work itself, and responsibility as the most significant satisfiers. Pay was recognized by Mr. Herzberg as a corrector of dissatisfaction; more pay would bring an employee back up to even, but did not cross into satisfaction.
I am in solid agreement with Mr. Herzberg on his views except for pay, in which case I am more inclined to agree with James Lincoln.
3. James Lincoln founded Lincoln Electric of Cleveland which from the 1930's until recently was generally regarded as the most productive company in the world. Mr. Lincoln promised that no one would lose their job because of productivity improvement, and the company routinely paid annual bonuses to all levels greater than the already generous base wage. Not coincidentally Lincoln quality led the industry.
When I called Lincoln Electric years ago to ask about their plan, I was told that hundreds of companies inquired, but that to their knowledge none, zero, had emulated the “no lay off policy”, and very few offered such substantial bonuses. The company I was employed by was dumbfounded by both those ideas. Needless to say, no company achieved the Lincoln level of productivity of those years.
4. Just recently I have read two more sources, one scholastic and one more practical. You might want to look at a paper published in 2003, “Evolution of human motivation theories: An examination of human motivation theories in the twentieth century” by Kenneth S. Rhee and Tracey Honeycutt Sigler, Department of Management & Marketing, Northern Kentucky University at www.midwestacademy.org/Proceedings/2003/papers/rhee.doc. It mentions all the sources I know and many others, from Frederick Taylor on, and the phase of the evolution they came from or caused.
See also the book “1001 ways to energize employees” by Bob Nelson, Workman Publishing, New York, which is a summary of practical applications that companies have implemented. Mr. Nelson has published many other books.
So, somewhere in this lies truth. Maybe the boss should just pass out coffee and doughnuts, because I have seen that as very motivational. After all, that is Maslovian and Herzbergian, and occurs many times in “1001 ways”.
For the economic situation arising in 2008, do these classic answers apply? And did these motivations cause the actions that precipitated the mess we are in?
The Maslow Hierarchy of Needs theory is dominant today in the minds and actions of most people and companies, it seems to me. People and companies have quickly jumped to safety and security levels from the warm and cozy levels of belongingness, esteem, reputation and self-actualization. Even if they are actually safe and secure, companies and people act, intelligently, as if they are threatened. And of course many in fact are threatened. The U. S. auto companies for instance have abandoned the need for esteem and reputation that they so carefully cherished a few short months ago. It seems pretty logical for a company to act to protect its own safety and security, and to recognize that their employees desire the same protections.
There is nothing obvious in motivation theory to have caused the economic failures of this century; greed and hubris don’t appear in the theory. Safety and security depend on good management and perhaps that has been overlooked in the race for continual short term profits and growth.
Jack Greene, Jackson Productivity Research Inc.
Motivation - To learn more about this author, visit Jack Greene's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. |
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jack's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Manners, Positivity, Heroics Evolution of Networking Loyalty Strategies Content Challenged How To Select Keywords |
|
 | ||
 |
Email The Reporters
Press Release Builder | |
 |
Top 50 Franchising Blogs
Top 50 Franchising Blogs | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||