|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Value added explained
Written by: Jack GreeneArticle Overview: We will cut to the heart of what value added means, but you will have to judge how it suits your operation for yourself.
![]() |
Free Download - Risk Assessment Techniques for Valuation and Due Diligence of Operating Companies By Jack Greene |
Value added explained
Value added explained
We will cut to the heart of what value added means, but you
will have to judge how it suits your operation for yourself.
In the spirit of value added, this article concisely refers
to pertinent information. Good stuff. Apply it to your operations, and translate
the general concept to specific actions to remove waste.
1. Define
waste, or non-value added
An incisive
place to start is a series of questions to define waste, or non-value added:
a. Will a
customer pay for this activity?
b. Will my
service fail without this activity?
c. Will I go
to jail if I eliminate this activity?
Answer
"no" to all three, and the activity can essentially be defined as
waste.
Business
Week, Management section, By The Staff of the Corporate Executive Board, March 6, 2009
2. WRC
A longtime
boss and student of productivity W. Richard Clark says, "The first
consideration, of course, is not just doing what you do with maximum
efficiency, but deciding if it's even what you should be doing in the first
place.
Even more importantly is providing a product that is unique
enough (and there are many ways of achieving this uniqueness) to avoid being a
commodity and to be able to justify higher prices. To add value."
Combine this thought with 1 a); something that does not add
value may have been created because it was believed that a customer pay for the
activity. Review the belief; either the activity will pay for itself or not.
3. Bill Waddell
On a site titled Evolving Excellence, a blog entitled To Value or Not To Value, Bill Waddell makes a rigorous case. Among other things he says
""The bottom line is that it is very important that the discussion be held within every company and that 'value adding' be well defined.
Value adding expenses should be reduced very, very carefully because it is too easy to degrade customer value in the process - that is the trap too many companies that run to China fall into.
Non-Value Adding expenses, should be cut with near reckless abandon.
For that matter, in many companies, they should not be reducing overall expenses at all. Instead they should be shifting expenses from non-value adding activities to ones that genuinely enhance the value of the product and will enable them to command higher prices. That is the real lesson from Toyota's history. Their cars are not cheaper than their competitors - they are a better value. A greater percentage of the money paid goes into the car, while their same-cost competitors are squandering it on administrative nonsense, overblown advertising, global logistics and other waste."
4. Toyota
Production System, per Art Smalley
You may say,
Toyota is having trouble too. That is so, but TPS is not the reason. Art
Smalley, President, Art of Lean, Inc. wrote "TPS vs. Lean and the Law of
Unintended Consequences" in Superfactory in 2006.
From that article, I quote:
In the U.S., becoming Lean appears to have gone down a path
of implementing tools such as “one piece flow”, “value stream mapping”,
“standardized work”, or “kaizen events”, but results have not always
followed. Toyota, by way of
contrast, has stayed focused on its principles and a disciplined emphasis on
process improvement to obtain results such as “making a `profit”, “reducing
lead-time”, “improving productivity”, “achieving built in quality”, as well as
“respecting human dignity of employees” etc. The difference may sound trivial,
but it is actually significant.
While other individuals have commented on the need in Lean
to have “problem awareness” or “kaizen consciousness”, the phrase I remember
most from my superiors at Toyota was to have “cost consciousness” and to never
waste a dime.
Put a stop to the dogmatic routine of using any single tool
(value stream maps, kaizen events, or any other) and expecting that it will
highlight or solve all the problems in the facility
4. Total
productivity
In 2005,
Delphi Corporation went bankrupt, haven't emerged in mid 2009. The Lean
community was in a tailspin for a long time, because Delphi had been awarded 24
Shingo Prizes for Lean excellence in their factories, and if an award winning company went bankrupt, what hope was there for the rest?.
All factors were discussed in Superfactory for months, but I quote from a November 5 article by Bill Waddell.
An eye opening statement there is " Very few companies have advanced with
lean manufacturing until you can see the results financially --- perhaps one or
two percent at best."
Why not? My own belief is that few organizations
apply cost consciousness throughout, as they do on the production floor. What is direct labor cost in your organization? Ten percent
or so? What if you save a third of that, a very aggressive target? Peanuts. Put
the same effort into the major line items on your P & L and see what
results you achieve.
5. Inventory
Another challenging topic in the Mr. Waddell's Delphi article concerns inventory, and how it
was considered by Taichi Ohno, one of the two founders of the TPS. "Taichi
Ohno said in quite clear terms that inventory is ‘waste’. Our financial and
operating systems and practices are built around the deeply embedded principle
that inventory is an asset.
"Was
Ohno’s use of the term ‘waste’ simply a euphemism or an erroneous translation?
Or is it simply easier for us to assume that he was speaking in flowery
language than to confront the idea that the core of our balance sheet and
P&L logic might be wrong?"
6.
Specifications
Consider
what your organization produces, and how it specifies the attributes. Do you
produce thumb tacks and have a set of pharmaceutical quality specs? All my life
I have wanted to produce thumb tacks and have as a sole spec, "one end
shall be more pointy than the other." But in that case, the spec could be
adequate. Look again at point 1 a) with specs in mind.
7. Lean
versus fat
Does anyone
set out to design a "fat" operation, overloaded with un-necessary
requirements? Probably not; probably inefficient systems evolve with good
intentions. But now your process may need revolution to reach a satisfactory level.
Blame is not important, but an objective look at the specifics is.
Thanks for
your attention; I'm happy to add to your perspective of
industrial engineering and productivity.
Jack
Greene Jackson
Productivity Research Inc.
Article Tags: non value added, value added, value analysis
|
About the Author: Jack Greene RSS for Jack's articles - Visit Jack's website Jack Greene is president of Jackson Productivity Research Inc. He writes of practical actions to control and reduce costs through time study; plant and facility layout and design; balance workloads; optimize capacity and utilization; improve productivity; manage constraints; merge and consolidate facilities; cost-justify facility relocation. Mr. Greene's articles demonstrate how principles of industrial engineering and productivity achieve results, and reflect consulting assignments with Fortune 250 companies, and much smaller ones, in industry, construction, government, service, and hotels. Jack Greene is the author of books on Amazon in print and Kindle editions; click these links and read about the books and what's inside. Plant Design, Facility Layout, Floor Planning. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Plant+Design%2C+Facility+Layout%2C+Floor+Planning&x=17&y=18 Cost Reduction How to Survive, Recover, and Thrive, Time and Motion Study What, Why, and How-To A client will expect certain results from a consultant, and these articles outline what may be expected from JPR because they reflect our experience, business approach and services. We offer hands-on consultancy, to lead or participate in activity; or if you choose we can train your resources to perform the work in-house. Jackson Productivity Research Inc., at http://jacksonproductivity.com, welcomes inquiry about practical actions to accomplish your organization's objectives and scope, within your timetable and budget. Please email jack@jacksonproductivity.com
Click here to visit Jack's website Priority Pareto and the Gorilla List Risk Assessment Techniques for Valuation and Due Diligence of Operating Companies Merger or consolidation facility actions help it succeed Manufacturing productivity tool belt Whos court is that ball in Or that aint my job man |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
The Future of Online Marketing
Adapting to Technology and the Internet
Resolving A Conflict Between Two Sales Staffs
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.


