|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Benchmarking (Part 2)
Written by: John HeapArticle Overview: If we decide that benchmarking makes sense, we have to decide what we should benchmark and how we can get the data we need - internally ... and from those we want to benchmark against.
![]() |
Free Download - Do you need a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Program By John Heap |
Benchmarking (Part 2)
Benchmarking (Part 2)
What do we need to benchmark?
Clearly benchmarking involves
cost. We need therefore to decide on
what areas will give us the best return for the investment … or perhaps what
can we benchmark easily and cheaply using, say, publicly available data. One rather obvious strategy is to benchmark
against already identified critical success factors – what performance areas
are crucial to the longer-term success of the organisation. Within these areas we might them benchmark
specific processes. A major pharmaceutical
company might decide that R&D is crucial to success ... and then might want
to benchmark activities/processes such as number of patents applied for in a
given time period, time from patent to market, etc.
If delivery time (from order
to delivery) is a key issue for us, and we find out that though it typically
takes us 5 weeks to get an order out of the door it takes our main competitor
only 18 days, then we have a reason to be concerned and a reason to take
action.
How do we get the data we need?
Benchmarking need not always
be based on detailed, reliable data.
Often we carry out informal benchmarking (though we may not call it
that) using ‘data’ from trade shows, talking to salespeople, talking to our
customers, etc.
As we have previously
mentioned, simple benchmarking data can also be obtained from publicly
available information – company reports, industry reports, and so on. We may need to subscribe to a specific
sector-based database (though we must be wary of the historical nature of this
data) or join a benchmarking club that shares accrued, anonymised data amongst
the members.
For some data, we might have
to undertake – or commission – specific ‘research’ - and this will of course incur significant
cost. Often this is based on surveys and
questionnaires
Competitive versus Industry Benchmarking
It is most useful to
understand what our major competitors are doing … benchmarks here are directly
related to our competitiveness. However,
this is often the hardest data to obtain (and why we might have to rely on
informal data from our ‘grapevine’).
(Assuming that competing
firms did decide to share performance data – for mutual benefit – they would
have to be very careful to avoid legislation and regulation relating
anti-competitiveness.)
Xerox – when faced with
competitors from Japan
– were one of the first organisations to undertake competitive
benchmarking. They could not understand
how their Japanese competitors could get products manufactured for less than
they (Xerox) were paying for their raw materials. So, they ‘reverse engineered’
their competitors’ products to understand the differences … and then had to
think of the kinds of equipment and process changes that could turn out these
different components and get them assembled at so low a cost.
Competitive benchmarking
normally concentrates on the 1, 2 or 2 major competitors only … those who (are
known to, or thought to) set the standards of excellence in particular areas.
Industry (or sector)
benchmarking (where we use data from a large number of organisations comprising
a whole sector) is more generic – it helps establish ‘standards’ and ‘norms’ –
and helps show trends across the industry.
It is therefore more useful in helping to identify product / service
trends. It is often promoted by industry
associations since this general knowledge helps the industry as a whole.
Article Tags: benchmarking
|
About the Author: John Heap RSS for John's articles - Visit John's website Productivity is my 'bag' ... it is what I know about. I am President of the World Confederation of Productivity Science -http://www.wcps.info and Director of the National Productivity Centre in the UK http://www.natprodcentre.com - go to this site for some good free resources and some (paid for but low price) e-learning on productivity. I also edit the International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management. My views on productivity and on learning (which I think are related) are summarised at http://www.johnheap.net .... and current productivity news and views are on my blog - www.donotcomplicate.blogspot.com. You may also want to join the Productivity Futures Group on LinkedIn (http://www.linkedin.com). Finally if all this leaves you cold, go to www.mockprod.com for a more light-hearted look at (mock) productivity. Click here to visit John's website Getting Rid of Waste Becoming lean and mean Improving Productivity through Energy Management Kaizen Waste Not |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Four Secrets to Earning Income as an Author
20 MORE Must-Have Search Engine Marketing Tools
Unspoken Yet Important Rules for Book Proposals
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



