Forget It Its Too Hard to Measure

Please feel free to publish this article in your ezine, newsletter,
offline publication or website. Only requirement: you must
use the Robert A. Kelly byline and resource box. Net word
count is 665 including guidelines and box.
Robert A. Kelly © 2006.

Forget it! It’s Too Hard To Measure

Oh, I don’t know. I feel pretty good about the way some of us
measure public relations results. I mean how can you measure
the results of an activity more accurately than when you clearly
achieve the goal you set at the beginning of that activity?

In my opinion, you can’t. It’s pure success when you meet
that goal.

The same goes double for public relations. The client/employer
wants our help in altering negative perceptions among
key audiences which almost always change behaviors in a
way that helps him or her get to where they want to be.

Are we qualified to do that job?

Yes, because everything we do is based on the realities that people
act on their perception of the facts and that we can do
something about those perceptions. When public relations
activity successfully creates, changes or reinforces that
opinion by reaching, persuading and moving-to-desired-action
those people whose behaviors affect the organization, the
public relations effort is a success.

But before we follow that client/employer on his or her
way to that kind of successful public relations end game, a
few words about the measurement challenge itself.

Unfortunately, measurement is a large challenge and one
that stands between us and development of that conclusive
indicator showing that a public relations investment has
been applied wisely.

Unfortunately, the usual public relations performance
measurement methods are subjective and open to wide
interpretation because we do not have widely accepted
public relations measurement standards.

Instead, in evaluating public relations performance now,
we must use highly subjective, very limited, borderline-
invalid and only partially applicable performance
judgements. Among them, inquiry generation, story content
analysis, gross impressions, and even equivalent advertising
value.

It’s incredible when you think about it.

Here we are, part and parcel of America’s multi-trillion
dollar industrial, educational and organizational colossus
and, yet, we cannot demonstrate conclusively – that’s
CONCLUSIVELY – that we achieved our public relations
program’s behavioral goal.

Why? Because, as of today, it costs WAY too much public
opinion survey money to demonstrate – again, conclusively –
that we achieved the public relations perception and behavioral
goal set at the beginning of the program. In many cases, the
opinion research costs more than the entire underlying public
relations program. Thus, it’s almost always set aside in favor
of “winging it.”

What are we to do?

This article highlights what many professionals already know.
We need this final step in the public relations problem solving
sequence, and we need it badly.

What can be done? I like NASA’s traditional approach. When
money is especially short, these dedicated people repeatedly
find another way around the problem using an amazing mix of
technology innovation, operational creativity and raw
determination.

So here, in the year 2006 , why cannot the best minds in the
fields of public relations, sociology, psychology and
opinion gathering attack the challenge of PROVING
CONCLUSIVELY that a given public relations campaign has
– or has not – changed target audience behaviors precisely
as planned at the beginning of the program, and do so without
bankrupting its participants?

Until an answer to that question presents itself, we have little
choice but to track perceptions among key audiences the best
way we can; monitor follow-on behaviors; then create, change
or reinforce that opinion by reaching, persuading and moving-to
-desired-action those people whose behaviors effect the
organization.

The missing ingredient will continue to be affordable public
opinion research.

end

Bob Kelly counsels, writes and speaks about the fundamental
premise of public relations. He has authored 245 articles on the
subject which are listed at EzineArticles.com, click Expert Author,
click Robert A. Kelly. He has been DPR, Pepsi-Cola Co.; AGM-PR,
Texaco Inc.; VP-PR, Olin Corp.; VP-PR, Newport News
Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.; director of communications, U.S.
Department of the Interior, and deputy assistant press secretary,
The White House.
mailto:bobkelly@TNI.net Visit:http://www.prcommentary.com



Forget It Its Too Hard to Measure - To learn more about this author, visit Bob Kelly's Website.

Like this article? Share it with your friends

E-Mail | Print | More

Related Articles
Measure THAT
	One of the secrets of the Yellow Pages was that the phone company would give you a second line when you bought a big ad.
When you're thinking about using a marketing company
	For many small companies, the thought of doing marketing could definitely be classed as hard work! Where do you start? What should you do? Have you got enough time to do it? Helen Dowling from Exceptional Thinking (...
Sales Training Top Salespeople Stay in Touch with Prospects and Customers
	While November 10th, Forget Me Not Day is a day to remember family, friends, and loved ones, salespeople can also add their prospects and customers to the list.
Closing - No Tricks Required
	So you are hoping for a magic trick to closing? Wouldn't it be so much easier if we could just utter a special phrase that would make our prospects suddenly forget the competition, forget the hard-to-calculate retur...
Reminders: Put Your Keys in Your Fridge!
	The other night I was staying at a hotel because I was delivering a workshop this morning. As we always do when I'm traveling, as I get ready to go to sleep my husband and I talk on the phone. He opens the conv...

---

Related Forum Posts
	Off to get married, Congrats
	Re: Vera Wang Profile
	Re: Why Some Websites Sell and Others Don’t?
	Re: What would you be willing to do for a million dollars?
	Word of Mouth Transformation - Recording
	Do you believe in "Mantra" or "Mission Statem
	Re: Luck favors the prepared
	Too Much Too Easy

---

Related Businesses - Evan Elite Authors

Dianne Crampton Dianne Crampton is an Executive Leadership Coach and Team Building Consultant and creator of the TIGERS team development model. For the past twenty years she has helped leaders and teams achieve goals with high levels of collaboration and teamwork. Crampton is a published author. Her contribution to Working Together: Diversity As Opportunity was endorsed by Stephen Covey. She has written for trade magazines. Merrill Lynch nominated her business for Inc. Magazine’s regional small business and entrepreneurial awards. Her work with Native Americans was recognized at a United Nations sponsored conference in 1994. The TIGERS model passed two rigorous validation studies in 1992 and 1994. The TIGERS Survey is able to measure and track team development over time. Dianne is also the creator and distributor of the TIGERS Team Wheel game. This game helps groups identify behaviors that build collaborative groups and behaviors that cause conflict, morale problems, production failures, and misunderstandings. For more information, or to subscribe to TigerTracks, a free monthly leadership and team newsletter go to http://www.corevalues.com - Visit Dianne Crampton's Website

The Evan Elite Authors program is currently in beta phase. For details please contact us.