Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header
Share for a Cause









“GOOGLE SNITCH” Google’s Can O’ Worms

Written by: William Atkin

Article Overview: Is search engine optimization going to last forever, or is the industry in trouble?

Free Download - The 2nd dotcom Boom Social Media By William Atkin
Name: Email:

“GOOGLE SNITCH” Google’s Can O’ Worms

Not since the famous “Troubled Times for SEO firms” article has there been so much controversy in the SEO world. On April 14th, 2007 Google’s Engineer/unofficial spokesman Matt Cutts announced on his blog that Google has initiated a new “spam reporting form” in the Google Webmaster Console. Matt Cutts says the new form will allow webmasters to report “paid links” as a form of spam. The announced came shortly after the SES conference in London, England.

In Matt Cutts blog he states “Something thing I heard at SES London was people wanted a way to report paid links specifically. I’d want a few paid link reports anyway because I am excited about trying some new ideas here at Google to augment our existing algorithms.”

Since then there has been over 500 comments on the original post. Major SEO websites and bloggers across the Blog-o-sphere have taken up in arms against Google’s new plan to eliminate paid link advertising. Not only are there serious flaws in the ideology of comparing paid link (advertisements) to lowly Viagra spam. The effects of this initiative are far reaching, causing many to question Google’s motives. There are several reasons why this is a mistake.

Paid Link Fraud

Individuals and Companies will exploit this more than click-fraud…..it’s easier to defraud.

Since the huge click fraud problem why would Google open up a brand new fissure for deceitful exploits and manipulation? Whats to stop a users or companies from buying spammy links in their competitors name and then reporting them?

Semantics

How do you define “paid links”?

The concept of a paid link is tricky to begin with. What constitutes payment: money, trade, personal favors? Even if you manage to nail a definition down how would categorize and verify every claim?

Proof Positive

How can Google prove links were bought and paid for without seeing financial records?

How exactly does Google plan to verify claims? Is there going to be an actual financial investigation unit that follows up using stored user data? The burden of proof is on Google and cannot be deferred, can they live up to this responsibility without violating (anti-trust) laws, or is it my word against yours?

Pagerank

Cut the head off the snake to kill it, not the tail.

Google created this situation in the first place by putting emphasis on links and creating Pagerank. The whole reason links matter is because of Pagerank. If Pagerank didn’t exist would paid linking even be an industry? The biggest question is, do paid links contribute to spam and yes some do but most probably don’t.

Google’s got no sense (except Adsense)

Isn’t Adsense a paid link?

Google’s primary profit base comes from advertising via Adsense. How could Google denounce link advertising when their entire business model is created around selling links? Also isn’t it bizarre that Google’s Vice President of Advertising is the co-founder of Associated Content. What’s worse is that recently Associate Content stopped renting link space to Text Link Ads, what a coincidence.

Conflict of interest

Determining link space

There is a conflict of interest if Google one of the world’s largest internet ad sellers determines the rules about selling ads. What balance is there that would prevent Google from skewing the rules to their advantage? Is it fair for Google to monopolize internet advertising by disallowing anyone else to do it? Sorry Google there is no way to get rid of spam entirely (unless you control all content).

If this wasn’t enough, Matt Cutts along with Google Advertising VP Tim Armstrong are avoiding the spotlight. According to WebPro News both Google employees are failing to respond to communication attempts. Perhaps this is a matter of timing, or this delay is intentional. Maybe Matt Cutts and Tim Armstrong are planning their next move. Regardless, this issue isn’t going away and if Google pushes forward with paid link reporting there is likely to be SEO turmoil.

Related Articles
  I Love Google's Style
  Google Adsense - Don't Lose Your Account
  Get The Facts And Fight The Smears!
  Article #44 Start A Site With Google Ads In 6 Simple Steps
  Google

Home > SEO > William Atkin > GOOGLE SNITCH Googles Can O Worms
Article Tags: Google, link advertising, Matt Cutts, Matt Cutts, SEO

About the Author: William Atkin
RSS for William's articles - Visit William's website

William Atkin is a writer for the web design/internet marketing company Utah Web Services, a subsidiary of Wiworks Inc. For over 9 years they have provided regional and national web services to clients in all industries. We have provided Utah Search engine optimization to business nationwide.

Click here to visit William's website
Dashed Line

More from William Atkin
Choosing an SEO firm
SEO Growth on the Rise
GOOGLE SNITCH Googles Can O Worms
Social Media Spam
Feeds RSS and Podcasts oh my


Related Forum Posts
Re: Search Engine Optimization Re: Search Engine Optimization - Another good tip to remember when considering the value of a link is that all links are not handled quite the same. When we ask about things like whether a link is site specific or page specific, it's a good thing to remember that a search engine does not really see a Web site or even a a Web page. From a simple minded search engine robot's perspective, the whole Web is seen as a world made up of URLs. Reciprocal linking does not have quite the same value it did years ago. In a way, it is good to link out based on other pages that are related to a similar topic. But if you link to them and they link to you, it somewhat nullifies the value. Not always, but sometimes. The other thing to mindful of is that sometimes if you link to a Web site and are not aware that that site is participating in a link farm or doing something else against Googles Webmaster Guidelines, that you could end up being penalized for linking to that site. Google says that if a nasty site links to you, that's beyond your control, but anyone you link to is well within your control. For example, it could be something that is not readily evident to you, for example suppose you link to a Webmaster who makes a habit of buying high PR links. There have been cases where people are flagged because they are linking to shall we say "bad neighborhoods." What other types of links hold good value? Links within your own Web copy tend to have more value than links in your navigation. If a related site links to you and is also includes your keyword in their Title Tag, the link on that will have more benefit than if the Title of the page is unrelated. Initially, Google use to devalue links in some Social Media sites like keyword rich links coming to you from Facebook, but these days they seem to be carrying more value than they use to. Remember that a link within a caption underneath an image, tends to have a little more value too. In my own link building actions, I try to stay focused on links to informative pages or Blogs that I think my readers will benefit from and are at least somewhat related to the topic I'm discussing. Remember that if you Blog, that most Bloggers are very generous with links because they just seem to be so focused on their topics (or at least in cases where the Blog has a defined purpose) and many will Blog daily and many Blogger are focused on 2 way dialog and conversation trails about their topic. Other great places to get links from are authoritative and busy Web sites, places like About.com (but you need to write very useful content of an engaging, useful nature in order to get them to link to you) and of course there are educational sites that tend to deliver a lot of value in their links.
Re: Search Engine Optimization Re: Search Engine Optimization - [quote="John Alexander":tfpeanna]Another good tip to remember when considering the value of a link is that all links are not handled quite the same. When we ask about things like whether a link is site specific or page specific, it's a good thing to remember that a search engine does not really see a Web site or even a a Web page. From a simple minded search engine robot's perspective, the whole Web is seen as a world made up of URLs. Reciprocal linking does not have quite the same value it did years ago. In a way, it is good to link out based on other pages that are related to a similar topic. But if you link to them and they link to you, it somewhat nullifies the value. Not always, but sometimes. The other thing to mindful of is that sometimes if you link to a Web site and are not aware that that site is participating in a link farm or doing something else against Googles Webmaster Guidelines, that you could end up being penalized for linking to that site. Google says that if a nasty site links to you, that's beyond your control, but anyone you link to is well within your control. For example, it could be something that is not readily evident to you, for example suppose you link to a Webmaster who makes a habit of buying high PR links. There have been cases where people are flagged because they are linking to shall we say "bad neighborhoods." What other types of links hold good value? Links within your own Web copy tend to have more value than links in your navigation. If a related site links to you and is also includes your keyword in their Title Tag, the link on that will have more benefit than if the Title of the page is unrelated. Initially, Google use to devalue links in some Social Media sites like keyword rich links coming to you from Facebook, but these days they seem to be carrying more value than they use to. Remember that a link within a caption underneath an image, tends to have a little more value too. In my own link building actions, I try to stay focused on links to informative pages or Blogs that I think my readers will benefit from and are at least somewhat related to the topic I'm discussing. Remember that if you Blog, that most Bloggers are very generous with links because they just seem to be so focused on their topics (or at least in cases where the Blog has a defined purpose) and many will Blog daily and many Blogger are focused on 2 way dialog and conversation trails about their topic. Other great places to get links from are authoritative and busy Web sites, places like (but you need to write very useful content of an engaging, useful nature in order to get them to link to you) and of course there are educational sites that tend to deliver a lot of value in their links.[/quote:tfpeanna] That was all very helpful to me. Thanks


Recommended Article for You close

  I Love Google's Style

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article


Bottom Footer
Share for a Cause












Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

Life is a Balancing Act!

10 Steps to a Great Support Team

How do I finance a franchise?

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.