|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Usability of Options in Search Engine Result Pages
Written by: Jordan KastelerArticle Overview: Google is what it is today because of their keen adaptation of usability. This article is a look at some of the options they implement, and questions whether they are the best choice or not.
![]() |
Free Download - Top 10 SEO Tips for Every Website By Jordan Kasteler |
Usability of Options in Search Engine Result Pages
Recently, Yahoo! and Google have both been adding new options to their search engine result pages (SERPs). These options include Google’s PlusBox and and Yahoo’s Quicklinks. Illustrated below is Google’s PlusBox for Walmart. They have a PlusBox for their stock quote that expands to give stock information. Along with that, they have category or sub-page links within their site. Google typically does this for strong authoritative Websites with a high amount of Trust Rank.
Another example below shows Google’s PlusBox being used for localized search. They have a PlusBox that shows the localized listing in the SERPs with their map, address, and phone number. You don’t have to be an extreme authority to have a PlusBox with this type of localized integration.
Yahoo’s Quick Links are similar to Google showing sub-pages for authoritative sites. However, Yahoo! will also be charging for these Quick Links if you’re a site that doesn’t get them naturally. The think I like better about these Quick Links in the search engine result pages is that they are inline horizontally. Thus, they take up less room.
Good or Bad Usability Practices?
In my opinion, I think Google and Yahoo! are getting out of hand with their SERPs. I firmly believe in allowing the Websites, authoritative or not, to display their prominent content to the user (i.e. stock quotes, maps, sub pages, shopping categories, etc.). It is a search engine’s job to display quality and relevant results to queries, but it is not the search engines job to display a site’s content to the user.
When you have more options on a Webpage you have more:
* Distraction
* Noise
* Thinking
* Load Time
* Code
* Images
* Bandwidth (a problem for mobile search)
I think Google became the most popular search engine not by their results but by their simplistic user interface and good usability. Both Yahoo! and MSN have searches integrated into their news pages whereas Google has just had a single standalone search box.
I’m sure I stand alone on this because I’m sure Google and Yahoo! both held extensive case studies, focus groups, stakeholder research, and testing before putting this into motion. I guess they know what they’re doing, but I’m annoyed by it. Sometimes less is more, right?
Article Tags: Google, integration Yahoo, PlusBox, Recently Yahoo and Google, search engine, search engine result, search engines, SERPs, site Google, Yahoo
|
About the Author: Jordan Kasteler RSS for Jordan's articles - Visit Jordan's website Jordan Kasteler is a Utah SEO specialist that provides a blog and podcast on the topics of search engine optimization, internet marketing, and other Utah SEO items of interest. Click here to visit Jordan's website Polish your localized SEO for Google Local Voice Search Longtail of Search Engine Optimization Usability of Options in Search Engine Result Pages Choosing a SEO Firm SEO Measures for Mobile Search |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



