Recently, Yahoo! and Google have both been adding new options to their search engine result pages (SERPs). These options include Google’s PlusBox and and Yahoo’s Quicklinks. Illustrated below is Google’s PlusBox for Walmart. They have a PlusBox for their stock quote that expands to give stock information. Along with that, they have category or sub-page links within their site. Google typically does this for strong authoritative Websites with a high amount of Trust Rank.
Another example below shows Google’s PlusBox being used for localized search. They have a PlusBox that shows the localized listing in the SERPs with their map, address, and phone number. You don’t have to be an extreme authority to have a PlusBox with this type of localized integration.
Yahoo’s Quick Links are similar to Google showing sub-pages for authoritative sites. However, Yahoo! will also be charging for these Quick Links if you’re a site that doesn’t get them naturally. The think I like better about these Quick Links in the search engine result pages is that they are inline horizontally. Thus, they take up less room.
Good or Bad Usability Practices?
In my opinion, I think Google and Yahoo! are getting out of hand with their SERPs. I firmly believe in allowing the Websites, authoritative or not, to display their prominent content to the user (i.e. stock quotes, maps, sub pages, shopping categories, etc.). It is a search engine’s job to display quality and relevant results to queries, but it is not the search engines job to display a site’s content to the user.
When you have more options on a Webpage you have more:
* Distraction * Noise * Thinking * Load Time * Code * Images * Bandwidth (a problem for mobile search)
I think Google became the most popular search engine not by their results but by their simplistic user interface and good usability. Both Yahoo! and MSN have searches integrated into their news pages whereas Google has just had a single standalone search box.
I’m sure I stand alone on this because I’m sure Google and Yahoo! both held extensive case studies, focus groups, stakeholder research, and testing before putting this into motion. I guess they know what they’re doing, but I’m annoyed by it. Sometimes less is more, right?
Usability of Options in Search Engine Result Pages - To learn more about this author, visit Jordan Kasteler's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Related Articles |
|
 Usability of Options in Search Engine Result Pages
|
| |
Google is what it is today because of their keen adaptation of usability. This article is a look at some of the options they implement, and questions whether they are the best choice or not.
|
|
The lifeblood of websites.
|
| |
A quick dissertation on why SEO is important.
|
|
Your Company's Name and SEO
|
| |
I hear this question quite often. Sometimes before starting an SEO project my clients will call and tell me how important it is to rank #1 in Google under "my xyz company". But just how important is it to have your ...
|
|
What to look for in an SEO Firm
|
| |
If you are looking to hire an SEO firm, here is some of what you want to look for in that firm.
Keyword Research and Copywriting Skills
Both SEO and search engine advertising require keyword research and copyw...
|
|
Searching for Better On-Site Search Usability
|
| |
Not every site needs, nor should have, an on-site search feature. But those that do must be sure that the search isn't just an after-thought. It needs to be more than something to add because you think visitors want...
|
|
|
Jordan Kasteler's
Complete
List Of
SEO
Articles
|
|
|
If you enjoyed this article, get Jordan Kasteler's Complete List of SEO Articles For FREE!
|
| |
|
|
|
![[Get Copyright Permissions]](http://license.icopyright.net/images/icopy-w.gif){kind=small}
