|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |  |
|
Can Sales Assessments Actually Predict On the Job Sales Success
Written by: Dave KurlanArticle Overview: Stathead was hell-bent on learning about the technical nature of how the assessment works, how it was created, how it was validated and its impact on protected minorities. While this is important, it can be very misleading. As you will read below, a test can meet all of those criteria and not help with selection at all!
 |
Free Download - Sales Courage and Resilience By Dave Kurlan |
Can Sales Assessments Actually Predict On the Job Sales Success
I received a call from the HR VP of a large company that was very interested in using our assessments to select new salespeople. I said the company was interested but the HR VP was out to prove how much he knew about assessments. He was more interested in n's, r's, alphas, deltas, standard deviations and construct validity. Unless you're a PhD. or statistician, most of you won't know what those things are and to all but a few who understand them, you don't need to.
Stathead was hell-bent on learning about the technical nature of how the assessment works, how it was created, how it was validated and its impact on protected minorities. While this is important, it can be very misleading. As you will read below, a test can meet all of those criteria and not help with selection at all!
Sadly for his company, in desperate need of this tool, he didn't care at all about the most important element of the assessment - how it's predictive ability made it different from all the assessments he knew about - personality and behavioral styles assessments that are so widely available. Unlike nearly all of the other assessments on the market, our assessment actually predicts, with tremendous accuracy, who will succeed in a sales position at your company. I'll explain.
Take any personality or behavioral styles assessment, and you will likely see one where the individual findings like, "John gets along well with people", will be quite accurate. While the individual findings in most of these assessments are accurate, almost none of them were created for the purpose of assessing sales candidates or evaluating sales forces. Rather, they are usually assessments that were adapted for this use. Adapted means they include some of the traits for which they assess, like Drive or Extroversion, since successful salespeople have those traits. But the traits they measure don't predict sales success. They are, as I said, just some of the traits that successful salespeople have and it's important to note that unsuccessful salespeople usually have those traits too.
Our assessment also has accurate individual findings like, "John doesn't ask enough questions", but notice that they are sales specific findings versus personality traits. So difference number one is that while the other assessments provide accurate traits, ours provides accurate sales findings.
Our assessment is different, not only because it was built SPECIFICALLY for sales use, but because of its predictive nature. Our assessment actually predicts, with accuracy, whether a sales candidate will succeed in the specific sales role that you need filled. While other assessments present a collection of findings, you must interpret them, draw a conclusion and then guess whether John will succeed. Our assessment actually predicts whether John will succeed, not just in sales, but selling your specific product or service at your company, in your industry and with the particular role you have in mind. It predicts whether John will succeed selling into your marketplace, calling on your decision makers against your competition with all of its particular challenges. That's an enormous difference. That's why it's so accurate.
When we evaluate a sales force, one of the things we predict with accuracy is growth potential - whether each of your salespeople will improve and by how much.
Complicating the matter on assessments is the issue of validation - the demonstration or proof that the assessment is consistent and reliable in its findings, where all the n's, r's, alphas, and standard deviation come into play. Validation is important because an assessment can't be used in the work place unless it has been validated.
There are several ways to validate an assessment. They range from methods as simple as face validity, to content validity, to criterion related validity, to construct validity and all the way up to predictive validity, and more.
On the simple end of the spectrum, Face Validity means that at face value, the questions in the assessment seem to test for what the assessment claims it's testing for. Geez!
Content Validity is the degree to which a test is a representative sample of the content of whatever objectives or specifications the test was originally designed to measure. More Geez!
And yes, there are assessments on the market that don't prove any more than that!
Criterion Validity uses strategies that focus on the correlation of the test being correlated with a well-respected outside measure(s) of the same objectives or specifications (like a manager's review).
Construct Validity is the experimental demonstration that a test is measuring the construct (attribute) it claims to be measuring.
Finally, Predictive validity is the degree of correlation between the scores on a test and some other measure that the test is designed to predict (like on the job performance). This is the most time-consuming and costly form of validation and this is the method we use. In the case of the predictive validity of our sales candidate assessment, a year after salespeople have been assessed, 92% of those we recommended who were also hired were performing in the top half of their sales organizations.
That's quite a profound difference from an assessment that says "John gets along well with people".
I know this was a long post but I thought it was important to get this information out.
Top 5 Reasons Why the OMG Sales Assessment is More Predictive
Sales Assessments vs. Personality Assessments Episode III - The PHD's Strike Back
10 Reasons Why Sales Commitment Has Become More Important
Sales Assessment Comparison - Objective Management Group vs. Devine
Personality Assessments for Sales - The Definitive Case Study
Article Tags: accuracy, alphas, behavioral styles, deltas, desperate need, element, extroversion, minorities, personality, phd, predictive ability, sales position, sales success, salespeople, standard deviations, statistician, technical nature, validity, vp
|
About the Author: Dave Kurlan RSS for Dave's articles - Visit Dave's website  Click here to visit Dave's website   Predict Sales Turnover Visual Pipeline Salesperson Selection |
Related Forum Posts
Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional
- Hi Evan,
I am noticing that many of the posts in the Sales/Marketing section deal with online marketing, SEM and and SEO and Affiliates. I was wondering if it might be a good idea to separate that section into two; 1) Online Sales and Marketing; 2) Traditional Sales and Marketing
Re: Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional
- [quote="ltrahan":31w9r2iz]Hi Evan,
I am noticing that many of the posts in the Sales/Marketing section deal with online marketing, SEM and and SEO and Affiliates. I was wondering if it might be a good idea to separate that section into two; 1) Online Sales and Marketing; 2) Traditional Sales and Marketing[/quote:31w9r2iz]
I second the request...
Hello From Marietta GA!
- Hello All!
My name is Tim Naylor and I am in Direct Sales! I am glad I have found EC's sites and I hope to learn and share a lot!
taxes in canada
- Well in Canada we only have a few provinces and the Sales tax is slightly different. Here in Ontario the Goods & Services tax has reduced to 5% from 7% in the last year due to the promises made by the government in place.
Re: Watch What you Read
- I agree. i believe more video's should be like Jeffery Gitomers video's under his Sales rant. They are typically not more than 3 minutes. His model seems to be;
1. Main Message (or Point)
2. Example
3. Next steps to put it into Action
take away the extra "blabber" and you've got viewers that will come back.
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
February 2012 Top 100 Leadership Experts to Follow on Twitter
Please Stop Calling it Coaching!
Measuring the Quality of Your Hires
The fine line 
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Executives and Elevators Perfecting That Pitch
Ten Things You Can Do To Be a Better Leader
E Mail Marketing Campaigns
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.