---

Guest post by: Dave Kurlan Become an Author

Tweet

---

---

Nearly two years ago we began development of an exciting new way to evaluate Executive Management Teams. We brainstormed, conducted surveys, performed research and identified 16 qualities that CEO's wanted their Executive Managers to possess, along with 9 Styles crucial to a Management Team's ability to grow their companies. These Qualities and Styles are not presented in any other assessments on the market today.

Over a period of 18 months, a team of PHD's whose primary expertise is in testing, worked with us to map the formulas, measures, and research of a very well researched personality instrument (the basis for many well known personality tests) to our new Management Assessment. When we were ready to have a small test group take the assessment, the results of round one were not impressive. The scores were very inconsistent with the findings we wanted to present. I was extremely disappointed with our progress.

The project was escalated up to two PHD's with even more expertise. After 6 more months of understanding the findings we wanted to provide and the formulas they had in their "vault", the second round of testing yielded results that were no closer than in the first round. We were failing to get accurate results, running out of patience and running out of time.

I have had many occasions to speak and write about how personality tests, behavioral styles tests and psychometric tests, which are all very similar, differ from Objective Management Group's Sales Force Evaluations and Assessments. As a matter of fact, you can read four such articles right here:

* Top Five Reasons Why the OMG Sales Assessment is More Predictive
* How to Be More Effective Selecting Sales Candidates
* How Are Assessments Used?
* Tale of Two Assessments - Comparing Value

I have always said that personality tests, although they contain several elements that are important for sales, wern't built to predict sales success and, even when modified, can't go wide enough or deep enough to predict likely challenges or diagnose why salespeople get the results they get. As a result, they can not be used as development tools and they are very risky and inconsistent as hiring tools.

So how did we come to go down this path where we were going to use a personality assessment as the instrument behind our new Management Assessment? After all, weren't we being hypocritical?

We were convinced by a PHD/testing expert that the research existed to map to our findings.

Well the research does exist - except - their findings aren't the same as what we want to provide. As with a sales assessment, they're identifying findings that they can measure - like emotional steadiness - and saying they can provide a score for that. Well they can - except, like nearly all of the findings from personality tests, the findings are out of context. The questions have nothing to do with selling or managing and someone who might control their emotions quite well socially, might not be equally effective in a sales or business setting. This example holds true over nearly every one of their findings and the questions they target to drive those findings. So the findings that show up in most personality assessments are not necessarily what you need to know, they are simply what these assessments are capable of measuring!

So back to the story.

We realized that we got away from one of our core competencies - our ability to identify the right questions to uncover the data to provide accurate, predictive, job specific findings. So we wrote the questions, resumed the beta and went about the engineering required to complete the development of this very powerful, very different assessment. As I reviewed the descriptors - the specific traits we would "measure" to reveal our findings - I realized that over the last several months, the PHD's at the personality testing company had gradually and subtly modified the descriptors enough so that we too would report what they were capable of measuring, rather than what we wanted to measure.

So now, when I explain why a personality assessment which wasn't built for sales, isn't predictive or sales specific enough even when modified for sales, we have an 18 month research project that details, demonstrates, and proves, once and for all, that a personality assessment can't measure much more than dimensions of personality and can't predict much more than some basic human behaviors. They just can't measure the things we really want to know about a salesperson's or a sales manager's or an Executive Manager's competencies.

Final Word - stay tuned for our March launch of what will be the most useful assessment to date for your Executive Management Team. I think you'll love it as much as I do.

Related Articles

  Sales Assessment Comparison - Objective Management Group vs. Devine
  Exposed - Personality Tests Disguised as Sales Assessments
  Personality Assessments - They Still Don't Get it
  All-Time Top Kurlan Sales Article
  Top 5 Reasons Why the OMG Sales Assessment is More Predictive
  More Sales Assessment Imposters Exposed
  How to be More Effective Selecting Sales Candidates
  Build Bench Strength through Personality Assessments
  Latest Research on Personality Assessments for Sales Selection
  Paul McCartney, Brian Wilson and the Sales Assessment Industry
  Can Sales Assessments Actually Predict On the Job Sales Success
  Dan Pink Hits and Then Misses the New Key to Sales Performance
  3 New Sales Article Series, A Holiday Tradition and Future Blog #1000
  Increase Sales with Case Studies
  Is there still a use for case studies in PR?
  Another Sales Assessment Takes on OMG - What Does it Reveal?
  Ultimate Comparison of Top Salespeople to Salespeople Who Fail
  Recruiters Fear Sales Assessments
  Sales Assessments vs. Personality Assessments Episode III - The PHD's Strike Back
  Are you making the most of Psychometric Assessments?

Related Forum Posts

Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional
Nana excercise
Re: Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional
Re: How do you get fresh ideas for work?
Picking a corporate lawyer

Share this article. Fund someone's dream.

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Selling Change

Top 5 Tips for Better Online Ads

Green Cleaning Means More Than Clean

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.