Tweet

Some Common Misconceptions about Values

Written by: Bryan Feller

Article Overview: Although values are at the core of leadership, many people may not be completely faithful to the notion of leading according to their personal values. Oftentimes situational demands and inter-value conflicts can cause leaders to spend considerable amounts of time of doing non-values related activities, and doing so can result in diminishing levels of effectiveness.

Some Common Misconceptions about Values

By Gordon Curphy and Robert Hogan

Go into any corporate lobby and chances are you will see a framed copy of the organization’s mission, vision, and values. Whereas the mission and vision describes the purpose or ends of the organization — its reason d’etre, values usually describe the means by which managers and employees are to achieve these ends. It is abundantly clear that values play a pervasive role in human affairs, as they affect virtually every strategy or marketing decision, organizational change initiative, budget allocation, personnel evaluation or interpersonal conflict. Despite the prevalence of values in our day-to-day activities, there appear to be a number of misunderstandings about what values are and the role they play in leadership and organizational life. The purpose of this paper is to provide answers to the following questions: (a) What are values and what role do they play in leadership and organizations? (b) What does it mean to lead "according to one’s values" and is doing so always a good thing?

What are Values?

Simply put, values are a person’s most important and enduring beliefs. When Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death," he was expressing the value he placed on political freedom. When Bernie Ebbers and Scott Sullivan "cooked the books" at Worldcom to the tune of eleven billion dollars, they were expressing the relative importance they placed on personal enrichment versus generally accepted accounting practices. One potential problem with values is that they are quite diverse — people believe in many different things. Some people believe in God and others do not, some think profitability is more important than social justice, and there are opposing beliefs about whether gay marriages should be recognized. But in the world of work, the most important values can be distilled into the ten distinct categories described in Table One.

gravitate towards financially driven solutions whereas leaders with high Recognition values, such as Elliot Spitzer, will only work on problems that provide them with public attention.

Personal values not only affect individual behavior; they also have pervasive team and organizational effects. For example, a leader’s personal values play an important role in shaping the team’s purpose, norms, team member selection, and team member commitment. We once worked with a manufacturing manager who had very high Power, Commercial and Tradition values and low Hedonism, Altruism and Affiliation values. He managed according to his values--using a command and control philosophy that was focused solely on financial results and not caring a whit about people he led. Soon after he was promoted his team became a revolving door of talent, his financial results started to tumble, and he was eventually asked to leave the company.



Because we tend to like people with similar values and dislike people with dissimilar values, most of the time leaders will hire team members who place a premium on the same things. This means that if a leader has hiring latitude, he or she pick team members having similar values. The end result of this process will be a team that shares a similar outlook on the team’s purpose, priorities, and norms and relatively harmonious team relationships. The downside is the systematic discounting of data, problems, and viewpoints that fall outside the team’s collective values. Whereas this one-sided view of world can be problematic enough for sales, manufacturing, or project teams, it can be deadly for top leadership teams. The Bush administration provides a good example here — the inner circle of team members all seem to get along, focus on similar data and problems, share the same sense of purpose, and generally are very good at staying "on message". But data and problems that fall outside the Administration’s core values, such as bad news about Iraq, the 9/11 Commission, stem cell research, or anything to do with the United Nations are systematically discounted, dismissed, or ignored.

The same thing happens in corporations, where the collective values of top leadership are key determinants of organizational strategy and culture. For example, we worked with a group of CEOs from the National Health Service who were responsible for all public, primary, tertiary, and mental health services for 600,000 people in the United Kingdom. The CEOs managed a billion dollar budget and collectively had high Hedonism, Altruism, Affiliation values and low Power and Commercial values. The organization placed a premium on working together, helping others and having fun, and did not believe money or achieving results were particularly important considerations in decision making. Unfortunately, the health care system was $50,000,000 in debt and there were very long queues for surgery; because of these problems the National Health Authority told the CEOs to fix these problems or find something else to do. About six months later all but three of the CEOs had been sacked because of their unwillingness to believe these were serious problems and do anything to address these two issues.

Because the values of top leadership are major factors in organizational strategy and culture, many employees can get mixed signals with respect to the organization’s true versus espoused values. Many organizations state that employees are their number one asset and talent is a key differentiator in their industry. But if headcount, health care benefits, and training and development budgets are among the first things to get cut during financial crises, then it becomes abundantly clear that Commercial values rule the day. In other cases the organization’s true and espoused values may be more aligned but present a different sort of dilemma for leaders. Many organizations explicitly state that improving shareholder value is their number one priority. But a lot of employees do not have high Commercial values — they come to work in order to have an impact (Power), interact with others (Affiliation), or create high quality products (Aesthetic). Many employees would rather have life than work hard to make others money, particularly when the owners (i.e., institutional investors, day traders, and mutual fund managers) often have very little interest in the business other than financial results. All too many leaders have learned that appealing solely to employees’ Commercial values to drive change is often a recipe for failure.

Related to the notion of personal choices, team functioning, and organizational culture is the concept of organizational "fit". No matter how talented an individual may be, if his/her values are inconsistent with the culture, then he or she will sooner or later leave the organization. We worked with the marketing department of a large, multi-modal transportation company; the management group contained 11 men and 1 woman. The men had high scores for Commerce and Power, and low scores for Aesthetics, Affiliation, and Hedonism. The woman, an Asian American with an MBA from Harvard, spoke 5 languages and was in charge of international marketing. She had high scores for Aesthetics, Affiliation, and Hedonism; although we thought she was the most talented person in the group, she lasted only 6 months in the job. Our research has shown that hiring people with values similar to those of the organization will significantly reduce employee turnover; hiring people with dissimilar values will help with strategy, product development, and decision-making but will be harder to retain.

What does it Mean to Lead "According to One’s Values?" As discussed so far, values affect occupational choices, hiring and operational decisions, interpersonal conflict, job satisfaction, retention, team functioning, and ultimately organizational strategy, culture, and results. Given the importance of values in a leader’s day-to-day affairs, one would think that the most effective leaders are those that lead according to their values. It is common knowledge that many popular leadership gurus have endorsed the notion of leading according to one’s values, but what does this really mean? And is leading according to one’s values always a good thing? Surprisingly enough, the answers to these two questions may not be as clear cut as they first appear.

Perhaps the first step in leading according to one’s values is to clearly understand what one’s values really are. Gaining this insight can be as simple as doing the rank ordering exercise or on-line assessment described earlier or spending time reflecting on the key decisions made over one’s career. Any of these activities should allow leaders to understand what is most important, of secondary importance, or relatively unimportant. As stated earlier, when asked, most leaders can describe their key work values. However, whether they are leading according to their values can be entirely another thing.Tthe person in authority can be considered to be leading according to his or her values when his or her values, intentions, behaviors and perceptions are in alignment. In other words, his or her core values drive what the person intends to do as a leader, these intentions drive where the person spend his or her time and what the person can specifically do as a leader, and others’ perceptions of the leader are aligned with these values, intentions, and behaviors.



Although most leaders do have insight into their core values, our research indicates that many do not lead according to their values. The most frequent problem is a disconnect between the leader’s values, what many actually do, and how those actions are perceived by others. For example, the leaders may believe that helping others (Altruism), gathering data before making decisions (Science), and creating a stable and predictable work environment (Security) may be of utmost importance, but if the leaders are in a turn around situation where the leaders must reduce headcount, drive several major organizational change initiatives, and make quick decisions based on gut instinct then the leaders will not be acting in a manner consistent with their values. And based on these behaviors employees will infer that the leaders have a set of values that are very different than their core values.



Although you might think these are rare and relatively temporary occurrences, the high levels mergers and acquisitions and industry consolidation over the past 10-15 years provide fertile ground for these types of events. It is not unusual for the acquiring organization to have a very different set of core values than those of the company they purchased, and the leaders in the acquired company face a dilemma of either leading according to their own or these new values. The same phenomenon occurs when an outside CEO is brought in. These individuals often place many of their friends in key leadership roles (who also happen to share similar values), and the new top leadership team may have very different values than those of the previous regime. Research has shown that either of these situations results in higher executive and middle-level management turnover, and we suspect that this conflict in values is at the heart of these retention problems. Of course, in many ways this turnover in the old regime has advantages from a decision-making and conflict perspective, but the disadvantages include losing alternative perspectives on issues as well as insider knowledge and skills.

Like assessing one’s core values, it is also relatively easy to determine whether a person is leading according to his or her values. Perhaps the simplest way to do this is to determine how someone typically spends his or her time. A quick review of one’s calendar over the past several months can help leaders see what activities are taking up most of their time. An example of a time analysis for a senior level manufacturing leader. We can see that this leader spends a majority of his time in meetings, doing e-mail, and on the phone; the focus of many of these interactions with others had to do with exploring and resolving operational, quality, and financial problems. Given where this leader spends his time, one might assume that he had high Power, Aesthetic, and Commercial values. Although the Power and Aesthetic assumptions would be correct, the leader actually had lower Commercial and higher Altruism values. In reality the leader was spending very little time developing his staff, and this was becoming a major source of work dissatisfaction. Rather than adding another activity to an already hectic schedule, we helped the leader to find ways to better leverage his meetings, e-mail, and telephone in order to coach his staff.



Our research has shown that most leaders do not always lead according to their values — sometimes it is very difficult to completely satisfy competing values (i.e., Altruism and Commercial) and at other times tradeoffs between personal and organizational values will need to be made. We have also found that other leaders are not aware of the degree of misalignment between their personal values and day-to-day behavior. Generally there are few consequences for relatively low levels of misalignment, but leaders who experience significant disconnects between their personal values and behavior over longer periods of time eventually will experience job dissatisfaction and managerial derailment. Because leaders gain energy from doing those activities aligned with their values and doing non-aligned activities can be draining, misaligned leaders, no matter how strong, will not be able to maintain the emotional energy needed to successfully lead teams.

So the happiest and most successful leaders are those who not only understand their values, but have also found positions in companies where what they do and where they spend their time is aligned with these values. So does this mean that leading according to one’s values is always "good"? From the individual leader’s perspective the answer is probably yes, but from a team, enterprise, or society level the answer may be no. For example, there is no doubt that Adolph Hitler was leading according to his values. More recently the same could be said about Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, or Andy Fastow, and history mournfully suggests that these types of leaders can have devastating effects on the companies, movements, and countries they lead. To be more specific, some of the values in Table One, when taken to an extreme, can lead to reprehensible conduct. For example, managers as a group tend to have strong Power and Commerce values and place little importance on Altruism and Security. Strong Power and weak Security values are associated with energy, drive, risk-taking, and upward mobility — essential ingredients of a successful business career. On the other hand, strong Commerce and weak Altruism values are associated with greed and selfishness; when these tendencies are unchecked, they lead to the sort of corporate misbehavior that has been so visible in the news over the past few years. As we have seen in the mutual fund and insurance industries most recently, bad values — greed and selfishness — are one way in which values contribute to managerial and organizational failure.

Summary

Hopefully by now we have presented a compelling case for the importance of values in everyday affairs. Because of their increased ability to make an impact, people with higher Power values often are attracted to leadership positions. Their score on this and their other personal values will dictate what they consider to be problems, the role of and what sort of data they consider to be important, the solutions they apply to problems, the people they choose to associate with, what they enjoy doing, and where they spend their time. Values also play a key role in team function, as the leader’s values will affect the team’s purpose, norms, team membership, and team member commitment. And the personal values of top leadership teams have consequences for organizational vision, strategies, and culture.

Although values are at the core of leadership, many people may not be completely faithful to the notion of leading according to their personal values. Oftentimes situational demands and inter-value conflicts can cause leaders to spend considerable amounts of time of doing non-values related activities, and doing so can result in diminishing levels of effectiveness. On the other hand, it is also possible for team and organizational performance to suffer even when their leaders act in accordance with their values. Leaders having strong Commercial and weak Altruism values often act in a greedy and selfish manner and will surround themselves with like-minded people. Because groups having similar values will often report even more polarized beliefs, these groups will offer plenty of rationale and feel absolutely no remorse when they short-change shareholders, lie to boards, squeeze vendors, and screw employees in the pursuit of the almighty dollar. And this sense of greed and selfishness is precisely why strong codes of ethics, government enforcement agencies, and investigative institutions are so important to the long-term health of corporations.

Related Articles
  Instant Article Writing Template: The Top Mistakes Article Writing Template Explained in Detail
  Your Values and Your Success
  Are You an Ethical Salesperson?
  Reactive vs. Proactive & Core Beliefs
  What are my business values?

Article Tags: accounting practices, bernie ebbers, budget allocation, change initiative, distinct categories, gay marriages, gravitate, human affairs, interpersonal conflict, many different things, mission vision, organizational change, patrick henry, personal enrichment, personnel evaluation, pervasive role, political freedom, relative importance, robert hogan, scott sullivan



Related Forum Posts
Re: Essential Leadership skills - Vision Values Mission Strategic Thinking Decision Making Communication Team Bonding People Development Coaching / Mentoring / Guiding / Grooming Presentation Thanks Robert
Reality in Television - [quote="SueB":2xhla35c]I've been watching Cashmere Mafia but not Lipstick Jungle. What I like about CM is that these incredibly powerful and success business women are imperfect and older. Kudos to Hollywood for hiring 3 lead actresses who are actually 39-40 vs 25 playing older. The 4th is early-mid 30's.... I'm not sure how old the actresses were in Sex and the City when it aired... Imperfect in that they do have challenges balancing the various aspects of their lives. Take Juliet for instance. She's this high-ranking if not head of some large company (I don't really know what she does) yet she let her husband take care of the money! She probably knows the cash flow particulars for her business though. Common error that many women make but that you wouldn't expect a power woman to make. In this week's episode I thought it was rather interesting and perceptive of the Mia character to realize that her ex-fiancee Jack could only be with her if he was on the same level career-wise. Otherwise his self-esteem took a beating and he left. Her fear being that this is a pattern that would continue. Mind you, her character didn't do anything to support his self esteem when they were competing for the same position. Just a few thoughts...[/quote:2xhla35c] Interesting how they are incorporating real life mistakes that many women make and having their characters do the same things. You gave a couple of very good examples. I can't believe the people - male or female - who turn their paychecks over to their spouse or significant other and have no clue where it goes. I have an aunt that did that for 10+ years and then he husband left - with a large chunk of money she didn't know "they" had. Then she got married some years later and did it again. I wonder sometimes what it takes for people to learn a lesson. Shri
Re: HOw to market a B2B consulting company - How about providing a white paper on Common security holes (only mention the ones that the prospect can easily and inexpensively fix themselves). Towards the end explain that there are other greater security flaws that exist and that you provide a "Free Security Consultation and Report". They could use this report to get cheaper quotes but you are getting so much more... you get face time with the company and get to build rapport with them. I know of a company here in Toronto that does Energy Audits on your home and provide you with a report on ways you can save energy- they also also offer to fix it for you through their suppliers. they had a story run on them on Earth Day this year and they were bombarded with over 200 calls in one day to have these audits done. The audits are done for free. You could write up a shocking story on Security and holes that exist within businesses today and submit this story to the newspapers business edition or to a Trade Magazine written for the industry you are trying to serve. Most journalists may pick up this article and feature it or interview you directly. Also, I would redesign your site to be more Information-based to educate potential prospects (how to solve common security issues) rather than it being all about the company - people are more interested in solving their problem and often aren't searching the internet for a particular company by name unless it is well established. So give them juicy information freely. note: When I first heard this idea of giving away free information about solving a problem I was hesitant to use it in my web design business. I gave it a try anyways and the amazing part was that even the easy inexpensive things I advised them they could fix in their websites they offered to pay me to do it for them - from there I was able to upsell them on greater improvements. I've since sold this company - but it was fun!


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

In the Year 2020 . . . Process

Angel Investors Where Are You?

Download a template or see a lawyer?

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.