THE VENDOR PROBLEM: Managing Buy-in From The Outside
THE VENDOR PROBLEM: Managing Buy-in From The Outside
This fact was brought home to me lately after spending the better part of a year working toward securing a contract for training a pilot in a large multinational, and needing to get a complex buying decision from different levels of managers who were being run ragged in their normal business lives.
My internal champion – let’s call him John - couldn’t have been nicer. As the Learning and Development Manager, he became excited about bringing Buying Facilitation into his company after taking a public training with me, and recognized the strength of the material for use in sales, negotiating, presenting, and coaching. He was a dream prospect: loved my material, loved me, and agreed to work together as a team to get the necessary buy-in throughout the company. We knew it would be a long hard process to influence several layers of decision makers who were accustomed to more conventional thinking, but John had a vision to bring Buying Facilitation in as a baseline skill for the entire corporation. We were excited.
COLLABORATING WITH AN INTERNAL COACH
We decided to use the Buying Facilitation process itself as the route into management buy-in, assuming they’d notice that we were using the skills we were going to be teaching. They did, and they were impressed.
I worked right alongside John as a Trusted Advisor, Relationship Manager, Coach, and ultimately, friend. At each phone meeting (we were located in different countries) I carefully listened, questioned, and coached, in order to help us both understand the politics of each upcoming meeting, and then designed Facilitative Questions (which lead people through self-discovery) for him to use at each meeting. As part of pre-planning, I sent him ideas, plans, thought papers, and designed Power Points to assist the decision making, each step of the way. We encouraged cross-team discussions prior to meetings to garner excitement and curiosity.
Understanding systems as I do – the Buying Facilitation Method® is based on examining and shifting the underlying status quo in a way that makes systemic, sustainable change possible (equally effective for helping people change as it is for helping buyers make quick buying decisions) – I understood the underpinnings of each meeting, each comment, each doubt, each difficult conversation. Indeed, I’m uncannily accurate in my focus on the hidden, systemic issues that people need to address for change to happen.
In effect, I did the work of a high level coach as I translated the meanings behind, and designed interventions for, the meetings and the people issues John had to influence. I created the Buying Decision support; John did the implementation as an insider. We certainly were on the road to success.
When we got buy-in from top management, I was thrilled. “Not as happy as I am,” John said. “This means even more to me – a way to bring my values into this company and have them make more money at the same time. I almost have tears in my eyes I’m so happy.”
We continued plotting, planning, whispering, giggling, week after week, month after month. We knew what was going on with each person and meeting. Yes sir, I was in the loop, in control, and in line to not only close a big deal, but to have the opportunity to bring my visionary model into a corporation that would embrace it.
OOPS
All was going well, until John decided to take the last leg of the journey on his own, believing that the ultimate decision maker was good to go: John assumed that the manager had bought in to the need to add new skills. But he hadn’t led him through the Buying Decision Funnel. When John got a note from the manager telling him to go ahead, that he trusted John's capability to do a good job, John didn't question what seemed to be an obvious 'buy' signal. But it wasn't. The manager really didn't know what he was going to be 'buying', most probably assuming it was conventional 'sales' training.
We moved forward writing up contracts, assuming we were done (Do you notice all of the 'assumes' in here?). But then the manager canceled two conference calls with me, and wanted the program price. Because I have a rule to never mention price until people have made a buying decision (people have nothing to base decisions on if they have no buying criteria), price hadn't been mentioned. Now, I gave them the price of the pilot program as John and I had designed it.
You know the rest here: John was fine with the price. But as soon as the manager heard the price, he halved the proposed program, and halved the price. John began negotiating, still not eliciting the man's buy-in criteria. Unfortunately, he had to leave on holiday during the negotiations. By the time John returned, it was dead in the water.
That was it. End. Finish. Kaput. I got a brief, mournful, email saying ‘Sorry’ and a note to feel badly for him because he was angry enough to consider quitting. The time and care and respect we shared was not mentioned. Nor did he thank me. How expendable I was!
I lost a job, income, a lot of time, and, most important, a friend. Dozens of hours of work, phone calls, and creativity, gone. Our relationship and time together wasn’t even worthy of a phone call, or future planning, or further possibilities, or referrals to colleagues in other companies. And how stupid and angry and abused I felt.
MY EGO OVERTOOK MY UNDERSTANDING OF BUYING DECISIONS
In retrospect, I can see the problem – a few of them, actually.
To start with, it was naive to think that we could have orchestrated this decision from so far outside the ultimate pilot group. John was in a different department, not part of the pilot group. I should have insisted he put together a small group of sales folks who bought in to the proposed program and help get agreement from the bottom up, just as he and I were doing from the top down.
And with all of the successes that we had, I was so assured we were ‘done’ that I stopped Facilitating. Much as a football coach sends in the third string when there are 2 minutes left on the clock with a 9 point lead, I left John do the last bit on his own – and we had never discussed the possibility that this manager might not understand, nor believe, he needed what he was being asked to buy.
Next, and even more obvious, was when the final manager cancelled two phone calls with me. How did I not realize that he couldn’t give his approval for time, money, disruption, and change, without fully understanding the Model and implications behind what he was being asked to buy? No one had led him to his own unique decisions, which I had planned to do on the phone. Buying Facilitation is so rigorous: “Where are you, and what’s missing” is the first phase of the decision. This man thought he was fine. Nothing was missing for him. Where Buying Facilitation would open up possibility - "I hear you are happy with your current results. How would you know that adding new skills might give you even better results?" - we did nothing. I was not there to do it, and John didn't challenge him.
In a company I was not a part of, with a group that I didn’t belong to, offering a solution that I knew was different from their accustomed conventional thinking, my odds were bad, even though they had a real need, and I had a wonderful internal Coach, a wonderful product, and a wonderful Model to use to elicit buy-in.
The glaring problem was that it never occurred to me that I wouldn't close the deal. After all, I’ve done the same thing successfully (coaching an internal prospect through to purchase) many times before. I got lazy, is what happened. In the end, I left too much of the final leadership to John. And he was so thrilled in the beginning by the ‘ease’ of getting agreement (the beauty of Buying Facilitation of course), that, in the end, he also got lazy. My bad.
WHO ARE WE AS VENDORS?
The larger question this brings up is a universal one: If I was treated like this by someone who has known me and trained with me, respects me and trusts me, I’m assuming that all of us in the B2B market have this same issue over and over again.
One of the biggest problems with being a vendor is being outside the system, outside of the corporate politics - the rules, roles, relationships, politics, history, initiatives, and finances, which make up a Company. And in most purchasing decisions, vendors are dependent on an internal Coach’s ability to:
* read the people and internal politics accurately, with a minimum bias,
* give us the type of data we need to design the best Facilitative Questions to lead them through the decisions the decision team will need to make;
* be willing to lead, promote, influence buy-in and design a solution with us in it.
Buyers have to do this all anyway - with us or without us. And the time it takes them to do it is the length of the sales cycle.
The second problem is that we approach sales as if it were a problem-need-product-solution issue, rather than a decision-making/buy-in issue first. And before anything else happens, people must decide to buy-in to changing whatever they need to change – sometimes things that are originally unconscious.
We can either sit back and wait until they figure this out (or not), or get involved, right from the beginning, to lead them through their buy-in process. The biggest ego hurdle is to recognize that our beginning conversation must assist a prospect's discovery of their unique and systemic internal buy-in: without the ability to manage all decision factors, propsects will take no action no matter how great the need or appropriate the solution. And, as outsiders, we can't know all of the players, their relationships, their job responsibilities, or the subtle nuances that end up creating the way change happens and their decisions get made. We know our product as well as they know their internal decision issues. But we sometimes confuse the two.
PRODUCT SALE VS. DECISION SUPPORT
All sellers get caught up in this problem. In order to help prospects make the appropriate set of internal decisions, we must learn to:
* support their decision making while not part of their team or cognizant of the range of decisions to be made;
* hear, and respond to, the issues they are dealing with without attempting to manipulate or push our product;
* lead them to buy-in using their own internal politics, relationships, rules/roles, and personal biases, without being seen as merely a mouthpiece for our own organization.
But the problem is with 'sales'. Sellers have not been given the tools to lead prospects through their full range of decision issues. We know how to place a product, gather problem data and do needs analysis. But sales only recognizes a fraction of the idiosyncratic decision issues that buyers need to manage, and doesn't even acknowledge that there is a daily and must be addressed and managed in some way before the buyer can buy. As sellers, we tend to see the Identified Problem as if that were the only problem, and act as if that problem were an isolated event.
A good solution and a trustworthy vendor are merely the outcomes prospects seek once their internal decisions are made.
Buying Facilitation actually leads the buyer through their systems-based decision making issues separate from product decisions. But even using Buying Facilitation won’t work if we let our egos get involved in attempting to control the buyer, or assume that because we’re liked, have a good product, or are trustworthy/best/friendly – whatever – they will buy.
We actually have little to do with whether or not they end up in a position to buy, unless we can truly enter their environment as true decision facilitation supporters.
WISH LIST FOR PROSPECT MANAGEMENT
As I think about this problem, I think it would be great if we could create some rules for Prospect Management. Here’s my Wish List for us to use with our Prospects to ensure mutual respect and creativity. I sure I’m not getting it right, but it’s a start. Note that my baseline assumption is that we, as vendors, are working with an internal coach who will lead the charge to garner buy-in, and that the coach is committed to help our product get into the company.
1. set up activity, responsibility, and delegation boundaries at the beginning. Before leading the prospect through all of the necessary decisions, write up agreements. Here are the ones I should have made:
a. hire me as a coach to monitor and manage the direction of the process and design the Facilitative Questions. We will either work on a retainer or agree to so many hours a week. This will ensure we both have skin in the game. If we end up signing a contract, I will refund the coaching fees against the first invoice.
b. design a working plan of what the decision process will probably look like and the sorts of decisions needed to ensure buy-in.
c. know what the end result should look like and work toward that goal.
d. know what failure might look like each step of the way, so we’ll know when it’s time to stop and take stock.
e. recognize which groups make which decisions, and annotate up front the types of decisions necessary for each group so we can follow and evaluate the process.
2. get agreement up front as to how to work together, and expectations.
3. clearly agree to lines and modes of communication.
4. set up weekly meetings in advance, with guesstimates of times and dates of meetings. These will shift, of course.
I don’t know the right answers here, but it’s an important conversation to begin. After all, we all truly care about our prospects. And it wouldn’t it be lovely if our prospects really cared about us.
THE VENDOR PROBLEM Managing Buyin From The Outside - To learn more about this author, visit Sharon Drew Morgen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
I don't know about what it's like for you as a vendor. But for me, it's become a hard place to be.
This fact was brought home to me lately after spending the better part of a year working toward securing a contract for training a pilot in a large multinational, and needing to get a complex buying decision from different levels of managers who were being run ragged in their normal business lives.
My internal champion – let’s call him John - couldn’t have been nicer. As the Learning and Development Manager, he became excited about bringing Buying Facilitation into his company after taking a public training with me, and recognized the strength of the material for use in sales, negotiating, presenting, and coaching. He was a dream prospect: loved my material, loved me, and agreed to work together as a team to get the necessary buy-in throughout the company. We knew it would be a long hard process to influence several layers of decision makers who were accustomed to more conventional thinking, but John had a vision to bring Buying Facilitation in as a baseline skill for the entire corporation. We were excited.
COLLABORATING WITH AN INTERNAL COACH
We decided to use the Buying Facilitation process itself as the route into management buy-in, assuming they’d notice that we were using the skills we were going to be teaching. They did, and they were impressed.
I worked right alongside John as a Trusted Advisor, Relationship Manager, Coach, and ultimately, friend. At each phone meeting (we were located in different countries) I carefully listened, questioned, and coached, in order to help us both understand the politics of each upcoming meeting, and then designed Facilitative Questions (which lead people through self-discovery) for him to use at each meeting. As part of pre-planning, I sent him ideas, plans, thought papers, and designed Power Points to assist the decision making, each step of the way. We encouraged cross-team discussions prior to meetings to garner excitement and curiosity.
Understanding systems as I do – the Buying Facilitation Method® is based on examining and shifting the underlying status quo in a way that makes systemic, sustainable change possible (equally effective for helping people change as it is for helping buyers make quick buying decisions) – I understood the underpinnings of each meeting, each comment, each doubt, each difficult conversation. Indeed, I’m uncannily accurate in my focus on the hidden, systemic issues that people need to address for change to happen.
In effect, I did the work of a high level coach as I translated the meanings behind, and designed interventions for, the meetings and the people issues John had to influence. I created the Buying Decision support; John did the implementation as an insider. We certainly were on the road to success.
When we got buy-in from top management, I was thrilled. “Not as happy as I am,” John said. “This means even more to me – a way to bring my values into this company and have them make more money at the same time. I almost have tears in my eyes I’m so happy.”
We continued plotting, planning, whispering, giggling, week after week, month after month. We knew what was going on with each person and meeting. Yes sir, I was in the loop, in control, and in line to not only close a big deal, but to have the opportunity to bring my visionary model into a corporation that would embrace it.
OOPS
All was going well, until John decided to take the last leg of the journey on his own, believing that the ultimate decision maker was good to go: John assumed that the manager had bought in to the need to add new skills. But he hadn’t led him through the Buying Decision Funnel. When John got a note from the manager telling him to go ahead, that he trusted John's capability to do a good job, John didn't question what seemed to be an obvious 'buy' signal. But it wasn't. The manager really didn't know what he was going to be 'buying', most probably assuming it was conventional 'sales' training.
We moved forward writing up contracts, assuming we were done (Do you notice all of the 'assumes' in here?). But then the manager canceled two conference calls with me, and wanted the program price. Because I have a rule to never mention price until people have made a buying decision (people have nothing to base decisions on if they have no buying criteria), price hadn't been mentioned. Now, I gave them the price of the pilot program as John and I had designed it.
You know the rest here: John was fine with the price. But as soon as the manager heard the price, he halved the proposed program, and halved the price. John began negotiating, still not eliciting the man's buy-in criteria. Unfortunately, he had to leave on holiday during the negotiations. By the time John returned, it was dead in the water.
That was it. End. Finish. Kaput. I got a brief, mournful, email saying ‘Sorry’ and a note to feel badly for him because he was angry enough to consider quitting. The time and care and respect we shared was not mentioned. Nor did he thank me. How expendable I was!
I lost a job, income, a lot of time, and, most important, a friend. Dozens of hours of work, phone calls, and creativity, gone. Our relationship and time together wasn’t even worthy of a phone call, or future planning, or further possibilities, or referrals to colleagues in other companies. And how stupid and angry and abused I felt.
MY EGO OVERTOOK MY UNDERSTANDING OF BUYING DECISIONS
In retrospect, I can see the problem – a few of them, actually.
To start with, it was naive to think that we could have orchestrated this decision from so far outside the ultimate pilot group. John was in a different department, not part of the pilot group. I should have insisted he put together a small group of sales folks who bought in to the proposed program and help get agreement from the bottom up, just as he and I were doing from the top down.
And with all of the successes that we had, I was so assured we were ‘done’ that I stopped Facilitating. Much as a football coach sends in the third string when there are 2 minutes left on the clock with a 9 point lead, I left John do the last bit on his own – and we had never discussed the possibility that this manager might not understand, nor believe, he needed what he was being asked to buy.
Next, and even more obvious, was when the final manager cancelled two phone calls with me. How did I not realize that he couldn’t give his approval for time, money, disruption, and change, without fully understanding the Model and implications behind what he was being asked to buy? No one had led him to his own unique decisions, which I had planned to do on the phone. Buying Facilitation is so rigorous: “Where are you, and what’s missing” is the first phase of the decision. This man thought he was fine. Nothing was missing for him. Where Buying Facilitation would open up possibility - "I hear you are happy with your current results. How would you know that adding new skills might give you even better results?" - we did nothing. I was not there to do it, and John didn't challenge him.
In a company I was not a part of, with a group that I didn’t belong to, offering a solution that I knew was different from their accustomed conventional thinking, my odds were bad, even though they had a real need, and I had a wonderful internal Coach, a wonderful product, and a wonderful Model to use to elicit buy-in.
The glaring problem was that it never occurred to me that I wouldn't close the deal. After all, I’ve done the same thing successfully (coaching an internal prospect through to purchase) many times before. I got lazy, is what happened. In the end, I left too much of the final leadership to John. And he was so thrilled in the beginning by the ‘ease’ of getting agreement (the beauty of Buying Facilitation of course), that, in the end, he also got lazy. My bad.
WHO ARE WE AS VENDORS?
The larger question this brings up is a universal one: If I was treated like this by someone who has known me and trained with me, respects me and trusts me, I’m assuming that all of us in the B2B market have this same issue over and over again.
One of the biggest problems with being a vendor is being outside the system, outside of the corporate politics - the rules, roles, relationships, politics, history, initiatives, and finances, which make up a Company. And in most purchasing decisions, vendors are dependent on an internal Coach’s ability to:
* read the people and internal politics accurately, with a minimum bias,
* give us the type of data we need to design the best Facilitative Questions to lead them through the decisions the decision team will need to make;
* be willing to lead, promote, influence buy-in and design a solution with us in it.
Buyers have to do this all anyway - with us or without us. And the time it takes them to do it is the length of the sales cycle.
The second problem is that we approach sales as if it were a problem-need-product-solution issue, rather than a decision-making/buy-in issue first. And before anything else happens, people must decide to buy-in to changing whatever they need to change – sometimes things that are originally unconscious.
We can either sit back and wait until they figure this out (or not), or get involved, right from the beginning, to lead them through their buy-in process. The biggest ego hurdle is to recognize that our beginning conversation must assist a prospect's discovery of their unique and systemic internal buy-in: without the ability to manage all decision factors, propsects will take no action no matter how great the need or appropriate the solution. And, as outsiders, we can't know all of the players, their relationships, their job responsibilities, or the subtle nuances that end up creating the way change happens and their decisions get made. We know our product as well as they know their internal decision issues. But we sometimes confuse the two.
PRODUCT SALE VS. DECISION SUPPORT
All sellers get caught up in this problem. In order to help prospects make the appropriate set of internal decisions, we must learn to:
* support their decision making while not part of their team or cognizant of the range of decisions to be made;
* hear, and respond to, the issues they are dealing with without attempting to manipulate or push our product;
* lead them to buy-in using their own internal politics, relationships, rules/roles, and personal biases, without being seen as merely a mouthpiece for our own organization.
But the problem is with 'sales'. Sellers have not been given the tools to lead prospects through their full range of decision issues. We know how to place a product, gather problem data and do needs analysis. But sales only recognizes a fraction of the idiosyncratic decision issues that buyers need to manage, and doesn't even acknowledge that there is a daily and must be addressed and managed in some way before the buyer can buy. As sellers, we tend to see the Identified Problem as if that were the only problem, and act as if that problem were an isolated event.
A good solution and a trustworthy vendor are merely the outcomes prospects seek once their internal decisions are made.
Buying Facilitation actually leads the buyer through their systems-based decision making issues separate from product decisions. But even using Buying Facilitation won’t work if we let our egos get involved in attempting to control the buyer, or assume that because we’re liked, have a good product, or are trustworthy/best/friendly – whatever – they will buy.
We actually have little to do with whether or not they end up in a position to buy, unless we can truly enter their environment as true decision facilitation supporters.
WISH LIST FOR PROSPECT MANAGEMENT
As I think about this problem, I think it would be great if we could create some rules for Prospect Management. Here’s my Wish List for us to use with our Prospects to ensure mutual respect and creativity. I sure I’m not getting it right, but it’s a start. Note that my baseline assumption is that we, as vendors, are working with an internal coach who will lead the charge to garner buy-in, and that the coach is committed to help our product get into the company.
1. set up activity, responsibility, and delegation boundaries at the beginning. Before leading the prospect through all of the necessary decisions, write up agreements. Here are the ones I should have made:
a. hire me as a coach to monitor and manage the direction of the process and design the Facilitative Questions. We will either work on a retainer or agree to so many hours a week. This will ensure we both have skin in the game. If we end up signing a contract, I will refund the coaching fees against the first invoice.
b. design a working plan of what the decision process will probably look like and the sorts of decisions needed to ensure buy-in.
c. know what the end result should look like and work toward that goal.
d. know what failure might look like each step of the way, so we’ll know when it’s time to stop and take stock.
e. recognize which groups make which decisions, and annotate up front the types of decisions necessary for each group so we can follow and evaluate the process.
2. get agreement up front as to how to work together, and expectations.
3. clearly agree to lines and modes of communication.
4. set up weekly meetings in advance, with guesstimates of times and dates of meetings. These will shift, of course.
I don’t know the right answers here, but it’s an important conversation to begin. After all, we all truly care about our prospects. And it wouldn’t it be lovely if our prospects really cared about us.
THE VENDOR PROBLEM Managing Buyin From The Outside - To learn more about this author, visit Sharon Drew Morgen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Cheryl MatthynssensCheryl is a life skills coach, licensed Chemical Dependency Counselor and a 20 year entrepreneur. Cheryl's dedication to achieving a life of balance led to her expanding her teaching from the simple managing of life's daily challenges to adding financial well being as well. A direct marketer with DrinkACT, she is gaining ground in the online community with her concepts of making sure business owners, entreprenuers and employees have well rounded life styles. She opened up a small affiliate site - The Balance Guide- to help others find resources for mental and emotional well being. Visit Cheryl's blog to see more of the diversity beyond business she has began offering online at www.thebalanceguide.blogspot.com - Visit Cheryl Matthynssens's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Sharon Drew's articles
 |
|
Sharon Drew Morgen - Home of the Buying Facilitation Method - Helps buyers manage their buying decision.
|
|
 |
 |
|
Sharon Drew Morgen Video - By Sharon Drew Morgen - Buying Facilitation® is a selling system that I developed 20 years ago. It assumes that before buyers consider resolving an Identified Problem, it must ensure that the underlying system that has created and maintained the need is left in tact.
|
|
|
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Write A Bestseller The Leadership Edge Mental Imagery Recession Proof Find It. Use It. |
|
 | ||
 |
Top 50 Marketing Blogs
Top Marketing Blogs of 2009 | |
 |
Top 50 Blogs For Startups
Top Blogs To Watch In 2008 | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||