The Fear and Loathing of Sales Training
The Fear and Loathing of Sales Training
The Challenge
In a study conducted of VPs of sales, HR organizations, Chief Learning Officers, and training directors across a broad sampling of industries completed in the last quarter of 2005, ES Research Group (ESR) found that 41% of respondents said that their companies did not use any sales methodology at all or, alternatively, employed a “style” of selling rather than a proven set of processes (consultative selling or generic solution selling are examples).
Fourteen percent of respondents provided unique names of methodologies their companies used that no other respondents listed. Some of those “methodologies” were actually titles of popular and not-so-popular sales books. (We have observed that in some companies the number of sales approaches used was equal to the number of sales reps.)
This study, as well as a look at the leading (as defined by name recognition) twenty or so sales training/consulting providers, indicates that there is no real leader in the sales training provider market. Companies that were leaders in the past have been acquired or have shrunk in size due to a number of reasons, including their best talent leaving to form their own competitive companies, and an unwillingness to invest in product development, delivery mechanisms, channels, end-user technology and tools.
Our research shows that only 18% of those we interviewed had a formal process for ongoing assessment of their sales training requirements, and even fewer (8%) specifically measured the effectiveness of their sales training initiatives.
Methodology Comes First
From our research, surveys and decades of experience in the field, ESR believes that the right sales approach consists of sales training that supports a company’s sales methodology and related processes. When companies do decide that sales training is a step in the right direction, they do not always proceed forward for the right reasons, in the right order, or in a way that results in them driving more revenue.
Why Some VPs of Sales Don’t Invest in Training
As the result of many interviews we found that numbers of sales VPs don’t invest in training their people at all. Some of the reasons given are that:
They don’t believe sales training works, since they themselves were never trained to sell as part of a corporate strategy. Many went through a spectrum of training programs when they were sales people themselves, but no single one made a lasting difference in their own ability to sell.
They believe they have too few sales people to warrant training.
They cannot get budget allocated for sales training within their organizations because they are unable to present a credible business case.
They will not invest in training because they are compensated on operating income and training is seen as a large expense.
They will not allocate the time to have their sales people trained, feeling it takes away from selling time.
They believe they hire top sales people who don’t need training. Anyone who does not make quota is replaced, so there is no need to train.
They have no idea how to engage with a sales training company and out of fear of failure, they do nothing.
They have invested in a CRM system and feel that this is all the process that their salespeople need.
Their sales people tell management that they’ve been through all the training they need and that it is just a disruption.
Some Reasons VPs of Sales Do Invest in Training
We have found that when they do select a training company, many sales VPs reported doing so for one or more of the following reasons:
They are now facing, or have been facing obstacles in winning against a specific competitor or group of competitors.
Their customers are buying differently and their sales teams have been unable to adapt their approach to what is required to close business.
They feel that sales training is something that “should” happen, and therefore feel an obligation to bring in a trainer to fill a day or two during the annual or quarterly sales meeting.
They have new products or services to sell and their sales people are not trained on how to accomplish that.
Sales forecasts are missed, good sales talent leaves, management no longer has the ability to lead the team in an effective way; so sales training is looked at as the universal elixir.
Sales management feels their people need to be motivated, so a trainer is brought in to rally the troops.
Here is How Many Training/Consulting Providers Are Found
When companies did engage with a sales training/consulting provider, here is how many reported selecting those companies:
They engaged with a training provider with whom they have worked in the past as a known entity, even if the results were not what were expected or conditions, markets, companies, or situations have radically changed.
They hired a company that they believed to have the hottest new approach, or a trainer who wrote a book with what is purported to be a solution to the company’s problem.
They attended a promotional presentation and are impressed with the quality and style of the trainer.
They attended a conference for sales executives and were sold to by one of the participating vendors.
The searched the Internet until they find a trainer whose offerings were appealing.
They got a recommendation from a top sales performer from within their group.
Issues Around Sales Training and Consulting
Once companies engaged with a sales training/consulting provider, they were often beset with the following issues:
The company never defined their precise requirements. Nor did they insist upon explaining their challenges and situation to the training company. The trainer had little idea of precisely what to address and how to address it.
The company itself or the training/consulting provider never spoke with customers who would be able to provide them with insight into what they needed from sales people in order to buy.
The training company/consultant never interviewed the most effective sales performers to determine, from their perspective, what works and what does not, as points of reference.
The trainer had not sold in that company’s environment and therefore had no credibility in front of the experienced sales people.
A different trainer showed up than was discussed with the provider during contract time.
The training curriculum was generic, rigid, and dated and did not address the very specific issues that were preventing sales success.
Executive management did not participate in or even support the training effort, leaving the sales people feeling the effort was not critical and not to be taken seriously.
Sales management was not trained on how to support the new skills and practices of the sales team.
The training was done tactically, not in support of the use of a formal methodology.
The tools that were provided by the trainer were either not suited to helping the sales people win business or far too complex for them to use.
The trainer did not understand or support what the company currently has in place regarding processes, common language, and best-practices, so what they delivered confused and sent mixed messages to the sales team.
As sales people left or were let go, there was no plan to get their replacements up to speed.
The trainer only lectured, providing no opportunity for the salespeople to practice and apply the skills they were being taught.
Workshops within the training program had no connection to the real world of selling for the participants.
Once the event had concluded there was no follow-up to support the sales people and management, to track progress against goals, to adjust processes to fit ever-changing situations, and no measurement of improvement upon which to justify additional investment.
Some Results of Sales Training Initiatives
The following are the results of many typical internal or external sales training programs or initiatives:
Since no specific objectives or goals were set in advance, there was no way to measure success, if there was success.
There was a lack of compliance among the sales team with new procedures and processes introduced during training.
A quick hit to the company’s revenue performance was often the result of a few new “tricks” being learned and a motivational boost, but the trend quickly died. Key strategies and skills necessary for long-term improvement were not taught, or if they were, were not supported through the company’s methodology.
The Case for Sales Training
Not enough companies have learned how to employ sales training as a strategic tool. Those that have are leaders in their industries, offering their stakeholders maximum return on equity, are able to quickly adapt to changing market conditions, are respected by their customers, and provide rock-solid, consistent sales performance. The sales people that work for those companies are motivated, stay at their jobs longer and are proud to helping in recruiting their friends who have been successful selling for other companies. That improves the “blood line” and saves on recruiting fees.
Quite often sales managers and executives don’t have the time and experience to do this correctly. Companies with internal training organizations often provide guidance, but sales training is quite different from designing and delivering training to other constituencies within an organization, such as customer care, engineering, or human resources.
The first step for any company deciding to make a change in their sales approach is always an assessment of the situation. What processes and methods are currently being employed by the company? What has their sales performance been? What percentage of sales people are delivering against plan? What are the biggest obstacles to success? How dynamic or stable is the company’s environment? What are the practices and expectations of the buyers? Those are only a few considerations.
Designing or adopting a sales methodology is critical. Without that methodology in place, training is a tactical attempt to fix a larger problem. The selling methodology must be developed based upon the company’s unique situation—their market, their customers, how those customers buy, the complexity and price levels of the products and services the company offers, competitive pressures, reporting requirements, the participation of partners, the skill level of their current sales people, etc.
Once Again, The Methodology Comes First
The methodology with its processes, supporting tools, measurements, and feedback mechanisms for ongoing improvement becomes the basis of most training that will take place. The overall goal of sales training is to advance compliance with and use of the sales methodology across the organization. Some training provides sales people with ancillary, generic skills, but successful companies train to their processes.
When a factor changes in a company’s environment, such as a new competitor, an economic downturn (or upturn for that matter), or the introduction of a new product, adjustments must be made to the processes and supporting tools first. Then the sales people should be trained to understand and adapt to those changes. If the methodology isn’t adjusted to meet new demands, training will encourage the sales team not to use the methodology any further. Keeping them all focused on the same approach will become difficult.
Some companies are capable of designing a new methodology or adapting to an existing one, but many are not. Resources may be focused on other tasks, do not have the skills, or cannot muster the support of key people within their organization. Designing, installing, implementing and managing a sales methodology requires help and support from every function within a corporation. Outside assistance is often required.
Potential Conflict of Interest?
We have seen highly successful cases where companies brought in training firms to help with methodology design. In other instances the results weren’t as expected as most sales training companies have a unique philosophy and therefore a specialized approach. Perhaps they are strong in the area of selling business value to executives at the expense of competitive positioning. Perhaps attention on strategies for winning very complex sales situations dilutes their efforts toward working with students on the details and tactics that they need to execute in order to win—down to the actual words they need to be saying and to whom.
A training company that specializes in one or more areas of sales expertise will not necessarily perceive or look for your requirements in other areas. If the training/consulting provider is left to define your approach, there will likely be a gap in the methodology, and of course a resultant gap in the subsequent training.
One way to handle this is to engage with two independent providers. One would assist in assessing your situation, defining your requirements, and perhaps in building your methodology. The second would provide the training and would be evaluated and selected based upon their ability to meet your specific (and complete) requirement set. That would assure that the first provider would not be defining your requirements to meet their curriculum.
The best alternative is to engage with a firm that is completely independent of any training or sales consulting provider, and that can offer the proper guidance throughout these steps to assure in the best possible result.
From Methodology Development to Training
Once you have a methodology in place, you can begin defining and formalizing your training requirements. Some of these will be methodology specific. For example, you may need a training provider who specializes in selling to the government, or one who stresses executive-level sales skills, such as required by companies selling management consulting to the Fortune 500.
Other training requirements should include program curricula, degree of interactivity, pre- and post-program assignments, ongoing support and follow-up, tools with which the sales team will do their jobs more effectively, among other critical criteria.
Needless to say, when considering both the sales consultant and the training provider, their company philosophy, viability, experience, proven successes, approach, and, of course, their people are absolutely critical success factors.
…And Measurement
Important to any company that makes an investment seeking improvement is measurement. Benchmarking current levels of performance, setting reasonable goals and objectives based upon a careful assessment of the situation, and measuring progress against those goals is a necessary, but for the large part overlooked component of most training initiatives.
When progress is at or above plan, all stakeholders are encouraged, motivated, and continue to perform and excel. If expectations are not being met, the opportunity exists for immediate problem diagnosis and adjustment, assuring that the initiative will get back on track and provide the return on investment expected.
Many VPs of sales have told ESR that they cannot get funding for retooling their sales approach—revitalizing or building a new sales methodology and providing the appropriate training—because they simply can’t say to the CEO, “For every dollar we invest in sales effectiveness this year, we’ll generate $1.55 in incremental sales.”
What Do You Do Now?
Now is the time for sales managers to demonstrate their leadership by taking an approach—the right approach—for achieving sales effectiveness within their organizations.
1. Determine that you will establish a formal sales approach suitable for your company.
2. Define your requirements and build or adopt a sales methodology, getting outside assistance if needed, before embarking on sales training.
3. Take the time and effort to evaluate, select, and manage the ongoing relationship with the sales training provider that best meets your requirements.
This article was excerpted from a three-part ESR/Insight™ brief, How Effective is Your Sales Approach.
(c) 2006 -- ES Research Group -- All Rights Reserved
The Fear and Loathing of Sales Training - To learn more about this author, visit Dave Stein's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Few VPs of sales use their own, differentiated sales methodology and strategic, ongoing sales training as a strategy to gain and maintain competitive advantage. There are a host of reasons for that, as you will see. You will also notice that the responsibility for employing this strategy effectively lies with both the companies seeking help as well as those providing it.
The Challenge
In a study conducted of VPs of sales, HR organizations, Chief Learning Officers, and training directors across a broad sampling of industries completed in the last quarter of 2005, ES Research Group (ESR) found that 41% of respondents said that their companies did not use any sales methodology at all or, alternatively, employed a “style” of selling rather than a proven set of processes (consultative selling or generic solution selling are examples).
Fourteen percent of respondents provided unique names of methodologies their companies used that no other respondents listed. Some of those “methodologies” were actually titles of popular and not-so-popular sales books. (We have observed that in some companies the number of sales approaches used was equal to the number of sales reps.)
This study, as well as a look at the leading (as defined by name recognition) twenty or so sales training/consulting providers, indicates that there is no real leader in the sales training provider market. Companies that were leaders in the past have been acquired or have shrunk in size due to a number of reasons, including their best talent leaving to form their own competitive companies, and an unwillingness to invest in product development, delivery mechanisms, channels, end-user technology and tools.
Our research shows that only 18% of those we interviewed had a formal process for ongoing assessment of their sales training requirements, and even fewer (8%) specifically measured the effectiveness of their sales training initiatives.
Methodology Comes First
From our research, surveys and decades of experience in the field, ESR believes that the right sales approach consists of sales training that supports a company’s sales methodology and related processes. When companies do decide that sales training is a step in the right direction, they do not always proceed forward for the right reasons, in the right order, or in a way that results in them driving more revenue.
Why Some VPs of Sales Don’t Invest in Training
As the result of many interviews we found that numbers of sales VPs don’t invest in training their people at all. Some of the reasons given are that:
They don’t believe sales training works, since they themselves were never trained to sell as part of a corporate strategy. Many went through a spectrum of training programs when they were sales people themselves, but no single one made a lasting difference in their own ability to sell.
They believe they have too few sales people to warrant training.
They cannot get budget allocated for sales training within their organizations because they are unable to present a credible business case.
They will not invest in training because they are compensated on operating income and training is seen as a large expense.
They will not allocate the time to have their sales people trained, feeling it takes away from selling time.
They believe they hire top sales people who don’t need training. Anyone who does not make quota is replaced, so there is no need to train.
They have no idea how to engage with a sales training company and out of fear of failure, they do nothing.
They have invested in a CRM system and feel that this is all the process that their salespeople need.
Their sales people tell management that they’ve been through all the training they need and that it is just a disruption.
Some Reasons VPs of Sales Do Invest in Training
We have found that when they do select a training company, many sales VPs reported doing so for one or more of the following reasons:
They are now facing, or have been facing obstacles in winning against a specific competitor or group of competitors.
Their customers are buying differently and their sales teams have been unable to adapt their approach to what is required to close business.
They feel that sales training is something that “should” happen, and therefore feel an obligation to bring in a trainer to fill a day or two during the annual or quarterly sales meeting.
They have new products or services to sell and their sales people are not trained on how to accomplish that.
Sales forecasts are missed, good sales talent leaves, management no longer has the ability to lead the team in an effective way; so sales training is looked at as the universal elixir.
Sales management feels their people need to be motivated, so a trainer is brought in to rally the troops.
Here is How Many Training/Consulting Providers Are Found
When companies did engage with a sales training/consulting provider, here is how many reported selecting those companies:
They engaged with a training provider with whom they have worked in the past as a known entity, even if the results were not what were expected or conditions, markets, companies, or situations have radically changed.
They hired a company that they believed to have the hottest new approach, or a trainer who wrote a book with what is purported to be a solution to the company’s problem.
They attended a promotional presentation and are impressed with the quality and style of the trainer.
They attended a conference for sales executives and were sold to by one of the participating vendors.
The searched the Internet until they find a trainer whose offerings were appealing.
They got a recommendation from a top sales performer from within their group.
Issues Around Sales Training and Consulting
Once companies engaged with a sales training/consulting provider, they were often beset with the following issues:
The company never defined their precise requirements. Nor did they insist upon explaining their challenges and situation to the training company. The trainer had little idea of precisely what to address and how to address it.
The company itself or the training/consulting provider never spoke with customers who would be able to provide them with insight into what they needed from sales people in order to buy.
The training company/consultant never interviewed the most effective sales performers to determine, from their perspective, what works and what does not, as points of reference.
The trainer had not sold in that company’s environment and therefore had no credibility in front of the experienced sales people.
A different trainer showed up than was discussed with the provider during contract time.
The training curriculum was generic, rigid, and dated and did not address the very specific issues that were preventing sales success.
Executive management did not participate in or even support the training effort, leaving the sales people feeling the effort was not critical and not to be taken seriously.
Sales management was not trained on how to support the new skills and practices of the sales team.
The training was done tactically, not in support of the use of a formal methodology.
The tools that were provided by the trainer were either not suited to helping the sales people win business or far too complex for them to use.
The trainer did not understand or support what the company currently has in place regarding processes, common language, and best-practices, so what they delivered confused and sent mixed messages to the sales team.
As sales people left or were let go, there was no plan to get their replacements up to speed.
The trainer only lectured, providing no opportunity for the salespeople to practice and apply the skills they were being taught.
Workshops within the training program had no connection to the real world of selling for the participants.
Once the event had concluded there was no follow-up to support the sales people and management, to track progress against goals, to adjust processes to fit ever-changing situations, and no measurement of improvement upon which to justify additional investment.
Some Results of Sales Training Initiatives
The following are the results of many typical internal or external sales training programs or initiatives:
Since no specific objectives or goals were set in advance, there was no way to measure success, if there was success.
There was a lack of compliance among the sales team with new procedures and processes introduced during training.
A quick hit to the company’s revenue performance was often the result of a few new “tricks” being learned and a motivational boost, but the trend quickly died. Key strategies and skills necessary for long-term improvement were not taught, or if they were, were not supported through the company’s methodology.
The Case for Sales Training
Not enough companies have learned how to employ sales training as a strategic tool. Those that have are leaders in their industries, offering their stakeholders maximum return on equity, are able to quickly adapt to changing market conditions, are respected by their customers, and provide rock-solid, consistent sales performance. The sales people that work for those companies are motivated, stay at their jobs longer and are proud to helping in recruiting their friends who have been successful selling for other companies. That improves the “blood line” and saves on recruiting fees.
Quite often sales managers and executives don’t have the time and experience to do this correctly. Companies with internal training organizations often provide guidance, but sales training is quite different from designing and delivering training to other constituencies within an organization, such as customer care, engineering, or human resources.
The first step for any company deciding to make a change in their sales approach is always an assessment of the situation. What processes and methods are currently being employed by the company? What has their sales performance been? What percentage of sales people are delivering against plan? What are the biggest obstacles to success? How dynamic or stable is the company’s environment? What are the practices and expectations of the buyers? Those are only a few considerations.
Designing or adopting a sales methodology is critical. Without that methodology in place, training is a tactical attempt to fix a larger problem. The selling methodology must be developed based upon the company’s unique situation—their market, their customers, how those customers buy, the complexity and price levels of the products and services the company offers, competitive pressures, reporting requirements, the participation of partners, the skill level of their current sales people, etc.
Once Again, The Methodology Comes First
The methodology with its processes, supporting tools, measurements, and feedback mechanisms for ongoing improvement becomes the basis of most training that will take place. The overall goal of sales training is to advance compliance with and use of the sales methodology across the organization. Some training provides sales people with ancillary, generic skills, but successful companies train to their processes.
When a factor changes in a company’s environment, such as a new competitor, an economic downturn (or upturn for that matter), or the introduction of a new product, adjustments must be made to the processes and supporting tools first. Then the sales people should be trained to understand and adapt to those changes. If the methodology isn’t adjusted to meet new demands, training will encourage the sales team not to use the methodology any further. Keeping them all focused on the same approach will become difficult.
Some companies are capable of designing a new methodology or adapting to an existing one, but many are not. Resources may be focused on other tasks, do not have the skills, or cannot muster the support of key people within their organization. Designing, installing, implementing and managing a sales methodology requires help and support from every function within a corporation. Outside assistance is often required.
Potential Conflict of Interest?
We have seen highly successful cases where companies brought in training firms to help with methodology design. In other instances the results weren’t as expected as most sales training companies have a unique philosophy and therefore a specialized approach. Perhaps they are strong in the area of selling business value to executives at the expense of competitive positioning. Perhaps attention on strategies for winning very complex sales situations dilutes their efforts toward working with students on the details and tactics that they need to execute in order to win—down to the actual words they need to be saying and to whom.
A training company that specializes in one or more areas of sales expertise will not necessarily perceive or look for your requirements in other areas. If the training/consulting provider is left to define your approach, there will likely be a gap in the methodology, and of course a resultant gap in the subsequent training.
One way to handle this is to engage with two independent providers. One would assist in assessing your situation, defining your requirements, and perhaps in building your methodology. The second would provide the training and would be evaluated and selected based upon their ability to meet your specific (and complete) requirement set. That would assure that the first provider would not be defining your requirements to meet their curriculum.
The best alternative is to engage with a firm that is completely independent of any training or sales consulting provider, and that can offer the proper guidance throughout these steps to assure in the best possible result.
From Methodology Development to Training
Once you have a methodology in place, you can begin defining and formalizing your training requirements. Some of these will be methodology specific. For example, you may need a training provider who specializes in selling to the government, or one who stresses executive-level sales skills, such as required by companies selling management consulting to the Fortune 500.
Other training requirements should include program curricula, degree of interactivity, pre- and post-program assignments, ongoing support and follow-up, tools with which the sales team will do their jobs more effectively, among other critical criteria.
Needless to say, when considering both the sales consultant and the training provider, their company philosophy, viability, experience, proven successes, approach, and, of course, their people are absolutely critical success factors.
…And Measurement
Important to any company that makes an investment seeking improvement is measurement. Benchmarking current levels of performance, setting reasonable goals and objectives based upon a careful assessment of the situation, and measuring progress against those goals is a necessary, but for the large part overlooked component of most training initiatives.
When progress is at or above plan, all stakeholders are encouraged, motivated, and continue to perform and excel. If expectations are not being met, the opportunity exists for immediate problem diagnosis and adjustment, assuring that the initiative will get back on track and provide the return on investment expected.
Many VPs of sales have told ESR that they cannot get funding for retooling their sales approach—revitalizing or building a new sales methodology and providing the appropriate training—because they simply can’t say to the CEO, “For every dollar we invest in sales effectiveness this year, we’ll generate $1.55 in incremental sales.”
What Do You Do Now?
Now is the time for sales managers to demonstrate their leadership by taking an approach—the right approach—for achieving sales effectiveness within their organizations.
1. Determine that you will establish a formal sales approach suitable for your company.
2. Define your requirements and build or adopt a sales methodology, getting outside assistance if needed, before embarking on sales training.
3. Take the time and effort to evaluate, select, and manage the ongoing relationship with the sales training provider that best meets your requirements.
This article was excerpted from a three-part ESR/Insight™ brief, How Effective is Your Sales Approach.
(c) 2006 -- ES Research Group -- All Rights Reserved
The Fear and Loathing of Sales Training - To learn more about this author, visit Dave Stein's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
John BrennanJohn Brennan Ed.D. Dr. Brennan is President of Interpersonal Development, LLC, a training and development firm. Interpersonal Development has provided sales training and coaching to more than 3,000 sales reps from over 100 companies. A native of Australia, Dr. Brennan received his doctorate from the University of Rochester. His dissertation researched the effectiveness of Behavioral Modeling Technology in training people in interpersonal skills. While he has spent most of his career designing or delivering training, he was also a Vice-President of Sales of a training and development franchise with operations in 25 markets. Dr. Brennan has designed and delivered sales training in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia and the Middle East. He has been a guest speaker at numerous national and regional professional conferences. When Microsoft wanted Best Practices articles on sales for their web site, they called Dr. Brennan. The results are at http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/FX011387391033.aspx His firm’s clients have included Volvo, The Prudential, Merrill Lynch, Eastman Kodak, Gannett, Equifax Europe, the Economist Group and countless small businesses. - Visit John Brennan's Website |
|||
Linda RichardsonLinda Richardson is the Founder and Executive Chairwoman of Richardson, a global sales training and performance improvement company. As a recognized leader in the industry, she has won the coveted Stevie Award for Lifetime Achievement in Sales Excellence and she was identified by Training Industry, Inc. as one of the “Top 20 Most Influential Training Professionals.” Ms. Richardson is credited with the movement to Consultative Selling and is the author of ten books on selling and sales management, including Sales Coaching — Making the Great Leap from Sales Manager to Sales Coach, and Stop Telling, Start Selling. She teaches sales and management at the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania and the Wharton Executive Development Center. Linda is a frequent speaker at industry and client conferences, has been published extensively in industry and training journals, and has been featured in numerous publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Nation’s Business, Selling Power, Success, and The Conference Board Magazine. Learn more about Richardson's sales training and performance improvement solutions at http://www.richardson.com web - Visit Linda Richardson's Website |
|||
David AchesonDavid Acheson is the founder of DCJA Consultancy. DCJA Consultancy is a management consultancy business specialising in B2B sales consultancy. They offer bespoke and packaged sales consultancy including Sales Optimisation Review, Interim Sales Management, Sales & Marketing Review, 1:1 Sales & Management Staff Analysis, Management Training, Solution Sales Training, Creation of New Pay Plan, KPI's, run Customer Feedback Campaigns, assist with Recruitment, Coaching, Appraisals and set up Strategic Marketing Campaigns. David spent his early career in accountancy and then moved into sales in 1982, working in Office Equipment, IT, Advertising, Training, Outsourcing and Consultancy. He has held many Senior Positions in SMBs and Global Organisations including Head of Sales Operations & Head of Business Development. His knowledge, skills and great experience of the Sales Industry has led to David making keynote speeches and running educational sessions to key businesses through organisations including The Chamber of Commerce and Business Link. - Visit David Acheson's Website |
|||
Leanne Hoagland-SmithAre your sales where you want them to be? Will you be one of the few who achieves sales or business success or one of the many who have failed to change? Are you tired of being told you are like everyone else? Then you may find my first book on sales of interest. Be the Red Jacket in the Sea of Gray Suits, The Keys to Unlocking Sales available at Amazon or at http://www.processspecialist.com/red-jacket.htm. This book is a reflection of my no-nonsense approach to improving sales to overall business results. If you are truly committed to making sustainable changes, then I can help you secure a positive return on your investment because I focus on executable solutions not telling you the problems you already know you have. From training to corporate (group) coaching to executive one on one coaching, my approach is to assess, create awareness, build a goal driven action plan and then execute. The bottom line question is "Not do you or your employees know it, but do you or they want to do it?" Please call for a free strategy session at 219.759.5601. - Visit Leanne Hoagland-Smith's Website |
|||
Dave KurlanDave Kurlan is the founder and CEO of Objective Management Group, Inc., the industry leader in sales assessments and sales force evaluations, and the CEO of David Kurlan & Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in sales force development. Dave has been a top rated speaker at Inc. Magazine's Conference on Growing the Company, the Sales & Marketing Management Conference and the Gazelles Sales & Marketing Summit. He has been featured on radio and TV, including World Business Review with General Norman Schwarzkopf, in Inc. Magazine, Selling Power Magazine, Sales & Marketing Management Magazine and Incentive Magazine. He is the author of Mindless Selling and Baseline Selling – How to Become a Sales Superstar by Using What You Already Know about the Game of Baseball. He created and wrote STAR, a proprietary recruiting process for hiring great salespeople, and he writes Understanding the Sales Force, a popular business Blog and is a contributing author to The Death of 20th Century Selling and 101 Great Ways to Improve Your Life, Volume 2. - Visit Dave Kurlan's Website |
|||
John AlexanderJohn has taught keyword research and SEO skills to small groups of business owners and Webmasters from over 80 different countries world wide since 2002. John is also the Director of Search Engine Academy ; Co-director of Training at Search Engine Workshops offering live, SEO Workshops with his partner SEO educator Robin Nobles, author of the very first comprehensive online search engine marketing courses at SEO Training Online and the SEO Workshop Resource Center. I look forward to hearing from you! - Visit John Alexander's Website |
|||
George LudwigGeorge Ludwig is a recognized authority on sales strategy and peak performance psychology. An international speaker, trainer, and corporate consultant, he helps clients like Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Laboratories, Northwestern Mutual, CIGNA, and numerous others improve sales force effectiveness and performance. Though it's George's strategies and processes that help corporations increase productivity and performance, it's his tremendous energy and dynamism that spark the transformation. Again and again, clients remark on his amazing ability to unleash human capacity and inspire men and women to break out of their comfort zones. The result is a whole new type of salesperson. His customized presentations teach achievers to make stunning advances in their lives. From helping salespeople realize cherished dreams to helping corporations exponentially accelerate revenue streams, George Ludwig leaves audiences and individuals empowered, emboldened, and clamoring for more. George is the best-selling author of Power Selling: Seven Strategies for Cracking the Sales Code and Wise Moves: 60 Quick Tips to Improve Your Position in Life & Business. - Visit George Ludwig's Website |
|||
Staging DivaDebra Gould, aka The Staging Diva®, is President of Six Elements Inc., an internationally recognized home staging company. Inspired by many requests from aspiring home stagers wanting to start similar businesses, Gould created the Staging Diva Home Staging Business Training Program. Gould has trained over 1000 Staging Diva Graduates worldwide to start staging businesses. Buying decorating and selling six of her own homes in four years lead to an interest in real estate staging which she turned into a career with the launch of sixelements.com in 2002. Since then she has staged hundreds of homes in addition to teaching home staging training. Gould is the author of several home staging resources including a series of popular ebooks made up of a Design Guide, Color Guide and Portfolio Guide. For more information about Debra Gould visit stagingdiva.com. - Visit Staging Diva's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Dave's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
|
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Performance Improvement Plan Instant Scripts Effective Art Of Networking Referral Networking Solution Women Entrepreneurs |
|
 | ||
 |
The Top 10 ProBlogger Posts
Best Posts for Bloggers | |
 |
Top 50 Marketing Blogs
Top Marketing Blogs of 2009 | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||