|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Accountability and Outcome is a Shared Responsibility in the RFP Process
|
| Guest post by: Jon Hansen |
Article Overview: It never fails to amaze me that given the amount of research which goes into the production of each PI Window on Business Show, there are always a number of new insights that come to light during the live broadcast. In fact this is one of the reasons why social media is so critical to the procurement profession, as it broadens the lens through which we can view a particular subject.
![]() |
Free Download - Is supplier incumbency a major problem with government contracting? By Jon Hansen |
Accountability and Outcome is a Shared Responsibility in the RFP Process
It never fails to amaze me thatgiven the amount of researchwhich
goes into the production of each PI Window on Business Show, thereare
always a number of new insights that come to light during the live
broadcast. In fact this is one of the reasons why social media is so
critical to the procurement profession, as it broadens the lens through
which we can view a particular subject. In short, if we as
professionals confine ourselves to a single venue of collaboration,
thereby limiting what I refer to as the cross-pollinization process, we
ultimately and quite unintentionally risk the ongoing veracity of the
insights we wish to gain and share.
One such example of these important on-air insights came during my interview with SRS founder and visionary Andy Akrouche.
During the segment, which was centered on how the RFP process is
being re-defined by the emergence of intuitive technology platforms
such as SRS' newly launched RFPBlaster solution, I made the observation
that while important, technology in and of itself is not the answer to
the problems posed by eroding supply bases and decreasing supplier
response to RFPs.
As Andy succinctly put it, the relationship between buyer and
supplier is onethat has to be based ontrust, otherwise suppliers will
not even come to the table. A fact that was driven home by a senior VP
from Colgate-Palmolive who had attended one of my seminars a few years
ago. Referencing Colgate's efforts to institute an Ariba reverse
auction application, the VP stated that after a considerable
expenditure of resources, when the time came to run the first event
they did notreceive a single bid.
The problem as is the case with most RFPs is the prevailing believe
that the system by its very nature is tilted to a certain degree toward
a known and proven vendor thus reducing the exercise to one of price
verification rather than competitive supplier selection. Against this
backdrop, phrases such as transparency and a fair and open bid process
fall largely on deaf ears. Hence the reason for my position that
technology is not the driving force or initiator of the RFP process,
but is instead a facilitator that streamlines, manages and monitors
bidding activity. This means that the precursor to success is the
level of trust that Akrouche had referred to during our interview.
Trust however is a two-way street, and technology such as RFPBlaster
serves as the proverbial olive branch between a buying organization and
its suppliers. How does the RFPBlaster fulfill the role of peacemaker
with what for many organizations is a highly cynical supply base. To
fully answer this question, one must first understand the reasons
behind the growing chasm that has and continues to occur between
transactional partners.
To begin, and as referenced many times in this blog, studies and
reports indicate that buyers tend to limit their focus on known
supplier relationships simply because of time constraints and limited
resources. For many purchasing professionals whose mandate can quickly
vacillate between the need to fill an immediate service demand and the
necessity of obtaining the best value (re price), simplifying through
compression of options is the only viable option.
This of course creates a limited range of engagement as only those
suppliers with whom the buyer feels most comfortable are likely to be
seriously considered. A practice by the way that is further fuelled by
misaligned vendor raltionalization strategies that create artificial
pricing metrics that further removes the buying organization from
market realities. No wonder a Best Buy can pay up to a 23% premium, or
the Department of National Defence in Canada pay a 157% delta above
market pricefor Indirect IT service parts.
Collectively, the above scenariocreates the perfect conditions for
undetected margin creep, andgradually declining service levels.
Italsocreates unfavourable conditions for the successful introduction
of an RFP application, explaining why the Colgate-Palmolive Ariba
"initiative" failed.This scenarioalso sheds light, at least in part,
on why 85% of all public and private sector e-Procurement initiatives
fail to achieve the expected results. In short, what we are talking
about is not a technological problem alone, but an expertise or
practical experience issue that is a reflection of the minimal degree
of involvement purchasing professionals have actually had in their
organization's efforts to automate the supply chain practice.
Where a solution such as the RFPBlaster changes the game, in essence
filling the knowledge vacuum that has come about as a result of
initiatives being viewed as primarily an IT or Finance department
undertaking, is found in its practical purchasing expertise origins.
As Akrouche emphasized during our interview, he and the SRS team
incorporated their vast purchasing and supplier
relationsexpertiseinto thedevelopment process at the beginning.
They then structured the RFPBlaster's functionality around these
realities of experience, providing a practical "relational" engagement
vehicle in which the real challenges of buyers and suppliers are
addressed.
Unlike an Oracle or an SAP, which if you think about it are software
companies first, and therefore view a problem through a technological
lens, SRS developed its RFPBlaster through practical understanding
using technology as the delivery platform. There is a world of
difference.
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Smart & Simple Internet Techniques
Multilevel Marketing: 4 Tips To MLM Success
Do You Pretend To Listen To People?
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



