|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Alcock Borrows a Page from Gershon?
Written by: Jon HansenArticle Overview: “In what has been described as the most significant restructuring of public services for a generation, the rest of the $21 billion (in savings) will have to come from overall efficiency gains such as improving the procurement system, and streamlining areas such as information technology and human resources. That’s why the skeptics are skeptical.”
![]() |
Free Download - Is supplier incumbency a major problem with government contracting? By Jon Hansen |
Alcock Borrows a Page from Gershon?
“In what has
been described as the most significant restructuring of public services for a
generation, the rest of the $21 billion (in savings) will have to come from
overall efficiency gains such as improving the procurement system, and
streamlining areas such as information technology and human resources. That’s why the skeptics are skeptical.”
In case some of you are wondering if I am just
repeating what I had written in Saturday’s post in terms of Reg Alcock’s statement
“that the “federal government is on the verge of
launching the biggest transformation in the way government is managed in its
history,” the above comment was made by Sir Peter Gershon in a July 22, 2004
interview with the BBC.
In the 2004
interview, it was announced that the “government’s plans to cut bureaucracy” and
in the process “save” £21 billion over a four year period were based on “Gershon’s
Review.” The Review, which was referred
to as “a modern bureaucrats Doomsday Book,” emphasized that the savings would be
achieved by way of a recommendation to cut at
least 80,000 civil service jobs and the introduction of greater process
efficiency – think shared services.
From the 10,000
foot level the conceptual view is really quite simple; 1) weaken the
negotiating/bargaining strength of the PS union, 2) introduce a replacement for
Lynch who is more amiably tied to what May referred to as the “federal
politicians and the bureaucrats that serve them,” and 3) reach an important
“accord” in which the biggest obstacles (re ITAC, CATA etc.) to implementing a
Shared Services (nee Outsourcing) program have been compromised, if not
removed.
Collective Bargaining: A Human Right Deserving
Legal Protection?
Step One – Weaken the negotiating/bargaining
strength of the union that represents the public sector workforce
In a June 2007 review of whether collective
bargaining was an essential right of workers, The Supreme Court of Canada made
the following observations:
- The right to bargain collectively with an employer enhances the human dignity, liberty and autonomy of workers by giving them the opportunity to influence the establishment of workplace rules and thereby gain some control over a major aspect of their lives, namely their work.
- Collective bargaining is not simply an instrument for pursuing external ends . . . rather (it) is intrinsically valuable as an experience in self-government.
- Collective bargaining permits workers to achieve a form of workplace democracy and to ensure the rule of law in the workplace. Workers gain a voice to influence the establishment of rules that control a major aspect of their lives.
While this is not the venue to conduct a detailed analysis of the suit, the fact that these recent events including the “pay equity changes” as they are called were slipped through as part of a stimulus package to boost a sagging economy is telling.
An Amiable Accomplice?
Step Two – Replace an adversary with a friend of federal politicians and bureaucrats
In her May 7, 2009 Ottawa Citizen article May reported that while Lynch “presided over one of the rockiest relationships ever between federal politicians and the bureaucrats that serve them,” Wayne Wouters is “known as one of the public services all-around nice guys.”
While some may conclude that an all around nice guy is the perfect candidate to bridge the gaps of contention between the government and the various stakeholders with whom it is currently at odds - including public sector workers, I could not help but recall the comments made by Ray Liotta’s character, Henry Hill in the movie Goodfellas. For those of you who may be unfamiliar with the film, the dialogue in question takes place in a coffee shop where Hill is meeting with his long-time friend and accomplice Jimmy Conway (played by the incomparable Robert De Niro). The setting is a coffee shop shortly after Hill’s arrest, where both he and Conway are supposed to go over legal defence strategies. However, Hill realizes that since being busted, he now poses a threat to Conway and the rest of the family hierarchy. The following dialogue ensues:
“If you’re part of a crew nobody tells you they’re going to kill you. It doesn’t work that way.
There aren’t any arguments or curses like in the movies.
Your murderers come with smiles. They come as your friends.
People who cared for you all your life.”
A friend - a long-time associate - and an all around nice guy?! By the way, the movie Goodfellas is based on a true story.
Removing the Final Stumbling Block?
Step Three – Removing the biggest obstacles
Before you can “reduce” any workforce, you need to make certain that the resources and infrastructure are in place to ensure a relatively seamless transfer of support capabilities to minimize the negative impact of transitioning to a new delivery model. The government believes that the Shared Services approach will provide the needed infrastructure.
An essential step towards removing an important hurdle to implementing a Shared Services strategy was to find a way to address the somewhat vociferous protests of key private sector industry players or suppliers.
The Thursday press release by Minister Paradis, in which heavyweight associations such as ITAC state that everyone “should be supporting organizations like Public Works and Government Services Canada in achieving their shared services objectives, sooner rather than later,” is an important concession that can pave the way for a faster adoption and subsequent implementation of a Shared Services strategy.
Ironically, by supporting the Shared Services approach the ITACs and CATAs are indirectly (and likely unknowingly) supporting massive layoffs in the Canadian public sector (see Gershon). This of course is the inherent problem with having a myopic view of a much broader issue.
Conclusions?
Referencing my favorite Citizen reporter once again and in particular her September 3rd, 2005 article in which then Treasury Board President Reg Alcock announced that the “federal government is on the verge of launching the biggest transformation in the way government is managed in its history,” is interesting in light of present day events.
What is worth noting is Alcock’s stated position that the business of government should be viewed as a “single giant enterprise, rather than 120 departments and agencies operating like independent fiefdoms.” And while consolidations of this magnitude always involves job loss, which Alcock acknowledged would happen, the government’s position that said losses will be “easily managed without layoffs because of the massive wave of baby boomers who will be retiring over the next five to seven years,” is suspect. This is due in large part to the fact that there hasn’t been any disclosure as to how the government arrived at the conclusion that attrition and retirement alone will maintain a zero job-loss ratio or balance.
In the end, and as long as the Government continues to operate in a cloud of obfuscation where disclosures are sporadic and somewhat disjointed, we can only refer to past examples of similar undertakings. And in this regard, the Gershon Efficiency Review should be required reading.
For now, and to sum it up best . . . Shared Services equals job loss! Related Articles
Article Tags: bidi, compatibility, div, endif, family auto, gte, itc officina sans book, layout grid, mso, object classid, orphan, pa4, pitch, signature, style definitions, style name, times new roman, xml, zoom
|
About the Author: Jon Hansen RSS for Jon's articles - Visit Jon's website Personal Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jwhansen Click here to visit Jon's website Member Question Regarding Ariba Experience Is Six Sigma Still Relevant in a Dynamically Changing World Who will be the supply chain poster child in 5 to 10 years How does policy either motivate or undermine employee performance Did an AntiNorth American Sentiment and Arrogance Undermine Anderssons Tenure at GM |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
10 Steps to a Great Support Team
Are You Too Good for Your Job?
What Type of Business Should I Start?
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



