Tweet

Are Multiple Supply Chain Networks Important? (A PI Q and A) Track No. 2

Written by: Jon Hansen

Article Overview: The following is the second track from the still growing number of responses I have received from readers around the world regarding the question, “Are Multiple Supply Chain Networks Important?

Are Multiple Supply Chain Networks Important? (A PI Q and A) Track No. 2

The following is the second track from the still growing number of responses I have received from readers around the world regarding the question, “Are Multiple Supply Chain Networks Important?

PI Question:

A 2006 Report made the following statement:

“Designing and operating multiple supply networks to meet the needs of specific market segments–supply chain innovation and the use of multiple supply chains will be important to future revenue and market share growth.

“Based on your own experience is this an accurate assessment? If yes, why? If no, why?

Network Member Profile:

Senior Supply Chain Manager (Distribution and Warehousing) U.S.A.

Reader Response:

My issue was that no definition of multiple supply chain networks was given. After reading the article, it’s still not given, but we can deduce from the discussion in the article what the authors are talking about. You can see in the answers that you have that everyone is looking at it from what I would call a “my supply chain” point of view. There are diverse industries and networks involved - and everyone thinks theirs is the best. However, they are all looking backward and not from beginning to the end.

I think the authors were talking about a firm’s ability to meet a particular segment’s demand so they could grow the business. I worked for a furniture manufacturer that sold product in specialty store, through retailers and to big box retailers. Each segment had a different supply chain. They all start at the factory - the big box goes direct to DC from the factory. The specialty stores may go direct store from the factory or may go to a domestic DC and then to the store. There are there different supply networks for one manufacturer.

In order to grow revenue, the firm had to segregate products by channel - Lowe’s didn’t like us selling the same items to them that we sold to another customer. Then the firm had to deliver the products properly to the channel - some were faxed orders, some EDI, some L/C payment and some prepay credit cards. Each channel had the same basic requirements but we had to specialize by customer in the channel. So the equation gets even more and more complicated.

The firm could get smaller retailers to work within the required framework with minor exceptions. However, with larger customers, the network and its requirements are more complex.

The only way to manage this type of “multiple network” is to ensure that technology is driving the channel and supporting processes. One other point is that the entire chain - from planner to sales - needs to understand how each channel works in order to ensure that customer needs are met and expectations managed.

PI Follow-up Question:

Thank you for providing your perspective on what is certainly an interesting topic.

Now there are two distinct tracks in terms of the subsequent questions I would ask you based upon your comments.

Pertaining to your reference to the furniture manufacturer’s use of multiple supply chain networks, and in particular the comment regarding Loews, a 2001 MIT report which reviewed Coordinated Supply Networks made the following observation regarding multiple supply chains:

“Participants belonging to multiple supply chains complicate the formation of disjoint supply networks. A shared supplier competing as part of two separate supply networks creates potential conflict of interest among the participants.”

Would your reference to “complexity” be linked to an incremental increase in the potential for channel conflicts? Being the manufacturer and therefore the point of origin, how do you view the MIT paper’s assertion that a shared supplier relationship increases this potential? For example, to what degree did Loews interests and influence shape your other customer relationships?

The second track focuses on your statement that it is imperative to ensure that “technology is driving the channel and supporting processes.”

Accepting this principle on its face value, what are your views relative to the role that Service Oriented Architectures or Web 2.0 can and will play in the successful management of multiple supply chains?

Related Articles
  Are Multiple Supply Chains Important Survey Response 2
  Are Multiple Supply Chains Important (Survey Response 4)
  Are Multiple Supply Chains Important Survey Response 3
  Are Multiple Supply Chain Networks Important A PI Q and A Track No 3
  What is the Value in your Supply Chain A PI Q and A

Article Tags: accurate assessment, box retailers, furniture manufacturer, lowe s, market segments, market share growth, network member, payme, pi, point of view, reader response, segment, specialty store, specialty stores, supply chain innovation, supply chain manager, supply chain networks, supply chains, supply networks



Related Forum Posts
Re: SES Toronto Next Week - In that case, how about the following? Track: Get Me Up to Speed * State of Search Marketing in Canada Track: Practical & Actionable * Beyond Linkbait: Getting Authoritative Online Mentions Track: Advanced * User Search Behavior * Social Media Success * Web 2.0 & Search Engines * Giving Credit Where It’s Due: Which Campaign Sold What?
Women Entrepreneur Tips - Thank you LeoOliveros, I found #4 particularly true in my case: 4. The Enterprise Must Include the Power of Power Networks. As a conductor of your own enterprise, you can not see yourself as a one-woman-show. You must choose to utilize the power people in your life, by asking for help when you need it, and effectively delegating in order to capitalize on your strengths and that of your power network. When certain experts are not represented in your power network, you must actively seek advisors or mentors and develop a team of specialists, so the benefits are received by everyone involved in the power network - the true Power of Power Networks.
Re: What works for you? - Hi Yinka, I work better under pressure of deadlines when I am doing something for other people. However, I like to have the leisure to develop my own projects. The first case is what Stephen Covey calls a "Quadrant 1" activity ("Important and urgent") whereas the second case is a "Quadrant 2" activity ("Important, not urgent"). We should aim to make as much time as possible for Q2 activities so that we can develop our own projects. Easier said than done!
Seek Venture Capital & Funding - Hello, Greetings from India. I am Seeking Venture Capital for Offshore Software Company Start-up. Need advise along with Business Model Sample. I have a basic outline for an offshore company. 1. Technology - like Microsoft Dot Net, Java, LAMP 2. Talent Team - Found Good Technology Developers. 3. Where I can get the leads/potential customers - Leads have been identified who are willing to move forward offshore projects. 4. I do not have resources like funding. It is a very critical factor to me Industries: Manufacturing, Real Estate, Retail, Insurance, Distribution & Logistics, Healthcare, Industry Associations and Software Product Development, Agricultural Industries and Etc. Services: Offshore Software Development Company. Offices to be located: Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India and USA. Products/Services/Applications in areas like POS & Billing, Sales & Distribution, Production Planning, Material Management, Inventory Control, Plant Maintenance, Purchasing, Accounting and Logistics. Dynamic Web Programming with Database Driven Content Management Systems, Online Stores for E-Commerce, B2B Solutions, Community Portals, Website Redesign and Development, Custom ERP with Enterprise Wide Functional Modules such as Marketing, CRM, Accounting, Inventory Control, Sales & Distribution, Production Planning, Purchase & Stores, Logistics and Supply Chain. Seek your further questions and help. Thank you, Best Regards, Jayapratap.
Re: Bad SEO techniques? - [quote="jacksonp":1y3g8bot]that is quite true.We all should avoid these kind of techniques.I am here sharing few more points which we should take in mind..As an experienced person of SEO I want to share here some facts which should be avoided by us.I hope that these will help some of the newcomers a lot.. Choosing a title that has no relation to the content on the page Using extremely lengthy titles that are unhelpful to users Using a single title tag across all of your site’s pages or a large group of pages Stuffing unneeded keywords in your title tags Writing description meta tag that has no relation to the content on the page Multiple domains Multiple identical sites Cross Linking[/quote:1y3g8bot] re: Cross Linking, how do you define that? I thought linking to other pages on your website (that are related) was a good thing...maybe that's not what you meant.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Stress: What Causes It and How To Deal With It

Severance and Separation Agreements

Anger Solutions at Work: Why Customers Get Angry

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.