Are Multiple Supply Chains Important (Survey Response 6)
Are Multiple Supply Chains Important (Survey Response 6)
I think the moot question out here is whether Subjective Questions can have Objective Answers?
Let us consider some Seeds for thought:
1. Customer Demand for a Single Product is Highly Variable
Naturally the Supply Chain has to be supple enough to adjust to this Variability. However the Variability cannot be fully tackled by a single supply chain, hence the temptation to look at additional supply chains in times of Peaks and Troughs.
Real Life Analogies
E.g. 1 - While companies have Staff on Rolls for identified work flow they have started resorting to Temps for tackling manpower variability in times of Work Flow Variabilities.
E.g. 2 - Companies use more that 1 Internet Service Provider to tackle the bandwidth variabilities
2. Customer Demand is increasingly migrating to Need Solutions which involve a combination of Products and Services. Obviously the complexity of Supply Chain is larger now.
A single supply chain to cater to continuosly changing demand chain seems like an Objective Answer to a Subjective Question!
3. Optimization of Future Supply Chains
It is about Managing Demand Variability for Solutions by designing A Supply Chain which harmonises the multiple supply chains for each product or service.
In simple terms Each Solution is a combination of many Products and Services. Each such product or service can have few / multiple supply chains. So in effect one has to visualise multiple supply chains hooked onto a Central Supply chain which is unique to each Solution.
I guess that is the essence of the Report !!
My Response:
Thank you for your thoughtful response Sid. I appreciate the added perspective.
What is interesting is that this "assessment" appeared in a report that was written by the Institute of Supply Management (ISM), CAPS and AT Kearney last year. Much like the other commenters, I shared similar reservations that were outlined in part 3 of of my 7 part series Dangerous Supply Chain Myths. The report's title by the way was Succeeding in a Dynamic World: Supply Management in the Decade Ahead.
My reasoning however was tied to the fact that while the concept of Multiple Supply Chains has some merit, with 85% of all initiatives failing to achieve the expected results to date, most organizations have not been able to progress past the walk (re success within existing environments) before you can run stage. In essence, what is conceptually viable is not necessarily practical in real-world circumstances. At least not to the point where you can offer an absolute such as the one presented in the report.
The fact remains that these variables to which you had referred are a reflection of an agent-based model in which real-time adaptation to real-world circumstances is the key element. Unfortunately, the majority of traditional thinking and therefore applications and adjunct concepts are structured around the "absolutes" of an equation-based model.
As long as industry pundits (which includes vendors) continue to focus on improving the sequential framework of the current equation-based supply "chain" model versus developing the agent-based Metaprise platform that drives true real-world, real-time synchronization between disparate stakeholders, it is unlikely that the subjective elements will be adequately addressed.
Please feel free to provide additional comments on the above, because afterall it is the passionate exchange of ideas that drives true innovation and progress.
Are Multiple Supply Chains Important Survey Response 6 - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Sid, Process Consultant and Analyst, Bombay, India
I think the moot question out here is whether Subjective Questions can have Objective Answers?
Let us consider some Seeds for thought:
1. Customer Demand for a Single Product is Highly Variable
Naturally the Supply Chain has to be supple enough to adjust to this Variability. However the Variability cannot be fully tackled by a single supply chain, hence the temptation to look at additional supply chains in times of Peaks and Troughs.
Real Life Analogies
E.g. 1 - While companies have Staff on Rolls for identified work flow they have started resorting to Temps for tackling manpower variability in times of Work Flow Variabilities.
E.g. 2 - Companies use more that 1 Internet Service Provider to tackle the bandwidth variabilities
2. Customer Demand is increasingly migrating to Need Solutions which involve a combination of Products and Services. Obviously the complexity of Supply Chain is larger now.
A single supply chain to cater to continuosly changing demand chain seems like an Objective Answer to a Subjective Question!
3. Optimization of Future Supply Chains
It is about Managing Demand Variability for Solutions by designing A Supply Chain which harmonises the multiple supply chains for each product or service.
In simple terms Each Solution is a combination of many Products and Services. Each such product or service can have few / multiple supply chains. So in effect one has to visualise multiple supply chains hooked onto a Central Supply chain which is unique to each Solution.
I guess that is the essence of the Report !!
My Response:
Thank you for your thoughtful response Sid. I appreciate the added perspective.
What is interesting is that this "assessment" appeared in a report that was written by the Institute of Supply Management (ISM), CAPS and AT Kearney last year. Much like the other commenters, I shared similar reservations that were outlined in part 3 of of my 7 part series Dangerous Supply Chain Myths. The report's title by the way was Succeeding in a Dynamic World: Supply Management in the Decade Ahead.
My reasoning however was tied to the fact that while the concept of Multiple Supply Chains has some merit, with 85% of all initiatives failing to achieve the expected results to date, most organizations have not been able to progress past the walk (re success within existing environments) before you can run stage. In essence, what is conceptually viable is not necessarily practical in real-world circumstances. At least not to the point where you can offer an absolute such as the one presented in the report.
The fact remains that these variables to which you had referred are a reflection of an agent-based model in which real-time adaptation to real-world circumstances is the key element. Unfortunately, the majority of traditional thinking and therefore applications and adjunct concepts are structured around the "absolutes" of an equation-based model.
As long as industry pundits (which includes vendors) continue to focus on improving the sequential framework of the current equation-based supply "chain" model versus developing the agent-based Metaprise platform that drives true real-world, real-time synchronization between disparate stakeholders, it is unlikely that the subjective elements will be adequately addressed.
Please feel free to provide additional comments on the above, because afterall it is the passionate exchange of ideas that drives true innovation and progress.
Are Multiple Supply Chains Important Survey Response 6 - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Stephanie RobeyStephanie Robey is President and CoFounder of Pivot Positive, LLC - an Internet marketing business focused on helping people start work at home ventures. Previously, she was employed at The Search Agency with over 20 years experience in graphic design and 10 years experience in online marketing. She was responsible for launching the Conversion Path Optimization (CPO) unit where she and her team have conducted hundreds of optimization tests for online companies across multiple verticals. She is a successful entrepreneur having started and sold 2 companies and remains on the board of directors of the third, PhotoSpin.com Stephanie began her career in the direct marketing realm creating and producing direct mail for many of the major cable television companies and directly attributes her understanding of Internet marketing to those early offline experiences. Stephanie is a graduate of San Diego State University with a BFA in Graphic Arts and also holds an Executive MBA from the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University. Read Steph's Blog Meet Steph and Dave Sign up for our Free 7-Day BootCamp: Self Employed & Rich - Visit Stephanie Robey's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jon's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
|
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Webinar Plan Leadership Style Assessment 9 Questions From New Marketers Intentional Leadership Integrity 10 Areas of Differentiation |
|
 | ||
 |
The Top 10 GTD Times Posts
Best Posts for Productivity | |
 |
Write The PR
Press Release Builder | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
