Tweet

Finding the hidden Intellectual Property (IP) value in procurement contracts (Future Path Profile)

Written by: Jon Hansen

Article Overview: Looking beyond what Future Path President and CEO Greg Waite referred to as the “casual conversation” surrounding the issue of Intellectual Property (IP) rights within the majority of procurement contracts, I thought of my own work as a consultant. I am often retained by both public and private sector organizations to prepare studies or reports on a variety of topics ranging from the viability of digital signatures within the contract routing process to assessing the changing technological landscape and its impact on current as well as contemplated e-procurement strategies.

Finding the hidden Intellectual Property (IP) value in procurement contracts (Future Path Profile)

Looking beyond what Future Path President and CEO Greg Waite referred to as the “casual conversation” surrounding the issue of Intellectual Property (IP) rights within the majority of procurement contracts, I thought of my own work as a consultant.

I am often retained by both public and private sector organizations to prepare studies or reports on a variety of topics ranging from the viability of digital signatures within the contract routing process to assessing the changing technological landscape and its impact on current as well as contemplated e-procurement strategies.

Employing a patented research methodology, I have been told that my papers provide a unique insight and perspective that in many cases have resulted in a competitive advantage for the client. In this context, the question of ownership relative to the findings and corresponding conclusions has rarely if ever been broached.

As the author of the paper, and combined with a significantly lower consulting fee as a result of the time savings associated with the methodology (which is centered on Web 4.0), I am of course not inclined to surrender these rights – at least not at the present price point.

But the real issue is that I have never even been approached about the IP value of the work. And this is precisely the point that Greg Waite was making when he used the term “casual conversation.”

Knowledge is Power

When Sir Francis Bacon coined the phrase “knowledge is power,” I am certain that he hadn’t contemplated it’s meaning in terms of IP value.

Nonetheless, it is indeed an accurate reflection of what has become an overlooked enterprise “asset.” This is due in large part to the fact that as an adjunct of finance, purchasing imperatives have traditionally been centered around lowest or “best value” pricing, thereby reducing the negotiation for IP value to one of indifference in which its unrecognized value is bantied around as a “lost leader.”

This while you were sleeping mindset is best illustrated in the following Future Path case example.

A firm is looking for an ERP system. The RFP goes out with the typical feature list, training, consulting, customization etc. The ERP system is forecast to cost $50M. A proprietary piece, covering consignment sales and inventory to the company’s 500 retail unit partners is in the RFP. Also the development of an e-learning system will also be jointly put together. The typical contract would certainly have all the proper IP rights in there. But there is no doubt that the ERP vendor will take some or all of the IP arising from the e-learning system and the consignment inventory system to future customers. With an IP perspective the procurement team would work to identify all unique value add coming from the requirements and would identify the consignment inventory system and e-learning system to be proprietary and a source of innovative advantage over the competition. At the very least, it is a major source of negotiation. It might actually be more beneficial to let the vendor create a commercial and therefore portable consignment and e-learning system with royalty sharing. Or the vendor may wish to be unencumbered and therefore have to reduce his (or her) cost to have 100% IP ownership and business flexibility.

The above example certainly raises the question, how much value from both a monetary and competitive advantage standpoint has your organization “unknowingly” surrendered over the years? Like high blood pressure, it could be the silent killer – at least for your balance sheet.

More than plug and play legalese

What is interesting is that most organizations have likely spent considerable dollars implementing an application in which a buffet of plug and play legal terminology is made available to the purchasing department for incorporation into a contract.

While these solutions may satisfy the technical elements of the law, to what degree (if at all) do they take into account the IP value associated with the transaction?

While the vast majority of contracts seek to protect the interests of individual stakeholders – some have reffered to it as the “belt with suspenders” clauses, in most cases it is unlikely that a value has actually been assigned to the contract’s IP component. Enter Future Path’s Nucleus intellectual asset/intellectual property management system.

Why Nucleus?

As is always the case, these profile articles are designed to inform and where necessary facilitate an introduction between the Procurement Insights readership and its sponsors. Therefore, the viability of any sponsor solution for your organization will be up to you, and you alone to determine.

That said the purpose of this post is to provide you with a point of contextual reference. And as I tell my seminar audiences, my sole purpose is to stimulate you to think outside of the framework of that with which you are most familiar and most comfortable. In essence, help you to see through a new or different lens of greater understanding.

This of course leads to the question, why Future Path (and in particular their Nucleus product)?

Beside the previously referenced case study, a second example of the perils of expeditiously surrendering IP value in favor of “up-front” savings sounded an alarm that is worthy of consideration. Specifically, it demonstrated that the development of a vendor’s asset is often financed 100% by the client. This may mean that your company might actually be paying the lion’s share of the development costs to ultimately provide your competition with a solution that will give them a competitive edge. A kind of self-inflicted wound. Here are the specifics:

A company is looking at a web-based content management system. It has operations in the US and France. The vendor of choice does not have a language localization dictionary in French, though it has many other languages. The client and or the procurement group request a quote for the French translation services, knowing that this is best left in the hands of the software company. The software company quotes $25,000. The total price is competitive with other vendors and this is the vendor of choice for a variety of reasons. So the delivery of the French dictionary is built to the contract. Though a small opportunity, the procurement department had the chance to look at the translation as intellectual property, in this case Copyright. The client was paying full value including a profit. The procurement department could have, and should have asked for a royalty of 20% to 50% for each sale of the dictionary to the software company’s clients. This would open up an entire dialogue from which meaningful insights would surface such as, a) confirmation of the software company’s pricing model for subsequent customers, b) the level of interest on the part of the software company in terms of future market development, and c) the software company’s intentions relative to making the product available to competitors to name just a few. The change in perspective is powerful, because the procurement group starts to treat the dictionary as an intellectual asset or property from which the vendor derives an ongoing value.

While Future Path can undoubtedly provide a variety of similar case references, the real question is simply this . . . what is the current IP value that is presently available to your organization, and what is the cost of not knowing this answer?

Related Articles
  Intellectual Property Protection Minimum Standards
  The importance of Intellectual Property when buying or selling a business
  Federal Requirements
  How to structure your business to protect your intellectual property
  Protecting Your Ideas

Article Tags: accurate reflection, adjunct, casual conversation, digital signatures, e procurement, enterprise asset, francis bacon, future path, greg waite, imperatives, indifference, knowledge is power, path president, private sector organizations, procurement contracts, procurement strategies, research methodology, sir francis bacon, technological landscape, time savings



Related Forum Posts
how much for a franchise fee? - Dear Colleague There is no easy answer to this question. Things to consider: [list=] The sizeof the Franchise Clent base Expected Turnover Intellectual Property costs (recoup) Number of Franchises Number of employees Original Set up costs Franchise admin costs An example: A franchise that I was involved in setting was to a simple "lawn mowing/home repair" franchise. The Franchise included national/local advertising - preparation of client lists - general admin - central accounting etc The Franchise involved 300-500 clients - and an annual turnover of about $300,000 . The annual franchise fee was $30,000. Hope that this gives you some idea Take care Ian[/list]
Is this copyright infringement? - Hi TheAnonymousMan, From the resources you've provided, it looks like I'll just have to take my own set of pictures at live tennis events for my site. But The Canadian Intellectual Property Office's [i:1smac7qr]A Guide To Copyrights[/i:1smac7qr] states that "The Copyright Act provides that any 'fair dealing' with a work for purposes of private study or research, or for criticism, review or news reporting is not infringement. However, in the case of criticism, review, or news reporting, the user is required to give the source and the author's, performer's, sound recording maker's or broadcaster's name, if known" (6). So if I wanted to report news on Maria Sharapova or make a comment about her, would using an image from her official website be ok if I simply attached a link back to her site (i.e. I gave credit to wherever I got the image)?
assessing hidden franchise costs - That's a good question Kevin. I've heard some disgruntled comments elsewhere concerning additional fees and hidden costs inherent in [i:3fajtcj7]some[/i:3fajtcj7] franchise opps. It may take awhile to come to some conclusions on those stats. I[i:3fajtcj7] can [/i:3fajtcj7]tell you that there is always that risk and it would be a good bet to add a percentage for those hidden costs.
Re: Template of Service Agreement/Contractor Agreement - Shimmy- I, too, would be happy to share my template contract for a service provider. But beware, a template agreement may not be sufficient to properly address your needs. Some key differences between Employees and Service Providers: 1. Tax Status. Employers are responsible for withholding tax on employee's earnings. Independent Contractors are responsible for reporting their income/taxes. There is a significant reporting burden and liability associated with this. 2. Confidentiality/Intellectual Property. Often times, employee handbooks will specify an employees confidentiality obligations and many states impute a duty of loyalty. Contractors are under no such obligations absent a written agreement. Same thing for IP/Creative works. The copyright Act draws a sharp and significant distinction between employees and contractors when it comes to ownership of creative works. 3. Liability for tortious acts. Generally an employer is liable for the tortious acts of its employees under the theory of respondeat superior. An entity hiring a contractor may/may not be liable, but without a written agreement for the contractor to indemnify/defend the hiring entity, their may be little recourse against the contractor. There are many other subtle differences too numerous to mention. I hope you find this helpful.
Re: The Storm Brace a new invention - Hi Breck, To add your signature, click on "User Control Panel" above, then click on "Profile" and then "Edit Signature". You can also add a photo via the "Edit Avatar" link in the Profile section. DH


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

3 Health Insurance Misconceptions

Mistakes Made by New or Inexperienced Sales Staff

Unspoken Yet Important Rules for Book Proposals

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.