|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
(Guest Post) Optimizing Value in the Economic Downturn [and Recovery]
Written by: Jon HansenArticle Overview: This article is the second in a three-part series of guest articles on optimization by Dr. Olga Raskina, Lead Scientist, with Emptoris, the supply and contract management solutions provider. As we push on through the troubled economic environment, corporate leaders are laser focused on bringing supply chain management under tighter financial guidelines. An article I recently read in Supply Chain Digest highlighted the typical urgency felt by procurement managers to cut supply chain costs.
![]() |
Free Download - Is supplier incumbency a major problem with government contracting? By Jon Hansen |
(Guest Post) Optimizing Value in the Economic Downturn [and Recovery]
By Dr. Olga Raskina, Lead Scientist, Emptoris
This article is the second in a three-part series of guest
articles on optimization by Dr. Olga Raskina, Lead Scientist, with
Emptoris, the supply and contract management solutions provider.
As we push on through the troubled economic environment, corporate
leaders are laser focused on bringing supply chain management under
tighter financial guidelines. An article I recently read in Supply Chain Digest highlighted the typical urgency felt by procurement managers to cut supply chain costs.
As I read the article, I thought about how the typical knee-jerk
reaction to reducing costs has often had adverse longer term effects:
strained supplier relationships, diminished quality and diminished
reliability among them.
While managers preach the importance of strategic relationships and
decisions based on total cost, we are sometimes too easily willing to
sacrifice that mantra in an attempt to resolve short term financial
issues. The SDC article quotes one procurement manager as saying,
“Forget about all that strategic stuff. We need to lower our costs
right now.”
Of course, we can identify with the urgency. However, this mindset
seems to ignore the possibility of cutting the costs while maintaining
good supplier relationships — and improving overall business value to
the organization.
I would actually propose that the downturn can in fact be addressed
in a way that is actually beneficial to an organization — specifically
in achieving these seemingly conflicting goals of costs vs. supplier
relationships. The key to success, I believe, is in sourcing
optimization.
Let me provide a brief case. As companies become increasingly
spend-conscious, of course the demand for certain products drops,
leaving suppliers with more inventory than usual and an increased
willingness to sell.
In this environment, many suppliers seek creative ways to improve
sales (and/or decrease inventory) and are often willing to negotiate
new deals. These deals may take the form of volume discounts or better
non-price terms such as decreased delivery time or improved warranties.
And with such offers, comes an opportunity for revision and
reevaluation of the existing purchasing agreements (and strategy).
The ability to analyze all aspects of a deal is critical in taking
advantage of market conditions. For example, a majority incumbent
supplier might have invested in fuel efficient, alternative
specifications that can meet the buyer’s requirements — while a
minority incumbent may have lost a large customer giving him more
capacity to meet the buyer’s volume. An evaluation based primarily on
costs may ignore these supplier realities.
Optimization, part of a bigger science called Operations Research, makes this analysis possible.
Operations Research, in a nutshell, is the discipline of applying
advanced analytics to help make better decisions. Optimization, in
turn, utilizes mathematical algorithms to rapidly solve a business
problem by evaluating “all possible outcomes” (or many outcomes) and
selecting those ones that yield the best solution.
When applied to supply chain operations, optimization helps the
sourcing professional simultaneously evaluate thousands of different
procurement inputs. This evaluation can take into consideration the
global market, specific current supply chain conditions, and individual
supplier conditions, and offers solutions that address the buyer’s [and
supplier's] goals in the best possible way.
Optimization goes far beyond simple spreadsheet-like comparisons. It
helps ensure that no possible scenario or solution is overlooked and no
money is “left on the table.” Although it may sound intensive, with the
correct application of technology it can eliminate weeks of tedious
side-by-side evaluations that attempt to simultaneously analyze the
inputs.
Optimization is often limited by the “human factor.” According to
different studies, a person can attend to 6 to 18 factors of evaluation
simultaneously. However, as you know, any company-wide supply chain
initiative involves thousands of factors and parameters, each affecting
the bottom line.
Optimization-driven technology allows the procurement manager to
evaluate the “new best state” of their supply chain and to react
promptly. This could be as simple as relaying some or all key factors
that affect a decision on suppliers.
By allowing suppliers to compete on more than just cost, you empower
them to be creative. Once the suppliers understand the buyer’s goals,
they can offer alternatives based on their own competitive advantages,
and avoid being squeezed on just price.
Offers based on these competitive advantages might include:
- Alternative Specifications
- Extended Warranty Terms
- Discounts on Packaging
- Rebates for Bulk Orders
Depending on how extensive or creative the buyer wants to get, the
goals of a new relationship might also involve overhauling the supply
chain risk structure. This might include, for example, contemplating a
switch from a single source supplier to a multi-source scenario or a
local to a global operation.
Knowing your true total cost, beyond just price, when creating an agreement is critical.
In sum, I would propose that there are three critical benefits that
Optimization can impart, particularly in an uncertain economic
environment and recovery:
* Rapid response to the changing market conditions, including the
ability to renegotiate existing deals and quickly achieve better total
costs;
* Rapid evaluation of suppliers’ capacity, including the ability to rapidly add more suppliers to the operation;
* Ability to maintain and strengthen supplier relationships.
By making the negotiation about more than price, optimization allows
the suppliers to be creative and offer more complex deals, compete on
different direct and indirect cost factors, and not feel pressured to
simply reduce the price.
Dr. Olga Raskina, Lead Scientist, Emptoris, Inc.
Olga has been an active member of the Institute for Operations
Research and Management Science (INFORMS) for many years, and serves as
vice-chair on the Boston Informs and on the Informs Subdivisions
Council, focusing on promoting the value of Operations Research to
businesses. Olga has Ph.D. degree in Operations Research from
Columbia University.
Editor’s Note: As is the case will all guest posts
I would like to stress that neither Emptoris’ appearance in the
Procurement Insights Blog, nor the positions presented by Dr. Raskina
in the article are to be construed as an endorsement by Procurement
Insights.
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
African Technology Development
The Neglected Art of Receiving
Improve E-mail: Avoid the Quicksand
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



