|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Is Ford’s auto-xchange the “Real Deal?” (Survey Response 1)
Written by: Jon HansenArticle Overview: In a recent video that was released by The Ford Motor Company, Ford's Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Jim Yost indicated that the company has to "share information in real-time" and therefore can no longer use "the sequential processes” in which there were many “handoffs" and "transfers of information." Yost also emphasized the fact that Ford needs to "integrate much more closely with their customers, supply base and even internally," as well as stressing the importance of making information available to multiple levels of their supply base "simultaneously," thereby eschewing the current "cascade processes that might take days, weeks and even months" to disseminate. To enable you to respond to this question, you can access both the video as well as the corresponding article by contacting the author.
![]() |
Free Download - Is supplier incumbency a major problem with government contracting? By Jon Hansen |
Is Ford’s auto-xchange the “Real Deal?” (Survey Response 1)
Response From Roel, Sales Manager, Tilburg, Netherlands
Good question and as always a yes/no answer can not be given although I tend towards a YES.
The vision of creating a 'Single version of the Truth (SVOT)' environment (Chainlink report) is the way forward, I believe. The film however does not tell me anything with regard to the architecture or choices made to realize this. Of course it took them only 6 months.
It seems to focus on customer experience and in that case, the web is a logical choice. To reach full potential however expect that existing B2B solutions (EDI, automotive has come a long way), used by Ford's business partners are integrated as well.
Synergy can be realized by connecting all OEM's and Suppliers to a hub (connect once, connect to all - Elemica) and reduce the complexity of point-to-point connections. This mother of all Hub's (or a combination of existing Hub's) can only exist if B2B communications become a commodity and should be separated from the content as this will remain a way to stand out from competitors. Also, this should not be just an Automotive initiative on the long run.
To create transparency and enable collaboration in a Supply practise, you would still have to solve the issue of ownership and responsibility. Establishing a neutral entity will be difficult working with multiple OEM's and companies will not accept Agent technology or solvers to take discusions for them from day 1 (will they ever?).
Creation of multiple Control Towers or 'Single versions of the truth' created by OEM's partnering, Government (Ports?) or 'neutral' entities seems to be a first step but in my opinion the way forward.
Over the last 2 years, we have created 5 different SVOT's based on innovative services of our integration partner allowing companies to interact (integrate and collaborate) with all their partners. (It's not up to me to evaluate what approach is best).
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Avoid Burnout: Do the Limbo Regularly
Join Conversations Politely, Part 1
Reverse Mentoring
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



