|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Is the framework for an Avro Arrow type demise of the Natural Health Products industry in Canada being laid by Bill C-6?
|
| Guest post by: Jon Hansen |
Article Overview: As part of the series on Natural Health Care products and the Bill C-6 controversy, today’s post delves a little deeper into the key elements of the growing debate. (Note: Why is this important to the world of purchasing and supply chains? When the Avro Arrow program was canceled on February 20th, 1959, it immediately put "14,528 Avro employees out of work, as well as nearly 15,000 other employees in the Avro "supply chain" of outside suppliers.")
![]() |
Free Download - Is supplier incumbency a major problem with government contracting? By Jon Hansen |
Is the framework for an Avro Arrow type demise of the Natural Health Products industry in Canada being laid by Bill C-6?
Referencing the letter from Minister Leona Aglukkaq to the Senators it would appear that she is against the amendments associated with Bill
C-6 as said changes would negatively impact Health Canada's ability to
protect Canadians.
Examples include amendments to clause 14(1) in which the proposed
modification of the "mandatory reporting requirements according to the
Minister weakens the reporting criteria under Bill C-6 by permitting
industry to determine what constitutes a reportable incident." Or
clause 16, which "would require Health Canada to provide a company with
prior notification when it intends to share confidential business
information," even if only sharing basic information such as product or
related model numbers.
Finally, clause 21 of this Act would require Health Canada to have a
warrant to inspect an office. This is problematic in that while having
access to all other areas of a business without the need of a warrant,
it is within a company's office the Minister contends where the most
pertinent information is likely to be kept.
So on one hand you have the Minister of Health pleading for the
removal of amendments that in its opinion limits its ability to act in
the best interests of the public. In other words Health Canada is
basically saying that Bill C-6 doesn't give it enough arbitrary power
to act.
On the other hand, and according to the "Discussion Paper"
from the NHPPA site, even though Bill C-6 "does not “currently” apply
to Natural Health Products, the Bill poses a threat in two ways."
The two ways to which the paper is referring is that Bill C-6 can
through a simple "regulatory amendment" incorporate Natural Health
Products under the banner of consumer products. The second is tied to
the fact that Bill C-6 "sets a dangerous precedent" in that even if
Natural Health Products are not incorporated as part of the original
target of the Bill it will only be a matter of time before similar
"powers" will be extended to include drugs which, reasons the NHPPA
carries a “much higher risk profile than consumer products.” After all,
with 245,000 deaths, and the random prescribing of anti psychotic drugs
to children it would seem to be both logical and reasonable to
institute greater government control over the drug industry.
This is an interesting impasse in that you have the Ministry saying
that amendments to Bill C-6 are too weak. Conversely the NHPPA believes
that through either a regulatory amendment to reclassify it as a
consumer product or an extension of the Bill’s powers to include drugs
(the category under which the industry is currently regulated) a
serious threat exists on multiple levels not the least of which is
arbitrary search and seizure without due process.
As it stands exclusion or inclusion is not what is relevant. The
mere existence of Bill C-6, especially with a favorable adherence to
the Minister of Health's requests means that the Natural Health Product
industry is vulnerable.
Now some may argue that under the second scenario, even with the
tighter controls, Natural Health Products are being treated the same as
pharmaceutical company products. Some might even suggest that this is
beneficial in that the NHPPA would have a powerful ally in critical
areas such as challenging the contentious search and seizure powers
proposed by the Ministry.
However, the real concern is that while equal in principle, the
Natural Health Products industry is at a disadvantage for a number of
reasons including; a) the pharmaceutical industry has considerably more
money and power with which to fight arbitrary actions on the part of
the Health Ministry - a level of resources that are simply not
available to the NHPPA and, b) the pharmaceutical companies have
considerably more lobbying power through which they can influence
decisions and even investigations. The Natural Health Products industry
lacks this legislative presence.
So, if you were to look at Bill C-6 in the worst possible light,
providing the Ministry with the ability to exert greater power over the
Natural Health Products industry through either inclusion or extension
leaves the sector in no man's land. This would perhaps pave the way for
the Pharmaceutical industry to expand "their" natural health product
market share. Think of it as a kind of industry euthanasia of the
Natural Health Products industry if you will.
In business by the way, this is a classic move. By keeping the
intended target busy over here (re Bill C-6), the “powerful”
pharmaceutical companies gain control of an important market, while
maintaining an air of innocence as it is the big bad government who is
taking the action. Although different, the Avro Arrow comes to mind.
Whether they know it or not, the Natural Health Products industry is possibly on the endangered species list.
|
About the Author: Jon Hansen RSS for Jon's articles - Visit Jon's website Personal Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jwhansen Click here to visit Jon's website The Power of the Blog What are the 3 biggest challenges faced by supply chainpurchasing professionals today Survey Result 15 Double Marginalization and the Point of Ideal Price Viability Privatizing MultiTransactional Supplier Platforms Within the Public Sector Part 2 What is a reasonable cost model for providing a 3PL warehouse management service Survey Result 3 |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Setting Goals for your Home Based Business
Smart & Simple Internet Techniques
How To Calculate A Minimum Fee For Your Services
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



