Tweet

Managing the Process of Automation: Leveraging Capabilities Without Forfeiting Accountability

Written by: Jon Hansen

Article Overview: "It ain't easy leading a software company these days. Customers are sick of poor quality, inadequate security, old-fashioned business models, and pie-in-the-sky claims for trends like open source. They just want software that works. That was the message coming from customers, industry experts, and even some company executives at the Software 2005 conference last week in Santa Clara, California. from "Execs Tell Software Makers: Some of You Are Doomed," by David Kirkpatrick (May 6, 2005)

Managing the Process of Automation: Leveraging Capabilities Without Forfeiting Accountability

"It ain't easy leading a software company these days. Customers are sick of poor quality, inadequate security, old-fashioned business models, and pie-in-the-sky claims for trends like open source. They just want software that works. That was the message coming from customers, industry experts, and even some company executives at the Software 2005 conference last week in Santa Clara, California.

from "Execs Tell Software Makers: Some of You Are Doomed," by David Kirkpatrick (May 6, 2005)

This was one of those articles that resonated with me from the moment I first read it in 2005, to where I sit even today.

While the "some of you are doomed" statement by senior executives from corporations such as BP, Kaiser Permanente, Lockheed Martin and Unilever inspired diverse coverage by countless writers, the central theme remained relatively consistent. Specifically, and according to one account "business leaders are really steamed" that it takes an inordinate amount of time to "install and deploy software," and even longer to derive any meaningful "value."

From a personal perspective, I can certainly attest to this fact as my own experience with EDS saw considerable budget overruns and consistently inferior results. This despite my considerable investment of time to attend multiple JAD sessions as they were called to outline the framework for the application they were hired to build.

In retrospect, it is clear that the EDS model was structured more around a disconnected utilization of bench time capabilities by diverse and at times competing teams of developers. Think of it as having different parts of an automobile built by different car manufactures from different regions of the world. Each wants to demonstrate that their way is the better way, and rather than collaborate toward a collective best result, they work in competitive silos never really checking to see if the individual components will actually fit together let alone work as a single, cohesive unit.

Even though the 2005 article appeared years after my misguided foray into the realms of enterprise application development, I did gain some sense of a "I am not as dumb as I thought I was" vindication, as I was according to Fortune, not alone in my experience.

As I read further, I also discovered that there had been a significant increase in the percentage of organizations that were opting to repatriate software development back in-house. While I could not un-ring the past development nightmare bell, my first decision post EDS turned out to be a sound one in that I had chosen to keep future development under my own roof. The end result of this strategy was a far more robust solution that was produced at a fraction of the cost and time, as compared to the sizable sum I had squandered on an application that never quite got there with EDS.

Now here is the key point . . . the only reason it succeeded was due in large part to tight controls and the experience of those involved in the development process. To be succinct, we maintained both capability and accountability for the project from start to finish.

This leads to an obvious question, what if you do not have the internal capabilities to effectively manage the development process within your organization? What are the options? Enter offshore outsourcing.

Unfortunately, the offshore outsourcing of software development requirements can quickly become a fools gold promise that are more reflective of the "results" highlighted in the Fortune 2005 piece. That is if you outsource accountability as well as capability.

What I am of course talking about is the importance of maintaining the same degree of responsibility for the project as if it were truly an in-house effort. This includes the coordination of a collaborative process with different stakeholders involving the integration and tracking of requirement definitions, problem resolution and application testing.

Now many of the companies who outsource indicate they do so for a variety of reasons including the need to focus on their core competencies, or the absence of the necessary skill sets, as well as budgetary considerations. While these provide a reasonable basis for making the decision to outsource, they are not a Carte Blanche excuse for surrendering accountability for the project's success.

For this reason enterprise-requirements software providers like Blueprint can help companies maintain the delicate yet critical balance between outsourcing unique skill sets, without forfeiting the control that is necessary to ensure a cost effective, on-time end result.

Related Articles
  Lead Generation & Marketing Automation How-To Guide
  Accountability Partnerships Series Conclusion
  The power of leveraging a system
  Values
  A culture of accountability is the key to business and organisational success

Article Tags: bench time, budget overruns, business models, company executives, david kirkpatrick, different regions, inadequate security, inferior results, jad sessions, kaiser permanente, lockheed martin, meaningful value, parts of an automobile, personal perspective, pie in the sky, regions of the world, santa clara california, senior executives, silos, software makers



Related Forum Posts
The Old Girl's Network - (2003) - Haven't read this one yet... Contents A business of one's own: setting the stage Passion: Turning what you love into a real business Vision: Bringing Your Idea Into the World Pioneering Spirit: Discovering new frontiers Tenacity: Passions Bulldog Raising Capital: Translating your vision into dollars and cents Focus, feedback and flexibility Leadership lessons Life after the survival stage: Managing onward There's a Took Kit in the back that has lots of good stuff, including: Outline for competitive analysis: the basic issues to address before starting your company Outline for executive summary and business plan, with sample summary Explanation of non-disclosure agreement Milestone setting "Do you have what it takes" quiz Sample financing term sheet Due Diligence checklist Sample advisory agreement Process and systems review Outsourcing overview
Re: How To Promote Your Biz While On Holiday... - Automation is really great. Before I took this long break, I wrote a few articles and some short blog posts. I entered all of them to my blog and scheduled the publication time. This way my blog was getting updated every other day, without me thinking about it. I also went to all my favorite TEs and assigned all the credits and impressions I had. Submitting article to article directories, using SYA, and article marketers. Just set it and forget it.
Re: HRPreneur - Evan, I am looking for new clients and to see if my business model resonates with Entrepreneurs. Thanks Joey Walters, CHRP, H.R.C.C.C. Managing Director HRPreneur Inc. C. 647-534-4774
Re: Startup blogs - Hi Jason, This is a good thread to revive. In his book,The 4-Hour Workweek, Tim Ferris divides the meat into four key sections that spell DEAL! 1. D = Definition 2. E = Elimination 3. A = Automation 4. L = Liberation I think the point about an "exceptional blog" is certainly valid. My guess is that Tim Ferris is referring to bland, boring blogs that managers are paying junior employees to "maintain". Complete waste of resources. But, for us work-at-home-onliners getting started with a blog is one of the best things we can do, and if it fails to make us any money, it's only because it is not exceptional enough, or because the products it promotes are not what people are looking for. DH
Re: Hello from Bangladesh - Hello Kevin, Thank you for replying back to my message. There are many business goals for this year including but not limited to: 1. Managing long term partnership contracts from more clients. 2. Cross-border expansion - open our first overseas office at New York, USA. 3. Progressing smoothly to our road to CMMI certification. 4. Introduce a new service - call center operation. Best Regards Hasnaeen


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

SEO and the Entrepreneur

10 Golden rules to survive the Global Crisis

When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Log On

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.