Synchronization Versus Compression Should Guide Government Procurement Policy (200th POST)
Synchronization Versus Compression Should Guide Government Procurement Policy (200th POST)
On one hand you have the Government of Canada who despite earlier hopes has once again reverted to muscling a shared services platform down the unwilling throats of stakeholders, the majority of whom oppose the current direction. A move which is ironically being introduced at the expense of the very business and innovation the mandate is purported to protect.
On the other hand, you have the Commonwealth of Virginia whose eVA program has been one of the few bright spots (I actually used the word beacon in a recent speech) in a sea of failed public sector initiatives perhaps heading precipitously towards a self-destructive end. What’s the old term, “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?” (Note: Read Part 1 and Part 2 of my recent Virginia posts for further details.)
The one common element, besides the irony that both the Government of Canada’s and Virginia’s programs were launched in 2001, is the paucity of either statistical or empirical proof to support the current mandates. For example Virginia’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee’s (JLARC) reference to a survey, in which 95 out of a possible 46,000 stakeholders responded, as one of several reasons for their review is difficult to grasp. However, this is still light year’s ahead of the Canadian Government’s shared services strategy whose merits are reflected in the kind of “tastes great, less filling” statements offered by individuals such as ITAC President Bernard Courtois. Bernard, who is a gentleman’s gentleman and someone I genuinely like, was quoted in an April 20th article by Kathryn May in the Ottawa Citizen as saying that “We have been telling the government it buys piece parts at excellent prices, but it could save a lot more money by buying a total product.” Unfortunately, there has been no data provided to support such a claim.
Sorry Bernard, but the promise of increased savings has been proffered before and therefore has the substantive creditability of a Hollywood movie set – you know the ones where the town’s buildings are merely facades supported by skeletal frames behind the scenes.
In the end, the government would be better served through a synchronization of stakeholder capabilities versus a compression of players. If you would like to find out more about the differences between synchronization versus compression, feel free to drop me a line via the author bio.
In the meantime, for those of us who have watched the antics associated with public sector procurement policy planning (sounds similar to the peter-piper-picked-a-peck-of-pickled-peppers tongue twister), gradually unfold on an increasingly public stage, we can only be grateful for the unending supply of anecdotal punchlines from an ever evolving cast of characters. Even though we take this matter very seriously, based of past experience we have learned that immediate, knee jerk reactions accomplish very little given the propensity for sudden, and inexplicable directional changes. Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio, or in this instance David Marshall?
All I can say is thank God for Susan Boyle!
Synchronization Versus Compression Should Guide Government Procurement Policy 200th POST - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Government is never boring.
On one hand you have the Government of Canada who despite earlier hopes has once again reverted to muscling a shared services platform down the unwilling throats of stakeholders, the majority of whom oppose the current direction. A move which is ironically being introduced at the expense of the very business and innovation the mandate is purported to protect.
On the other hand, you have the Commonwealth of Virginia whose eVA program has been one of the few bright spots (I actually used the word beacon in a recent speech) in a sea of failed public sector initiatives perhaps heading precipitously towards a self-destructive end. What’s the old term, “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?” (Note: Read Part 1 and Part 2 of my recent Virginia posts for further details.)
The one common element, besides the irony that both the Government of Canada’s and Virginia’s programs were launched in 2001, is the paucity of either statistical or empirical proof to support the current mandates. For example Virginia’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee’s (JLARC) reference to a survey, in which 95 out of a possible 46,000 stakeholders responded, as one of several reasons for their review is difficult to grasp. However, this is still light year’s ahead of the Canadian Government’s shared services strategy whose merits are reflected in the kind of “tastes great, less filling” statements offered by individuals such as ITAC President Bernard Courtois. Bernard, who is a gentleman’s gentleman and someone I genuinely like, was quoted in an April 20th article by Kathryn May in the Ottawa Citizen as saying that “We have been telling the government it buys piece parts at excellent prices, but it could save a lot more money by buying a total product.” Unfortunately, there has been no data provided to support such a claim.
Sorry Bernard, but the promise of increased savings has been proffered before and therefore has the substantive creditability of a Hollywood movie set – you know the ones where the town’s buildings are merely facades supported by skeletal frames behind the scenes.
In the end, the government would be better served through a synchronization of stakeholder capabilities versus a compression of players. If you would like to find out more about the differences between synchronization versus compression, feel free to drop me a line via the author bio.
In the meantime, for those of us who have watched the antics associated with public sector procurement policy planning (sounds similar to the peter-piper-picked-a-peck-of-pickled-peppers tongue twister), gradually unfold on an increasingly public stage, we can only be grateful for the unending supply of anecdotal punchlines from an ever evolving cast of characters. Even though we take this matter very seriously, based of past experience we have learned that immediate, knee jerk reactions accomplish very little given the propensity for sudden, and inexplicable directional changes. Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio, or in this instance David Marshall?
All I can say is thank God for Susan Boyle!
Synchronization Versus Compression Should Guide Government Procurement Policy 200th POST - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Staging DivaDebra Gould, aka The Staging Diva®, is President of Six Elements Inc., an internationally recognized home staging company. Inspired by many requests from aspiring home stagers wanting to start similar businesses, Gould created the Staging Diva Home Staging Business Training Program. Gould has trained over 1000 Staging Diva Graduates worldwide to start staging businesses. Buying decorating and selling six of her own homes in four years lead to an interest in real estate staging which she turned into a career with the launch of sixelements.com in 2002. Since then she has staged hundreds of homes in addition to teaching home staging training. Gould is the author of several home staging resources including a series of popular ebooks made up of a Design Guide, Color Guide and Portfolio Guide. For more information about Debra Gould visit stagingdiva.com. - Visit Staging Diva's Website |
|||
Cheryl MatthynssensCheryl is a life skills coach, licensed Chemical Dependency Counselor and a 20 year entrepreneur. Cheryl's dedication to achieving a life of balance led to her expanding her teaching from the simple managing of life's daily challenges to adding financial well being as well. A direct marketer with DrinkACT, she is gaining ground in the online community with her concepts of making sure business owners, entreprenuers and employees have well rounded life styles. She opened up a small affiliate site - The Balance Guide- to help others find resources for mental and emotional well being. Visit Cheryl's blog to see more of the diversity beyond business she has began offering online at www.thebalanceguide.blogspot.com - Visit Cheryl Matthynssens's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jon's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Caprino Career Path Assessment Start Right 9 Questions From New Marketers How to Get a Life Double Digit Growth eguide |
|
 | ||
 |
Top 50 Franchising Blogs
Top 50 Franchising Blogs | |
 |
Top 50 Blogs For Startups
Top Blogs To Watch In 2009 | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||