Tweet

The Ariba Interviews: Re-engineering the Future of On-Demand?

Written by: Jon Hansen

Article Overview: Earlier this month I was contacted by Ariba’s PR firm indicating that they wanted to schedule an interview between myself and a senior executive from the company. The purpose for the interview was to discuss Ariba’s latest contract win in the Healthcare sector. For those of you who may not already be aware, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey will be, and I quote “leveraging Ariba’s on-demand Procure-to-Pay offering to drive savings, efficiencies and competitive advantage.” (Note: here is a link to the actual press release; http://www.ariba.com/company/news.cfm?pressid=2672).

The Ariba Interviews: Re-engineering the Future of On-Demand?

Earlier this month I was contacted by Ariba’s PR firm indicating that they wanted to schedule an interview between myself and a senior executive from the company. The purpose for the interview was to discuss Ariba’s latest contract win in the Healthcare sector. For those of you who may not already be aware, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey will be, and I quote “leveraging Ariba’s on-demand Procure-to-Pay offering to drive savings, efficiencies and competitive advantage.” (Note: here is a link to the actual press release; http://www.ariba.com/company/news.cfm?pressid=2672).

The timing of their call was interesting in that I had just read an article which had appeared in the August 9th issue of Supply Chain Digest proclaiming that the halcyon days of the pre-internet “bubble crash” had returned for supply chain software providers. Citing “strong” increases in stock values, and a spate of new contract signings, I could not help but wonder if this latest press release from Ariba would be lost in the celebratory noise of the “happy days are here again” atmosphere implied by the article’s author. In an earlier posting I had referred to the growing cynicism of procurement professionals who, being inundated with press releases and announcements of exciting breakthroughs, have for the most part discounted “brand-centric” promotion as a reliable indicator of a vendor’s ability to deliver results.

Based on this trend, I could not understand Ariba’s (or for that matter any other vendors’) decision to employ what is certainly a jaded if not outdated method of promoting their product’s virtues. Specifically, are press releases designed to succor existing clients by telling them that a new account meant that they had made the right decision? Or is it believed to be an enticement for prospective clients being the equivalent of the old saying come on in, the water’s fine? Perhaps it is a little bit of both.

With this as the backdrop, I went into the first of what became three separate interviews over a two week period with both an open mind and a flexible ear. Joined on the call by a member of the PR Firm, and an in-house PR representative, I listened to the executive’s responses to my obligatory questions involving the new contract. While interesting to a degree there was very little said that would stand out from any other vendor interview. In short, and to no ones discredit it was another infomercial.

The Importance of Vendor Financial Performance?

For example, the PR Firm’s assertion that Ariba’s recent earnings combined with the 108% growth in their on-demand client base means very little to what is becoming an increasingly sophisticated market. Especially when there is an absence of a point of reference by which said growth can be compared or quantified.

And this is my issue with the Ariba announcement as it is with the majority of all vendor announcements.

What is particularly egregious about this archaic practice of platitude filled, self-congratulatory press releases is that it actually undermines what I believe is a sound overall strategy. In this particular case the decision by Ariba to be one of the first to move toward an on-demand (now commonly referred to as a software-as-a-service or SaaS) product offering. (Note: a November 14th, 2005 article in eWeek.com titled Ariba Follows the On-Demand Trend, Renee Boucher Ferguson reported that software companies from “Microsoft Corp. to SAP AG and Oracle Corp. were also embracing the on-demand model” at that time.)

With recent stories such as today’s (August 30th, 2007) article in Canadian Business On-line (ERP: Small fish, big sea by Mike Ouellette) in which both hosted ERP and SaaS were identified as a potential competitive advantage for smaller ERP providers, the attempt by a vendor to differentiate their organization through the announcement of a contract win, or by making reference to financial performance and percentage increases is largely ineffectual. In fact this time worn(out) practice has limited upside in today’s market. But it does have a definite downside. I will illustrate my point.

The PR team provided me with a July 25th, 2007 press release that reported Ariba’s third quarter results for fiscal year 2007. The numbers are as follows; total revenues for the third quarter were $75.6 million, as compared with $73.6 million for Q3 of 2006. Net loss for the third quarter of fiscal year 2007 was $2.0 million (or $0.03 per share for those who follow the stock market), as compared to a $31.5 million loss ($0.48 per share) for the same quarter in 2006.

Referring once again to Ouellette’s article, St. Paul, Minnesota-based Lawson software (NASDAQ:LWSN) which “develops ERP systems for SMEs in the manufacturing, financial and healthcare industries” has seen their stock rise 50% since August 2006. (According to the August 9th Software Digest article, Ariba experienced a 19% growth over the same period.) Lawson’s fiscal year end-revenue grew to US $212.9 million from $126.1 million last year, which resulted in an $8.1 million quarterly profit.

While Lawson may not be a supply chain software vendor, companies such as JDA and Manhattan Associates which are in the Ariba space have also posted considerably stronger numbers with a growth rate of 37% and 30% respectively. Based on these results, the implications of focusing on financial performance is pretty clear. If you were a prospective customer and areas such as overall profitability and growth percentages were determining factors in your decision, with who would you choose to do business?

This is what I mean by a definite downside. Using financial data or growth percentages (i.e. the 108%) as an indication of market acceptance for one’s product is unlikely to stimulate consumer confidence. However, it does have the potential to marginalize an organization’s sales efforts.

Quite frankly, I have yet to speak with a procurement professional who honestly considers financial data to be more than a perfunctory issue that is usually addressed before the first meeting.

Please do not misunderstand me. I am not attempting to discount the general importance of a financially stable organization. What I am saying however, is that its relevance is misdirected when it is used as a marketing tool.

More Important Questions

In the two subsequent interviews in which the PR representatives were participants, I asked a number of questions including what was the driving force behind Ariba’s original decision to as they put it “re-engineer” their software to adapt to the on-demand or SaaS world? Was there a concern that the new business model would cannibalize their traditional business rather than expand their market share into new areas such as the SME community? Was there a point in which they would come to a fork in the road and have to embrace one model over the other? In short, how will customers (and prospective customers) respond to their strategy in the long run?

Ariba was unable to provide definitive answers to these as well as other questions by the time our final interview had concluded. A member of their PR team did indicate that they would send me the information at a later date for inclusion in a future post.

While I will look forward to providing you with the Ariba responses when they are available, perhaps the key to their success as well as the success of the other software goliaths can be found in today’s “Little fish, big sea” article.

According to Simon Bragg, research director for enterprise software at ARC Advisory Group, smaller ERP providers are successful because of their ability to exploit what he referred to as niche markets. Combined with IDC’s Joel Martin’s position that the SaaS model provides smaller players with a competitive advantage, offers some insight into the success these firms have experienced in terms of client acceptance at the SME level.

That said Bragg cautions that “SAP and Oracle are getting exceedingly good at identifying niches which could be served with only minor tweaks to their core products.” “For years” according to Bragg “SAP couldn’t do it,” however as they develop their capabilities in response to market changes, the “niches” as he calls them are “disappearing fast.”

While Ariba may have “started down the on-demand path inadvertently” (at least according to the previously referenced November 2005 eWeek.com article), CEO Calderoni’s statement that “we are now putting powerful spend management results within the reach of every company, regardless of size” leads one to believe that they should pay closer attention to these “smaller” fish.

Note: To obtain a complete listing including links for the materials referenced in this post send me an e-mail at jhansen@procureinsights.com and put “Ariba” in the subject line.

Related Articles
  There’s a slow, slow train comin’ up around the bend: Epilog for the Ariba Interviews
  Development of SAAS Based Applications
  Member Question Regarding Ariba Experience
  Who will be the supply chain poster child in 5 to 10 years?
  Riding the Crest of a New Wave: How the Original SaaS Companies Have Gained the Upper Hand (PI Intelligence Bite)

Article Tags: blue cross blue shield, blue cross blue shield of new jersey, contract signings, enticement, halcyon days, happy days, healthcare sector, horizon blue cross blue shield, horizon blue cross blue shield of new jersey, internet bubble, new contract, pr firm, procurement professionals, prospective clients, right decision, software providers, spate, stock values, succor, supply chain software



Related Forum Posts
Future Financial Corporation - I've never heard of Future Financial Corporation is this a new company?
Re: How do you back up your computer? - Seems like backup has definitely hit a nerve. Evan, thanks for sharing your experience with the Backblaze service. Regarding the time it takes to backup: * The initial backup will take a little while (one to two weeks for most users) depending on your Internet upload connection and the amount of data you have. You can click the "How long will my first backup take?" link to find out the estimate for you. * Future backups will be very quick as Backblaze will only backup new files and the pieces of those that have changed. Thanks! Gleb
Patent Walk-Through - Hello everyone! My name is Alex, I'm 18 years old and I'm constantly drawing up new ideas and inventing stuff. I sketch stuff down everywhere I go and on anything I can write on. I'm a big member of our local Future Business Leaders of America chapter (FBLA). In the future I hope to work my way up to being a Venture Capitalist. I think of myself as a pretty creative person who is very motivated. Some of the ideas and inventions I come up with are pretty far out but others I consider marketable and to have great potential. Being 18, I have little to no connections and no resources. I've been surfing this site pretty frequently for the last year and have finally decided to join the forum group. Anyway, here's my question... Basically, I have no idea how to get a patent together the costs and the overall process. As of now, I think I have a great idea that, as far as I know has not, ever been done before. I'm really excited about this idea. I'm a total novice at this and am willing to learn all that I can. Any information that you can provide me with would be great. Again the main things I want to know are: 1.Overall Process. 2.How Long It Takes. 3.Costs. 4.Anything That You Think I Should Know. 5.Tips/Experiences. 6.Confidentiality. 7.Must I Make A Physical Model of My Idea? Thanks guys! -Alex
Re: your personality type? - Hi Zac, If you're on the fence about 2 and 3, I'd think more about them. Big picture people tend to be oblivious to the detail of what is happening NOW -- the colors on a restaurant wall, the layout of someone's apartment, the color of people's shirts at a party, etc. They instead notice the "theme" -- an upscale restaurant (who knows what color), casual shirts at a party (not sure what style), etc. A "trendy" apartment, but who knows where the bathroom was. Gut feeling people tend to act w/o all the facts, and are comfortable following that instinct. "Thinker" people will choose something even if they HATE it, just because it "makes sense." Where as that makes no sense to a gut person. Thinkers are more "black and white" where as gut instinct feelers are more "gray area" people. But going with your selections... 1. Within 2. Big Picture 3. Gut Feeling 4. Spontaneous The Reflective Seeker of Truth. You are a passionate searcher of big-picture meaning and strive to help others with your empathetic listening skills. Socially, you are usually quiet, but can be a social butterfly when you feel like it, though it can be draining to do so for too long. You have a very silly and goofy side, enjoy people and need time to quietly reflect #1 Strength: Predicting Future Likelihoods #2 Strength: Expressing Social Feeling Predicting Future Likelihoods Predicting what is likely to happen, based on past events, themes, or what has historically been true. Deciding what will happen, based on past events. These predictions are usually spoken with con?dence and certainty. A thread or common idea is drawn from the past, and these ideas are used to decide what will happen in the future. Authorities and past situations are extremely important for deciding what will happen in the future. Expressing Social Feeling Setting an emotional tone, vibrant, energetic, or serious, etc. Concerned with the emotional environment as it?s happening -- the vibe of people at a party, the tone of a situation, other people?s responses. Setting the tone -- dramatic and serious, or lighthearted and a celebration. Emotional displays are important for knowing how others are feeling, whether bad or good. Someone talking in a monotone about feelings seems insincere. Feels should be shown, so they can be read by others. If that is your type, your #1 match would be... The Strong-Willed Go-Getter. You are a bold sculptor of the here-and-now in order to achieve immediate results following a logical system for making decisions. You add a fun, upbeat vibe to social events and are often the most gregarious person in the room. #1 Strength: Commander of Physical Space #2 Strength: Systematic/Rule Logic
How to valuate a business - Hi Garth - here is how we did it at Northern Crown Capital when I was helping them raise venture capital for Toronto-based entrepreneurs. Assume the start date is 2003 so 2008 projections are 5 years out: How Northern Crown Capital Valuates a Business 2008 Financial Projections Earnings Before Tax $5,865,000 Tax Rate 42% Taxes $2,463,300 Net Earnings $3,401,700 Amount Seeking to Raise Today $3,500,000 Discounted Value of Future Opportunity, 5 Years Out 2008 P/E Ratio 15 Value of Company in 2008 $51,025,500 Discount Rate Applied 30% Year 2008 $51,025,500 Year 2007 $35,717,850 Year 2006 $25,002,495 Year 2005 $17,501,747 Year 2004 $12,251,223 Value of Company at Investment in 2003 $12,251,223 Less: Investment Amount $3,500,000 Present Value $8,751,223 Discount for Risk & Private Company 40% Less: Discount for Risk & Private Company $3,500,489 Private Company Value $5,250,734 Present Value (What the Owner Keeps) $5,250,734 60.00% Financing (What the Investor Gets) $3,500,000 40.00% Total $8,750,734 100.00% I hope this helps!


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Adjusting Your World

Improve E-mail: Avoid the Quicksand

SEO Link Popularity and the Home Business Website

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.