Tweet

The Buy American Policy: A Clear and Present Danger?

Written by: Jon Hansen

Article Overview: In April 2009, Trade Minister Stockwell Day expressed concern that what at the time was the proposed "Buy American" bill was representative of the same kind of U.S. protectionism "that fueled the Great Depression in the 1930's. Citing the "Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930" (Smoot-Stonehouse Tariff Act), Canadian Chamber of Commerce President Perrin Beatty suggested that the "danger with something like this is that its a spark in the forest."

The Buy American Policy: A Clear and Present Danger?

In April 2009, Trade Minister Stockwell Day expressed concern that what at the time was the proposed "Buy American" bill was representative of the same kind of U.S. protectionism "that fueled the Great Depression in the 1930's.

Citing the "Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930" (Smoot-Stonehouse Tariff Act), Canadian Chamber of Commerce President Perrin Beatty suggested that the "danger with something like this is that its a spark in the forest."

From a global community perspective World Trade Organization director-general Pascal Lamy warned that trade barriers "will make the global economy worse."

While there are to be certain, parallels that can be drawn between the Smoot-Stonehouse Tariff Act which was signed into law on June 17th, 1930 and resulted in raised tariffs on 20,000 imported goods into the United States, and the current day Buy American requirements in the U.S. Recovery Act, are they really the same. Is it really U.S. protectionism or autarky?

How does the fact that we now live in a vastly different world than the one our parents lived in when the Smoot-Stonehouse Tariff Act was passed in 1930 change the cause and effect dynamics of the Buy America policy? Is today's interdependent globalized economy that includes emerging knowledge-based industries that much different from the agricultural-industrial sectors that drove a nation's economic engine in the 1930s.

As demonstrated by both Minister Day's and Mr. Beatty's references, the Smoot- Stonehouse Tariff Act is considered by many to have been a major factor in terms of causing the 1930's Great Depression. But is the enduring legacy of the 1930 act manifesting itself in the Canadian Government's offer to guarantee the U.S. "access to the provinces’ public purchases in exchange for a quick waiver of Buy American provisions?" If it is, would one be tempted to see the strategy as being more in line with the old saying that "generals are always fighting the last war," rather than an effective present-day response to what may very well be an entirely different set of circumstances?

Another element of this discussion for which clarity of impact is required relates to the Canadian companies that according to some reports "have been frozen" out of lucrative American stimulus-spending contracts. What sector or sectors of the economy do these organizations represent, and is regaining this lost access worth enough to the Canadian economy as whole to justify what one article suggested is an offer that "would effectively throw city and provincial transit and road-building contracts open to guaranteed U.S. competition." It would not be unreasonable to assume that the U.S. Government would not accept merely having access to these kinds of contracts as sufficient reason to waive the Buy American policy. One would suspect that with the granting of access the U.S.-based suppliers would be favorably placed to win a lions share of the contracts. Otherwise why would the Americans agree to what would amount to nothing more than a empty gesture.

This then brings us back to one of many important questions for which at this point in time there are no clear answers. For example, are the companies (and the industry sectors within which they operate) that will benefit the most from the trade promises being made by the Canadian Government significant contributors to the overall health of our domestic economy? Are these industry sectors part of the mid to long-term economic picture? Upon which domestic sectors is guaranteed access to "the provinces’ public purchases" likely to have the greatest negative impact? Are these sectors part of the mid to long-term Canadian economic picture?

I once traded away Bobby Orr and Phil Esposito rookie cards for a 5 cent tri-colored super ball. Good thing they were my older brother's cards else I would have really felt like I had been taken to the cleaners.

Banking on a statute of limitations for trading card infractions, I had no idea what the rookie cards were worth. Without having a clear cut understanding of the true human and financial impact, are the trade promises being offered in exchange for the Buy American waiver going to be our government's super ball?

I for one do not have the answers, and the burden associated with navigating the complex and potentially highly charged waters of this particular issue, must weigh heavy on the shoulders of our government leaders. But we do need clarity one way or the other. This includes not only the estimates and expectations of the present course of action being pursued. It also includes a equally clear understanding of the inherent risks.

Over the next five weeks leading up to our September 28th PI Window on Business broadcast "Is The Canadian Government Bartering Away The Domestic SME Market?" I will be posting at least one article per week on the Buy American story.

Upcoming posts will examine the differences between the economic climate in 1930 and 2009 to determine if there are indeed parallels to be drawn and used to achieve a collective best result outcome. I will also examine the differences between the Smoot-Stonehouse Tariff Act and the current Buy American requirements associated with the present U.S. Recovery Act. Is it as many fear protectionism revisited, or is it more Autarky?

Trade Minister Stockwell Day to be a guest on the September 28th PI Window on Business Show

Over the past couple of days I have had a number of exchanges with Minister Day's office, and based on the last e-mail I received the Minister will in fact join myself and a distinguished guest panel on-air to provide a brief overview of the government's strategy relating to the Buy American policy.

Given his incredibly busy schedule, it will be a brief appearance in which we will provide the Minister with an uninterrupted platform to share his insights with us on this important issue. At the conclusion of the Minister's talk, a guest panel of both Canadian as well as international experts will discuss what was said, as well as provide their own take on what the Buy American policy means both domestically as well as globally.

Related Articles
  5.1 The SME Development Policy (SMEDP): Support for Growth-oriented Women Entrepreneurs in Tanzania, 2005
  OVERCOMING STRESS
  Ready, Set . . . GOALS!
  Auto Insurance Companies - How To Cancel A Policy
  Term Life Insurance Quotes

Article Tags: canadian chamber of commerce, commerce president, community perspective, director general pascal lamy, economic engine, global economy, globalized economy, great depression, industrial sectors, knowledge based industries, organization director, perrin beatty, protectionism, public purchases, recovery act, smoot hawley act, stockwell day, tariff act, trade minister, world trade organization



Related Forum Posts
How to valuate a business - Hi Garth - here is how we did it at Northern Crown Capital when I was helping them raise venture capital for Toronto-based entrepreneurs. Assume the start date is 2003 so 2008 projections are 5 years out: How Northern Crown Capital Valuates a Business 2008 Financial Projections Earnings Before Tax $5,865,000 Tax Rate 42% Taxes $2,463,300 Net Earnings $3,401,700 Amount Seeking to Raise Today $3,500,000 Discounted Value of Future Opportunity, 5 Years Out 2008 P/E Ratio 15 Value of Company in 2008 $51,025,500 Discount Rate Applied 30% Year 2008 $51,025,500 Year 2007 $35,717,850 Year 2006 $25,002,495 Year 2005 $17,501,747 Year 2004 $12,251,223 Value of Company at Investment in 2003 $12,251,223 Less: Investment Amount $3,500,000 Present Value $8,751,223 Discount for Risk & Private Company 40% Less: Discount for Risk & Private Company $3,500,489 Private Company Value $5,250,734 Present Value (What the Owner Keeps) $5,250,734 60.00% Financing (What the Investor Gets) $3,500,000 40.00% Total $8,750,734 100.00% I hope this helps!
Re: Recommendations for going Wireless - There is one that has popped up in the past couple years called Clear. I had even considered becoming a local distributor, but decided against it since there was enough competition in my area already. Might want to check into that GT.
Re: New Funding Source Now LIVE! - [quote="ideasuniversity":3lio17iz]I have checked the site and it seems it for American Entrepreneurs only. Please correct me if I am wrong[/quote:3lio17iz] You are correct. I wanted to limit it to the U.S. in order to keep the legalities more simplified and under control. Also, there are plenty of other organizations doing their part to help the "world". I was interested in helping my own neighbors and fellow American entrepreneurs.
Re: New Funding Source Now LIVE! - [quote="bizdev":3vzftwj4][quote="ideasuniversity":3vzftwj4]I have checked the site and it seems it for American Entrepreneurs only. Please correct me if I am wrong[/quote:3vzftwj4] You are correct. I wanted to limit it to the U.S. in order to keep the legalities more simplified and under control. Also, there are plenty of other organizations doing their part to help the "world". I was interested in helping my own neighbors and fellow American entrepreneurs.[/quote:3vzftwj4] I think that was a pretty wise move as taking it to other countries is can become very involved with different laws and currencies etc. Good luck with your business. MichelleJ
Re: How to be green? - Hi Evan It’s a great topic especially when it comes to going green and saving our planet. We all have a role to play and we are happy about the fact that we are into it. We have recently made our workplace greener and in the process the following changes have been implemented – 1. We provide paper invoices only if customers ask for them. Otherwise, all our invoicing is done electronically (a PDF via e-mail). 2. We have replaced the Paper Cups at our Cafeteria with Mugs for not only our in-house requirements but also for our clients. 3. We have also made it a Company policy to use only eco-friendly electronic appliances and that includes bulbs, air conditioners. 4. We are in the process of putting it into the Policy that the Employees will have to take to other transportation media – other than their personal vehicles – on at least a day per week to office. Hope we are on the right track. Regards,


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Tips for the Novice Traveler

Ten Things You Can Do To Be a Better Leader

The new marketing question. Will they follow?

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.