The Number 1 Question Can A Consultant Really Make a Difference
The Number 1 Question Can A Consultant Really Make a Difference
This is one of those rare instances when I wear the hats of an unbiased and neutral writer as well as a consultant (I write and teach accredited courses for associations such as Purchasing Management Association of Canada or PMAC).
While I cannot speak for others, over the next few paragraphs I will attempt to provide you with some additional insight into how I approach my work. Hopefully this will at least begin to paint a clearer pricture and perhaps establish a framework for evaluating your current consulting arrangements to enable you to get more from existing relationships.
To begin, one does not have to be in the throes of a disaster to benefit from my area of practice. While demanding situations in which bridging the chasm between an expected outcome and the reality of unrealized results is certainly something for which I am known, it is often my ability to see a problem on the distant horizon and structure the appropriate response that has generated the greatest level of client satisfaction.
What makes what I do unique is that I am unencumbered by a commitment to promote a particular methodology such as SCOR or Six Sigma because it is either trendy or has been recommended by the latest expert.
While I have a great deal of respect for both the insight and determination it takes to develop a “standard,” I realized a long time ago that true expertise is directly related to an ability to recognize, understand and successfully adapt to the changing variables of a dynamic world. In short, what is popular is not always right, and what is right is not always popular. And I firmly believe that an attempt to consign and confine a real-world practice to a set of “universal” standards that fail to recognize the disparate requirements of diverse stakeholders has proven to be folly. An 85% rate of ERP/e-Procurement initiative failure gives testimony to this fact.
It is through this lens of objective assessment in which a pre-ordained outcome has not already been determined that my clients have realized the most significant gains. (Note: In providing me with a reference, a senior industry executive demonstrated my willingness to challenge the veracity of mainstream thinking when he said, “Jon is one of the few professionals who understand what really happens and he will tell you the truth about the process . . . the good, the bad and especially the ugly.”
Please do not misinterpret what I am saying. I am not adverse to a particular idea or standard for the mere sake of being disagreeable. What I am saying is that left unchecked or unchallenged, even the best intentioned concept can and usually does lose touch with the evolving reality of a given situation. Or as Colin Powell put it in one of his better known speeches (and I paraphrase), “one should always seek the advice of experts, but remember that they too may have reached their peak in terms of relevant knowledge.”
And this of course illustrates the inherent dangers of attempting to create a universal standard of operation and broadly applying it across a specific enterprise, let alone an entire industry sector or sectors. One such example of popular thought gone awry is the persistent belief in the merits of vendor rationalization strategies. (Note: refer to my November 27, 2007 article titled The Continuing Dangers of Vendor Rationalization.)
A New Lens
“Jon Hansen is very knowledgeable and articulate on this topic we affectionately call eProcurement, and I believe that he is really one of the few who have been able to truly visualize the multi-faceted aspects of what can make it work.”
Director, eProcurement Bureau of the Commonwealth of Virginia
This as well as other, similar comments mean a great deal to me because they demonstrate my passion for supply chain practice and validate my commitment to provide my clients with a new and unique lens through which they can truly see the dynamics that define and influence their organization’s operations.
From Warehousing and Distribution Planning to the effects of Double Marginalization within a Decentralized Supply Chain and Sustainable Procurement Policy Development, I am both eager and determined to serve you and your organization’s best interests.
The following is just one of the many examples or case references in which my methodologies have produced tangible results sooner and at a significantly lower price than that of a more traditional or contemporary approach.
Client Challenge
A major metropolitan transit authority contract established a target Service Level Agreement (SLA) for service call resolution of 90% same day (on-site 3-hours) to support their critical IT infrastructure.
Solution Methodology
Utilizing a consumption forecast model developed internally (Part Requirement Rate Formula or PRRF) my analyses was able to accurately forecast the frequency of consumption of specific parts for a particular device type based on the current install base.
Once consumption rates were established by device type, a Product Compression Function (PCF), a model which was also developed internally, was employed to substantially reduce the number of inventoried part numbers or SKU’s by approximately 85% without negatively impacting contract performance. (Note: often time inventory levels grow as a result of inefficient sourcing practices versus increased service demand. Instead of focusing on the implementation of a WMS, a great many organizations would benefit from challenging the logic behind the maintenance of current inventory levels.)
This ability to intelligently reduce inventory levels generated significant and unexpected savings for the client as they were able to a) lower their investment in inventory, b) reduce warehousing and associated costs, c) eliminate product variables for their field technicians, d) establish a more proficient life cycle management process, and e) capitalize on volume discount contracts when such a strategy made the most sense.
Once inventory levels were reduced to reflect the realistic requirements of the contract, the remaining product was systematically dispersed utilizing Strategic Stocking Locations (SSL). Through a central application known as the Interactive Parts Ordering System (IPOS), an advanced time zone algorithm was employed to ensure prompt and easy access to the right inventory, from the right location at the right time. This was accomplished through the development of a real-time polling mechanism which, within a matter of seconds, ascertained the SSL site that was best suited to meet the delivery requirements for a specific service call. This same methodology was also used on a national basis to effectively manage the delivery of military-related service products to 35 geographically dispersed bases across Canada.
While the establishment of the SSL sites and the corresponding introduction of the IPOS application enabled the transit authority to surpass the 90% SLA requirement of the contract, challenges with service calls for which the required product had not previously been requested or, for which historic requirements were sporadic remained. In response to this problem, a process was incorporated to both establish and utilize Strategic Geographic Suppliers (SGS). The SGS is a variation of the cluster concept that has historically been employed by manufacturers.
SGS Overview
Here is an actual example from a separate case study of how the SGS process was utilized for procuring products that were not available from inventory.
The end-user client stipulated a 3-hour response time to support a centralized server farm or network located in the heart of New York City. Critical to their day-to-day operations, strict adherence to the 3-hour SLA was contractually required, with corresponding penalties instituted when said levels were not achieved.
When an essential cooling device failed an attempt was made to obtain the product through normally established channels (i.e. channels of distribution in which a traditional model had been referenced). The estimated time of delivery was 2 to 3 days. (Note: see the Model References links at the conclusion of this post to learn more about the differences between traditional models and the emerging models that are redefining supply chain practice.)
While the client had established “company-wide” sources throughout the United States, they had neglected to establish strategic sources within designated “hot zones,” or areas in which the SLA requirement called for a same day or better response/resolution time. (Note: this oversight is usually a by-product of a centrally established, broadly applied vendor rationalization strategy.)
By establishing a regionalized SGS program, the very next time a requirement for a critical component arose, the needed product was located and delivered within the designated 3-hour time period. And at a much lower price than that of the centrally negotiated volume discount contract.
Results
Collectively, these innovative approaches generated tangible results at multiple levels which in turn was reflected in increased end-user satisfaction and quantifiable bottom line savings. Savings it is important to note that were commensurate with finance department standards. (Note: refer to my January 31, 2008 article titled Bridging the Communications Gap between Finance and Purchasing, to understand why the majority of savings claimed by purchasing departments are rarely reflected in company financials.)
A Passion for Service
Once again, the above case reference is indicative of the thought process and methodologies that I employ to identify the unique characteristics of a given situation and then prescribe a course of action that usually exceeds my clients’ expectations. To do this on a consistent basis however, requires a willingness to eschew “standard” or popular theory in favor of creative ideas that are based on sound business principles. To be succinct, thinking outside of the box does not mean taking unnecessary risks. It means having an open mind that is capable of recognizing and adapting to dynamic real-world changes as they occur.
Regarding my consulting fees, they are structured on a sliding scale that is based on the type of project and size of the company that seeks to use my services. Satisfaction is not just guaranteed, it is promised!
“Jon provided a detailed assessment of a proposed business process in a matter of days. His perspective was insightful on a number of levels and I appreciated the depth of his experience and knowledge of best practices.”
Chief Procurement Officer, Multnomah County
In the end you need to fully understand the approach or methodologies that any prospective consultant is using as the basis of the practice expertise. All approaches must be challenged and be able to stand up to the light of tough scrutiny. That is your responsibility to both yourself and your organization.
However, one rule can be applied across the board . . . if any consultant tells you that they are going to make you a better organization run do not walk to the nearest exit.
The fact is that a consultant brings expertise to the table, but it takes you and your people to ultimately walk through the door to improved efficiency. There are no shortcuts nor are there any magic bullets. You have to take ownership and you have to be actively involved. A consultant alone cannot do it for you. They are a valuable resource that when used correctly will inspire you to think outside of the framework with which you are most familiar and most comfortable. And it is in this area where the greatest gains can be identified and collectively achieved.
Model References:
Optimization Modeling and the Modern Supply Chain (A PI Q and A)
Similarity Heuristics, Iterative Methodologies and the Emergence of the Modern Supply Chain
Is Ford’s auto-xchange the “Real Deal
The Number 1 Question Can A Consultant Really Make a Difference - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Over the past few weeks I have received a spate of questions asking (although some readers have already formed an opinion), what role does an outside consultant really play in an organization? Specifically, what do they do and how can they help me?
This is one of those rare instances when I wear the hats of an unbiased and neutral writer as well as a consultant (I write and teach accredited courses for associations such as Purchasing Management Association of Canada or PMAC).
While I cannot speak for others, over the next few paragraphs I will attempt to provide you with some additional insight into how I approach my work. Hopefully this will at least begin to paint a clearer pricture and perhaps establish a framework for evaluating your current consulting arrangements to enable you to get more from existing relationships.
To begin, one does not have to be in the throes of a disaster to benefit from my area of practice. While demanding situations in which bridging the chasm between an expected outcome and the reality of unrealized results is certainly something for which I am known, it is often my ability to see a problem on the distant horizon and structure the appropriate response that has generated the greatest level of client satisfaction.
What makes what I do unique is that I am unencumbered by a commitment to promote a particular methodology such as SCOR or Six Sigma because it is either trendy or has been recommended by the latest expert.
While I have a great deal of respect for both the insight and determination it takes to develop a “standard,” I realized a long time ago that true expertise is directly related to an ability to recognize, understand and successfully adapt to the changing variables of a dynamic world. In short, what is popular is not always right, and what is right is not always popular. And I firmly believe that an attempt to consign and confine a real-world practice to a set of “universal” standards that fail to recognize the disparate requirements of diverse stakeholders has proven to be folly. An 85% rate of ERP/e-Procurement initiative failure gives testimony to this fact.
It is through this lens of objective assessment in which a pre-ordained outcome has not already been determined that my clients have realized the most significant gains. (Note: In providing me with a reference, a senior industry executive demonstrated my willingness to challenge the veracity of mainstream thinking when he said, “Jon is one of the few professionals who understand what really happens and he will tell you the truth about the process . . . the good, the bad and especially the ugly.”
Please do not misinterpret what I am saying. I am not adverse to a particular idea or standard for the mere sake of being disagreeable. What I am saying is that left unchecked or unchallenged, even the best intentioned concept can and usually does lose touch with the evolving reality of a given situation. Or as Colin Powell put it in one of his better known speeches (and I paraphrase), “one should always seek the advice of experts, but remember that they too may have reached their peak in terms of relevant knowledge.”
And this of course illustrates the inherent dangers of attempting to create a universal standard of operation and broadly applying it across a specific enterprise, let alone an entire industry sector or sectors. One such example of popular thought gone awry is the persistent belief in the merits of vendor rationalization strategies. (Note: refer to my November 27, 2007 article titled The Continuing Dangers of Vendor Rationalization.)
A New Lens
“Jon Hansen is very knowledgeable and articulate on this topic we affectionately call eProcurement, and I believe that he is really one of the few who have been able to truly visualize the multi-faceted aspects of what can make it work.”
Director, eProcurement Bureau of the Commonwealth of Virginia
This as well as other, similar comments mean a great deal to me because they demonstrate my passion for supply chain practice and validate my commitment to provide my clients with a new and unique lens through which they can truly see the dynamics that define and influence their organization’s operations.
From Warehousing and Distribution Planning to the effects of Double Marginalization within a Decentralized Supply Chain and Sustainable Procurement Policy Development, I am both eager and determined to serve you and your organization’s best interests.
The following is just one of the many examples or case references in which my methodologies have produced tangible results sooner and at a significantly lower price than that of a more traditional or contemporary approach.
Client Challenge
A major metropolitan transit authority contract established a target Service Level Agreement (SLA) for service call resolution of 90% same day (on-site 3-hours) to support their critical IT infrastructure.
Solution Methodology
Utilizing a consumption forecast model developed internally (Part Requirement Rate Formula or PRRF) my analyses was able to accurately forecast the frequency of consumption of specific parts for a particular device type based on the current install base.
Once consumption rates were established by device type, a Product Compression Function (PCF), a model which was also developed internally, was employed to substantially reduce the number of inventoried part numbers or SKU’s by approximately 85% without negatively impacting contract performance. (Note: often time inventory levels grow as a result of inefficient sourcing practices versus increased service demand. Instead of focusing on the implementation of a WMS, a great many organizations would benefit from challenging the logic behind the maintenance of current inventory levels.)
This ability to intelligently reduce inventory levels generated significant and unexpected savings for the client as they were able to a) lower their investment in inventory, b) reduce warehousing and associated costs, c) eliminate product variables for their field technicians, d) establish a more proficient life cycle management process, and e) capitalize on volume discount contracts when such a strategy made the most sense.
Once inventory levels were reduced to reflect the realistic requirements of the contract, the remaining product was systematically dispersed utilizing Strategic Stocking Locations (SSL). Through a central application known as the Interactive Parts Ordering System (IPOS), an advanced time zone algorithm was employed to ensure prompt and easy access to the right inventory, from the right location at the right time. This was accomplished through the development of a real-time polling mechanism which, within a matter of seconds, ascertained the SSL site that was best suited to meet the delivery requirements for a specific service call. This same methodology was also used on a national basis to effectively manage the delivery of military-related service products to 35 geographically dispersed bases across Canada.
While the establishment of the SSL sites and the corresponding introduction of the IPOS application enabled the transit authority to surpass the 90% SLA requirement of the contract, challenges with service calls for which the required product had not previously been requested or, for which historic requirements were sporadic remained. In response to this problem, a process was incorporated to both establish and utilize Strategic Geographic Suppliers (SGS). The SGS is a variation of the cluster concept that has historically been employed by manufacturers.
SGS Overview
Here is an actual example from a separate case study of how the SGS process was utilized for procuring products that were not available from inventory.
The end-user client stipulated a 3-hour response time to support a centralized server farm or network located in the heart of New York City. Critical to their day-to-day operations, strict adherence to the 3-hour SLA was contractually required, with corresponding penalties instituted when said levels were not achieved.
When an essential cooling device failed an attempt was made to obtain the product through normally established channels (i.e. channels of distribution in which a traditional model had been referenced). The estimated time of delivery was 2 to 3 days. (Note: see the Model References links at the conclusion of this post to learn more about the differences between traditional models and the emerging models that are redefining supply chain practice.)
While the client had established “company-wide” sources throughout the United States, they had neglected to establish strategic sources within designated “hot zones,” or areas in which the SLA requirement called for a same day or better response/resolution time. (Note: this oversight is usually a by-product of a centrally established, broadly applied vendor rationalization strategy.)
By establishing a regionalized SGS program, the very next time a requirement for a critical component arose, the needed product was located and delivered within the designated 3-hour time period. And at a much lower price than that of the centrally negotiated volume discount contract.
Results
Collectively, these innovative approaches generated tangible results at multiple levels which in turn was reflected in increased end-user satisfaction and quantifiable bottom line savings. Savings it is important to note that were commensurate with finance department standards. (Note: refer to my January 31, 2008 article titled Bridging the Communications Gap between Finance and Purchasing, to understand why the majority of savings claimed by purchasing departments are rarely reflected in company financials.)
A Passion for Service
Once again, the above case reference is indicative of the thought process and methodologies that I employ to identify the unique characteristics of a given situation and then prescribe a course of action that usually exceeds my clients’ expectations. To do this on a consistent basis however, requires a willingness to eschew “standard” or popular theory in favor of creative ideas that are based on sound business principles. To be succinct, thinking outside of the box does not mean taking unnecessary risks. It means having an open mind that is capable of recognizing and adapting to dynamic real-world changes as they occur.
Regarding my consulting fees, they are structured on a sliding scale that is based on the type of project and size of the company that seeks to use my services. Satisfaction is not just guaranteed, it is promised!
“Jon provided a detailed assessment of a proposed business process in a matter of days. His perspective was insightful on a number of levels and I appreciated the depth of his experience and knowledge of best practices.”
Chief Procurement Officer, Multnomah County
In the end you need to fully understand the approach or methodologies that any prospective consultant is using as the basis of the practice expertise. All approaches must be challenged and be able to stand up to the light of tough scrutiny. That is your responsibility to both yourself and your organization.
However, one rule can be applied across the board . . . if any consultant tells you that they are going to make you a better organization run do not walk to the nearest exit.
The fact is that a consultant brings expertise to the table, but it takes you and your people to ultimately walk through the door to improved efficiency. There are no shortcuts nor are there any magic bullets. You have to take ownership and you have to be actively involved. A consultant alone cannot do it for you. They are a valuable resource that when used correctly will inspire you to think outside of the framework with which you are most familiar and most comfortable. And it is in this area where the greatest gains can be identified and collectively achieved.
Model References:
Optimization Modeling and the Modern Supply Chain (A PI Q and A)
Similarity Heuristics, Iterative Methodologies and the Emergence of the Modern Supply Chain
Is Ford’s auto-xchange the “Real Deal
The Number 1 Question Can A Consultant Really Make a Difference - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Kim CastleWith nearly two decades in the advertising and design business, with clients like Domino's Pizza, General Motors, Direct TV, Pedigree, Wolfgang Puck, Higher Octave Music, Hollywood Celebrity Products, Disney, and Paramount, as well as thousands of entrepreneurs around the world define, structure, communicate, and position their business for greater profits, BrandU(R) co-creators Kim Castle and W. Vito Montone discovered that entrepreneurs could experience the same power that big brands command for a fraction of the cost with the world's only process-based results-drive Integral approach to business creation. BrandU(R) is helping entrepreneurs grow with the power of extreme clarity from idea...to brand...to market(TM) and helping one million entrepreneurs become successful and whole so that they can make a difference in the world. Are you one of them? If you want to experience clarity all the way to the bank(TM), get started now at http://www.brandu.com. - Visit Kim Castle's Website |
|||
Leanne Hoagland-SmithAre your sales where you want them to be? Will you be one of the few who achieves sales or business success or one of the many who have failed to change? Are you tired of being told you are like everyone else? Then you may find my first book on sales of interest. Be the Red Jacket in the Sea of Gray Suits, The Keys to Unlocking Sales available at Amazon or at http://www.processspecialist.com/red-jacket.htm. This book is a reflection of my no-nonsense approach to improving sales to overall business results. If you are truly committed to making sustainable changes, then I can help you secure a positive return on your investment because I focus on executable solutions not telling you the problems you already know you have. From training to corporate (group) coaching to executive one on one coaching, my approach is to assess, create awareness, build a goal driven action plan and then execute. The bottom line question is "Not do you or your employees know it, but do you or they want to do it?" Please call for a free strategy session at 219.759.5601. - Visit Leanne Hoagland-Smith's Website |
|||
John PowerJohn Power, founder of Biltmore Franchise Consulting, has extensive experience developing and marketing franchises and business opportunities. He has been in and around franchising for over twenty years. From 1980 through 1990 he conceptualized, organized, and developed the American Video Association. He grew AVA to 2,000 national members, before selling the company it 1990. It was later merged into another home video marketing company. From 2000 to 2005 he worked as a contract marketing and human resources consultant to several local and national companies. In 2005 Mr. Power began working as a franchise development consultant on a full-time basis. Since that time he has helped more than three dozen companies initiate and develop their franchising program. He notes that there are many companies interested in developing a franchise program, and who need his specialized assistance. Mr. Power is a “hands-on” franchise consultant. He said, “I am the ‘nuts and bolts’ person who tends to the details for my clients.” Mr. Power holds a B.S. degree with a major in Marketing. See: www.biltmorefranchise.com You may contact Mr. Power at: jpower@biltmorefranchise.co - Visit John Power's Website |
|||
George LudwigGeorge Ludwig is a recognized authority on sales strategy and peak performance psychology. An international speaker, trainer, and corporate consultant, he helps clients like Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Laboratories, Northwestern Mutual, CIGNA, and numerous others improve sales force effectiveness and performance. Though it's George's strategies and processes that help corporations increase productivity and performance, it's his tremendous energy and dynamism that spark the transformation. Again and again, clients remark on his amazing ability to unleash human capacity and inspire men and women to break out of their comfort zones. The result is a whole new type of salesperson. His customized presentations teach achievers to make stunning advances in their lives. From helping salespeople realize cherished dreams to helping corporations exponentially accelerate revenue streams, George Ludwig leaves audiences and individuals empowered, emboldened, and clamoring for more. George is the best-selling author of Power Selling: Seven Strategies for Cracking the Sales Code and Wise Moves: 60 Quick Tips to Improve Your Position in Life & Business. - Visit George Ludwig's Website |
|||
Dianne CramptonDianne Crampton is an executive leadership coach, team culture consultant, author and president of TIGERS Success Series, Inc. Dianne has been helping CEO's and Executives connect their employees to their core values and goals for over 20 years using the trademarked TIGERS team culture process, which stands for trust, interdependence, genuineness, empathy, risk and success. To download a free white paper on behaviors that build strong teams and behaviors that will predictably tear them down go here. Dianne's contribution to the 2010 Pfeiffer Consulting Journal (an imprint of John Wiley and Sons Publishers) entitled TIGERS Hearted Teams is available in November 2009. Her new book TIGERS Among Us: 5 Winning Business Team Cultures And Why, Three Creeks Publishing will release in March 2010. To receive publishing discounts, subscribe to the free TigerTracks Newsletter here. - Visit Dianne Crampton's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jon's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY Easy Product Ideas Coaching System Working with Wisdom Setting Priorities Worksheet |
|
 | ||
 |
Top 50 HR Blogs 2009
Top 50 HR Blogs 2009 | |
 |
Fortune Hunters
CBC Entrepreneur TV | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||