|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Tiger Feeding Frenzy Reminds Me Of Nixon Quote
|
| Guest post by: Jon Hansen |
Article Overview: As I watched the panoply of media descending on the Tiger Woods story like a Saharan dust storm I was immediately reminded of a quote in which Richard Nixon standing before a picture of John F. Kennedy lamented, "when people look at you they see what they want to be . . . when they look at me they see what they are."
![]() |
Free Download - Is supplier incumbency a major problem with government contracting? By Jon Hansen |
Tiger Feeding Frenzy Reminds Me Of Nixon Quote
As I watched the panoply of media descending on the Tiger Woods
story like a Saharan dust storm I was immediately reminded of a quote
in which Richard Nixon standing before a picture of John F. Kennedy
lamented, "when people look at you they see what they want to be . . .
when they look at me they see what they are."
I am not certain if this totally explains the duality of our
seemingly insatiable appetite for stories of both herculean success and
tawdry failure, but it does seem to reflect why we cheer for the
underdog and applaud the decline of the mighty.
Having occupied the upper echelons of our societal scale between
adulation and contempt, Woods has never been exposed to the downside of
our imposed JFK-type expectations. It is in this shaded area of human
fallibility where our "disappointment" and chagrin of being let down by
yet another icon intermingles with our almost life-affirming
satisfaction that Tiger is just one of us. What's the old saying about
trying to save a drowning man?
From an icon's perspective, playing to the ephemeral shifting sands
of public sentiment as we discovered in a two-part segment on
leadership on the PI Window on Business this past June, is tantamount
to trying to hit the proverbial moving target. In other words it is a
no win scenario. This leads to an important question, does success and
the corresponding access it provides entitle the public to judge the
conduct of those we have deemed worthy of our praise by a different
standard of measure? Of even greater interest is whether said standard
of measurement is in reality based on a deeply rooted jealousy that
simmers beneath the surface of our character in the form of why them
and not me?
Think about it for a moment in the quiet and safe confines of our
everyday lives. Something that isn't available to Tiger Woods at the
moment.
Isn't there even just a slight possibility that we expect more of
our self-appointed "icons" because we somehow feel that they have been
given special gifts that we ourselves have been denied? In a way a
sort of "punishment" that places an unrealistic, bigger-than-life
burden upon them because they may excel in an area in which their
rewards in a kind of twisted irony, are ultimately ones that we choose
to bestow upon them? After all, if Woods' "personal brand" was the
same as Bob the baker or Harry the shoemaker, the competition prize
money and endorsements that have made him a millionaire many times over
would not be an issue.
In line with the scriptures "Let he who is without sin cast the
first stone," I do not believe that Woods should be held to a higher
standard than the rest of us. In short, we the public are wrong to
impose a different set of rules on anyone regardless of accomplishment
or wealth.
Where Woods, as well as most people who live in celebrity's bright
light fall is when they align their self-image with the false standards
of our artificial scale. This of course is the area in which the
arrogance to which the media has been referring exists and with it the
absence of belief in one's own fallibility and vulnerability. In other
words, Woods has bought into his own press clippings that has somehow
obfuscated the fact that to both the public and himself, he is human.
No more and no less.
So the question still remains, who is responsible and what is the next step?
Simply put, both the public and Woods are responsible for the skewed lens through which both we and he viewed his life.
We are responsible for creating a separate (and not necessarily
even-handed) standard by which we have held him accountable. He is
responsible for taking the bait of believing in his own omnipotence.
As for the next step, all parties should retire to their respective
corners and take a good long look in the mirror and realize that our
personal brands are mere flesh and bone in which perfection is an
elusive mirage of unrealistic expectation. Perhaps then we will find
the necessary equilibrium to applaud success without adoring it.
Article Tags: adulation, chagrin, confines, contempt, downside, drowning man, duality, everyday lives, human fallibility, insatiable appetite, john f kennedy, moving target, panoply, public sentiment, richard nixon, saharan dust storm, shifting sands, standard of measurement, tiger woods story, upper echelons
|
About the Author: Jon Hansen RSS for Jon's articles - Visit Jon's website Personal Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jwhansen Click here to visit Jon's website The Greening of Procurement Part 1 In the Year 2020 Workforce Technologys Diminishing Role in an Emerging ProcessDriven World Part 1 Six Sigma Relevancy Question and Kotters Theory of Transformation Double Marginalization and the Point of Ideal Price Viability |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Improve E-mail: Avoid the Quicksand
Presenting Yourself With Impact at Work
Resistance to Change and How to Deal With It
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



