Warehouse Intelligence Versus Warehouse Management The Baxter Advantage Baxter Planning Systems Profile
Warehouse Intelligence Versus Warehouse Management The Baxter Advantage Baxter Planning Systems Profile
“What is the best equation to prepare a costing for spare parts in an electronic repair center?”
Baxter Answer (Mark Anderson, Vice President, Supply Chain Solutions):
“I think we would need more precise information about your environment to offer specific pricing equations, so I’ll use this opportunity to talk in general about service parts.
There are unique characteristics to service parts to be considered. First, there are the large number of parts (generally) that you will need to perform repair. There is also a unique pattern to demand of these items. In Pricing, consideration should be given to the criticaity of each part and the part’s lifecycle (new, growing, mature, phasing out, discontinued). Of course, pricing of your competitors is also a consideration.
It’s common for service pricing to use cost-plus models. These are simple and straight-forward, using the cost to manufacture or purchase the part and applying a standard mark-up. More organizations are recognizing that adding demand information for service parts is a valuable strategy. Also, more are segmenting parts, not based on ABC, but on groups tied to life cycle and competitive pricing. Demand information is used to analyze the affect of sales volume due to potential pricing changes. They determine the best pricing to apply to each part grouping.
In the end, you must be competitive and profitable and correct pricing can be a big part of that. Also, planning for the right number of spare parts has a direct impact on your profitability as you invest spares. Planning tools to aid in the optimization of inventory and service level are paramount to a successful service strategy.”
From a Q&A exchange on LinkedIn – August 2008 (Note: the link to the Baxter answer in its entirety has been provided in the Web Resources Section at the conclusion of this post)
Something that I have learnt over the many years I have been a writer is that the interaction between a vendor and a prospect or client is far more revealing than an interview. Unencumbered by concerns as to how the interview will translate into print, the vendor – prospect interaction is unguarded and expansive in terms of disseminating critical information about the product or service being offered. For this reason, Mark Anderson’s response to the question, “What is the best equation to prepare a costing for spare parts in an electronic repair center,” was both informative as well as telling.
Over the years I have dedicated a good portion of my research energies on the vagaries of Maintenance, Repair, Operations (MRO) commodities, including their procurement and management. In fact one of the first papers I wrote that achieved critical acclaim centered on the fact that MRO products consistently demonstrated a Dynamic Flux Commodity Characteristic versus the more pedestrian characteristics of Direct Material commodities. The identification of Commodity Characteristics was an important breakthrough in that it directly impacts the way in which organizations such as service companies structure their client programs. (Note: to obtain a copy of the White Paper “Acres of Diamonds: The Value of Effectively Managing Low-Dollar, High Transactional Volume Spend” send me an e-mail at jwhansen@sympatico.ca, with “ACRES” in the subject line.)
As a result of my research, Anderson’s response resonated with me perhaps more so than Q&A’s involving other areas of supply chain practice because it did not seek to “champion” a technological approach to what can be a complex environment. In fact, and unless you had noted his title and company’s name in the profile box, one would be hard pressed to even identify Anderson as being in the “software business.” And it is this seemingly innocuous observation that is at the heart of the Baxter solution.
Proactive Understanding
In the previous post, I posed the question “Are you in the software business?” As indicated, the basis for the question was the result of a conversation I had with a senior level executive who lamented the fact that she had to dedicate two full-time staff to the “ongoing” implementation of a PeopleSoft procurement module.
Of the myriad of problems encountered by organizations who pursue a technological solution as a means of filling their operational gaps, the risk of being defined by the chosen application is most prevelant. Specifically, being pigeonholed into a pre-determined course that is governed by a cost justification imperative versus a process improvement resolution.
While Baxter Planning System’s financial success is driven by “selling” their applications, the solutions they provide are an extension of an in depth industry knowledge and understanding. In short, they lead with insight and deliver tangible value versus leading with technology and justifying fees through analytical mumbo-jumbo (I think mumbo-jumbo is a word?).
This is an important distinction, especially when one recognizes the inherent flaws with the traditional “belt with suspenders” mindset that has historically governed warehousing strategies.
More Than 90%
I cannot help but recall a meeting I had with a large electronic retailer based in Minneapolis who proudly proclaimed that they had rationalized the supply base down to 100 vendors, and satisfied 90% of their service calls through their warehouse.
Without going into too much detail, a simple analysis of a single MRO commodity (supported of course by extensive case reference history) showed that they were paying a premium of 23% over the going market price for the service part in question. In effect, their perception of reality was dangerously skewed by the self-imposed confines of a strategy that took them further away from being able to make an accurate assessment of real-world performance. Or as I tell my audiences in the many seminars I give, they unintentionally narrowed the scope of their experience (re data capture) as part of their rationalization strategy to the point that they based their performance measurements on an internal, increasingly narrow point of reference.
In this scenario, does it make sense to lead with a warehouse management technology, or would it make more sense to proactively attempt to discern their current strategy’s impact on critical areas of the business including both financial as well as Service Level Agreement (SLA) performance?
A software company would lead with technology. An intelligence resource and business partner would not. Baxter is not a software company!
Why Baxter?
For those of you who are part of my reagular readership, you already know that an important tenet of the Procurement Insights Sponsorship Program (which includes these profiles) is my total commitment to neutrality. In assessing the viability of the Baxter value proposition, it will be up to you to determine how they may be of service to your organization. And as is the case with all sponsors, I will direct you to the Link To Our Sponsors section of the PI Blog to investigate their value proposition in greater detail, and at your own convenience. (Note: as I have run out of ways to state my commitment to neutrality, I have decided to use the above standard “template” in this as well as all future posts. My apologies for foregoing originality in place of convenience.)
In the end, Baxter Planning Systems places a greater emphasis on the “Planning” versus “Systems” aspect of their name. This is not to imply that their technological offering is in some way a secondary consideration. In fact, the opposite is true in that the veracity of the Baxter solution is inextricably linked to their “intelligence” first approach.
And it is through this clarifying lens that the unique operating attributes of your organization will be thoughtfully viewed and successfully addressed.
Web Resources: Visit the Author Profile to obtain Jon Hansen's e-mail to request corresponding reference material.
Warehouse Intelligence Versus Warehouse Management The Baxter Advantage Baxter Planning Systems Profile - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Network Member Question:
“What is the best equation to prepare a costing for spare parts in an electronic repair center?”
Baxter Answer (Mark Anderson, Vice President, Supply Chain Solutions):
“I think we would need more precise information about your environment to offer specific pricing equations, so I’ll use this opportunity to talk in general about service parts.
There are unique characteristics to service parts to be considered. First, there are the large number of parts (generally) that you will need to perform repair. There is also a unique pattern to demand of these items. In Pricing, consideration should be given to the criticaity of each part and the part’s lifecycle (new, growing, mature, phasing out, discontinued). Of course, pricing of your competitors is also a consideration.
It’s common for service pricing to use cost-plus models. These are simple and straight-forward, using the cost to manufacture or purchase the part and applying a standard mark-up. More organizations are recognizing that adding demand information for service parts is a valuable strategy. Also, more are segmenting parts, not based on ABC, but on groups tied to life cycle and competitive pricing. Demand information is used to analyze the affect of sales volume due to potential pricing changes. They determine the best pricing to apply to each part grouping.
In the end, you must be competitive and profitable and correct pricing can be a big part of that. Also, planning for the right number of spare parts has a direct impact on your profitability as you invest spares. Planning tools to aid in the optimization of inventory and service level are paramount to a successful service strategy.”
From a Q&A exchange on LinkedIn – August 2008 (Note: the link to the Baxter answer in its entirety has been provided in the Web Resources Section at the conclusion of this post)
Something that I have learnt over the many years I have been a writer is that the interaction between a vendor and a prospect or client is far more revealing than an interview. Unencumbered by concerns as to how the interview will translate into print, the vendor – prospect interaction is unguarded and expansive in terms of disseminating critical information about the product or service being offered. For this reason, Mark Anderson’s response to the question, “What is the best equation to prepare a costing for spare parts in an electronic repair center,” was both informative as well as telling.
Over the years I have dedicated a good portion of my research energies on the vagaries of Maintenance, Repair, Operations (MRO) commodities, including their procurement and management. In fact one of the first papers I wrote that achieved critical acclaim centered on the fact that MRO products consistently demonstrated a Dynamic Flux Commodity Characteristic versus the more pedestrian characteristics of Direct Material commodities. The identification of Commodity Characteristics was an important breakthrough in that it directly impacts the way in which organizations such as service companies structure their client programs. (Note: to obtain a copy of the White Paper “Acres of Diamonds: The Value of Effectively Managing Low-Dollar, High Transactional Volume Spend” send me an e-mail at jwhansen@sympatico.ca, with “ACRES” in the subject line.)
As a result of my research, Anderson’s response resonated with me perhaps more so than Q&A’s involving other areas of supply chain practice because it did not seek to “champion” a technological approach to what can be a complex environment. In fact, and unless you had noted his title and company’s name in the profile box, one would be hard pressed to even identify Anderson as being in the “software business.” And it is this seemingly innocuous observation that is at the heart of the Baxter solution.
Proactive Understanding
In the previous post, I posed the question “Are you in the software business?” As indicated, the basis for the question was the result of a conversation I had with a senior level executive who lamented the fact that she had to dedicate two full-time staff to the “ongoing” implementation of a PeopleSoft procurement module.
Of the myriad of problems encountered by organizations who pursue a technological solution as a means of filling their operational gaps, the risk of being defined by the chosen application is most prevelant. Specifically, being pigeonholed into a pre-determined course that is governed by a cost justification imperative versus a process improvement resolution.
While Baxter Planning System’s financial success is driven by “selling” their applications, the solutions they provide are an extension of an in depth industry knowledge and understanding. In short, they lead with insight and deliver tangible value versus leading with technology and justifying fees through analytical mumbo-jumbo (I think mumbo-jumbo is a word?).
This is an important distinction, especially when one recognizes the inherent flaws with the traditional “belt with suspenders” mindset that has historically governed warehousing strategies.
More Than 90%
I cannot help but recall a meeting I had with a large electronic retailer based in Minneapolis who proudly proclaimed that they had rationalized the supply base down to 100 vendors, and satisfied 90% of their service calls through their warehouse.
Without going into too much detail, a simple analysis of a single MRO commodity (supported of course by extensive case reference history) showed that they were paying a premium of 23% over the going market price for the service part in question. In effect, their perception of reality was dangerously skewed by the self-imposed confines of a strategy that took them further away from being able to make an accurate assessment of real-world performance. Or as I tell my audiences in the many seminars I give, they unintentionally narrowed the scope of their experience (re data capture) as part of their rationalization strategy to the point that they based their performance measurements on an internal, increasingly narrow point of reference.
In this scenario, does it make sense to lead with a warehouse management technology, or would it make more sense to proactively attempt to discern their current strategy’s impact on critical areas of the business including both financial as well as Service Level Agreement (SLA) performance?
A software company would lead with technology. An intelligence resource and business partner would not. Baxter is not a software company!
Why Baxter?
For those of you who are part of my reagular readership, you already know that an important tenet of the Procurement Insights Sponsorship Program (which includes these profiles) is my total commitment to neutrality. In assessing the viability of the Baxter value proposition, it will be up to you to determine how they may be of service to your organization. And as is the case with all sponsors, I will direct you to the Link To Our Sponsors section of the PI Blog to investigate their value proposition in greater detail, and at your own convenience. (Note: as I have run out of ways to state my commitment to neutrality, I have decided to use the above standard “template” in this as well as all future posts. My apologies for foregoing originality in place of convenience.)
In the end, Baxter Planning Systems places a greater emphasis on the “Planning” versus “Systems” aspect of their name. This is not to imply that their technological offering is in some way a secondary consideration. In fact, the opposite is true in that the veracity of the Baxter solution is inextricably linked to their “intelligence” first approach.
And it is through this clarifying lens that the unique operating attributes of your organization will be thoughtfully viewed and successfully addressed.
Web Resources: Visit the Author Profile to obtain Jon Hansen's e-mail to request corresponding reference material.
Warehouse Intelligence Versus Warehouse Management The Baxter Advantage Baxter Planning Systems Profile - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Joe DagerJoe Dager is President of Business901, a progressive coaching company providing no-nonsense direction in areas such as Lean Six Sigma Marketing and organized referral marketing. What others say: In the past 20 years, Joe and I have collaborated on many difficult issues. Joe’s ability to combine his expertise with “out of the box” thinking is unsurpassed. He has always delivered quickly, cost effectively and with ingenuity. A brilliant mind that is always a pleasure to work with.” - James R. If you want to learn more about Business901, start a conversation with us. We can be found @ Web/Blog: Business901.com Web/Blog: FundingYourNonprofit.com LinkedIn Profile Follow me on Twitter - Visit Joe Dager's Website |
|||
David AchesonDavid Acheson is the founder of DCJA Consultancy. DCJA Consultancy is a management consultancy business specialising in B2B sales consultancy. They offer bespoke and packaged sales consultancy including Sales Optimisation Review, Interim Sales Management, Sales & Marketing Review, 1:1 Sales & Management Staff Analysis, Management Training, Solution Sales Training, Creation of New Pay Plan, KPI's, run Customer Feedback Campaigns, assist with Recruitment, Coaching, Appraisals and set up Strategic Marketing Campaigns. David spent his early career in accountancy and then moved into sales in 1982, working in Office Equipment, IT, Advertising, Training, Outsourcing and Consultancy. He has held many Senior Positions in SMBs and Global Organisations including Head of Sales Operations & Head of Business Development. His knowledge, skills and great experience of the Sales Industry has led to David making keynote speeches and running educational sessions to key businesses through organisations including The Chamber of Commerce and Business Link. - Visit David Acheson's Website |
|||
Dave KurlanDave Kurlan is the founder and CEO of Objective Management Group, Inc., the industry leader in sales assessments and sales force evaluations, and the CEO of David Kurlan & Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in sales force development. Dave has been a top rated speaker at Inc. Magazine's Conference on Growing the Company, the Sales & Marketing Management Conference and the Gazelles Sales & Marketing Summit. He has been featured on radio and TV, including World Business Review with General Norman Schwarzkopf, in Inc. Magazine, Selling Power Magazine, Sales & Marketing Management Magazine and Incentive Magazine. He is the author of Mindless Selling and Baseline Selling – How to Become a Sales Superstar by Using What You Already Know about the Game of Baseball. He created and wrote STAR, a proprietary recruiting process for hiring great salespeople, and he writes Understanding the Sales Force, a popular business Blog and is a contributing author to The Death of 20th Century Selling and 101 Great Ways to Improve Your Life, Volume 2. - Visit Dave Kurlan's Website |
|||
Linda RichardsonLinda Richardson is the Founder and Executive Chairwoman of Richardson, a global sales training and performance improvement company. As a recognized leader in the industry, she has won the coveted Stevie Award for Lifetime Achievement in Sales Excellence and she was identified by Training Industry, Inc. as one of the “Top 20 Most Influential Training Professionals.” Ms. Richardson is credited with the movement to Consultative Selling and is the author of ten books on selling and sales management, including Sales Coaching — Making the Great Leap from Sales Manager to Sales Coach, and Stop Telling, Start Selling. She teaches sales and management at the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania and the Wharton Executive Development Center. Linda is a frequent speaker at industry and client conferences, has been published extensively in industry and training journals, and has been featured in numerous publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Nation’s Business, Selling Power, Success, and The Conference Board Magazine. Learn more about Richardson's sales training and performance improvement solutions at http://www.richardson.com web - Visit Linda Richardson's Website |
|||
Stephanie RobeyStephanie Robey is President and CoFounder of Pivot Positive, LLC - an Internet marketing business focused on helping people start work at home ventures. Previously, she was employed at The Search Agency with over 20 years experience in graphic design and 10 years experience in online marketing. She was responsible for launching the Conversion Path Optimization (CPO) unit where she and her team have conducted hundreds of optimization tests for online companies across multiple verticals. She is a successful entrepreneur having started and sold 2 companies and remains on the board of directors of the third, PhotoSpin.com Stephanie began her career in the direct marketing realm creating and producing direct mail for many of the major cable television companies and directly attributes her understanding of Internet marketing to those early offline experiences. Stephanie is a graduate of San Diego State University with a BFA in Graphic Arts and also holds an Executive MBA from the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University. Read Steph's Blog Meet Steph and Dave Sign up for our Free 7-Day BootCamp: Self Employed & Rich - Visit Stephanie Robey's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jon's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
 |
 Think Networking Power of Concentration Valley of Death Eneterprise Readiness Residual Income |
|
 | ||
 |
Email The Reporters
Press Release Builder | |
 |
Write The PR
Press Release Builder | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||