While We Were Sleeping: A Story of Misdirected Efforts in the World of Public Sector Procurement Policy
While We Were Sleeping: A Story of Misdirected Efforts in the World of Public Sector Procurement Policy
Despite the numerous “outward facing” storylines that can be pursued in terms of GoC activity, the real action (or lack thereof) is actually within the supplier community itself.
I am of course referring to the ongoing inability of associations and lobbying groups to respond to government policy outside of the confines of a narrowly defined platform. A platform I would add in which the tempo is being set by the government.
As a point of illustration, let’s consider the concern that the Task-Based IT Professional Services (TBIPS) Strategy will be superseded by a “couple of winner take all contracts awarded to very large multi-nationals.”
In a June 6th, 2006 meeting hosted by PWGSC, Mike Appleton, FCMC (representing the CMC Association’s Ad Hoc Committee for Government-wide Procurement) raised a number of concerns on this very same subject.
The association reported that PWGSC’s Jerome Thauvette, Director of the Informatics Procurement Directorate, responded with a “revised” TBIPS Strategy document. The report went on to say that within the text of the “revised” document, PWGSC had “given in on several areas as a result of the Association’s intervention and the intervention of several other associations including ITAC, CabiNET, CATA, etc.”
The concluding notes from the meeting indicated that while the “Committee feels that the revised strategy is not yet perfect,” the general consensus is that it “does present a much more reasonable approach.”
All I can say is that there must have been some further “revisional” developments that strayed from the expected path, because here we are close to 2 years later and the issue is far from being addressed let alone understood and resolved.
The fact is that the supplier community as a whole and the associations that represent them are too focused on the GoC’s practice of dangling shiny papers. In essence look at the pretty lights over here, while the “real work” (nee agenda) is moving forward someplace else.
What is really needed is a change in tempo. And I am not talking about the issuance of yet another association “position paper”, or an expeditionary effort such as the one associated with a May 9th, 2006 undertaking titled “Partner or Perish: Prosperity, Global Supply Chains and the Role of Government Procurement.” While I do not take issue with the contents of these types of documents themselves, it is their ultimate inability to affect true and lasting change that is most troubling.
Or to take an excerpt from one of my most recent white papers (SAP Procurement for Public Sector):
“Albert Einstein once defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. While mildly amusing, it is nonetheless a thought provoking statement when applied to the evolution of the enterprise software industry and in particular the introduction of supply chain/e-procurement solutions.”
In the case of the ongoing GoC saga, in which countless meetings, roundtables and papers have been leveraged to bridge the disconnect between government procurement policy and its supply base, one cannot help but think about the old saying, “when everything is said and done, there is more said than done!”
Collectively, at least from the supplier perspective, we are no further ahead. Therefore, in situations such as these, you have to change the rules of engagement.
In a recent discussion I had with an industry veteran, it was suggested that the government will continue to do everything possible to work on the periphery of the issues versus participating in a direct debate where hard evidence and facts are presented and intelligently discussed.
A forum if you will, that resembles the Democratic debates that are now taking place south of the border.
This format will not only table the issues but will also “stimulate” (I am reluctant to use the word force here, but you get my drift) tangible responses from senior bureaucrats such as the Chuck Henry’s or Steven Poole’s, rather than the sacrificial government lambs who have participated in previous “dialogues.”
Don’t misunderstand me I am not suggesting that a forum be used as a vehicle to attack the soundness of a shared services strategy itself. Based on experience this approach certainly merits consideration under the right set of circumstances.
However, the government’s reluctance to expose the program to the light of informed scrutiny undermines their overall creditability in that there is an assumption that the shared services strategy will be broadly applied (to the detriment of most stakeholders) across the entire enterprise. An assumption that is hopefully wrong as the broad application of any strategy forces the practice to fit the program versus the program fitting the practice. Historically, this has resulted in an exceedingly high rate of initiative failures. Failures, I might add that have been well documented.
And herein rests the probative value of an open forum in that an honest debate of the facts will lay the foundation for true understanding. And understanding of course is ultimately the key to sustainable success. As I had opined in a recent post titled Supply Chain Confidence? (http://procureinsights.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/supply-chain-confidence-a-pi-q-and-a/), “effective communication leads to understanding. Understanding of diverse stakeholder interests and objectives in turn leads to the development of a shared vision from which confidence is a natural progression.”
Right now, there is a serious lack of confidence on the part of important stakeholders both within and external to the government. Laying the proverbial cards on the table for all to see is the first and most important step to ending the endless volley of what now appears to be empty platitudes leading to the same dead end results.
Unless it is the government’s intention to wear down the supply base through an attrition of interest, there should be no reason for them to avoid this opportunity to communicate with an informed and certainly interested supplier constituency.
While We Were Sleeping A Story of Misdirected Efforts in the World of Public Sector Procurement Policy - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
It has been one of the more interesting weeks in the world of Government of Canada procurement policy-making.
Despite the numerous “outward facing” storylines that can be pursued in terms of GoC activity, the real action (or lack thereof) is actually within the supplier community itself.
I am of course referring to the ongoing inability of associations and lobbying groups to respond to government policy outside of the confines of a narrowly defined platform. A platform I would add in which the tempo is being set by the government.
As a point of illustration, let’s consider the concern that the Task-Based IT Professional Services (TBIPS) Strategy will be superseded by a “couple of winner take all contracts awarded to very large multi-nationals.”
In a June 6th, 2006 meeting hosted by PWGSC, Mike Appleton, FCMC (representing the CMC Association’s Ad Hoc Committee for Government-wide Procurement) raised a number of concerns on this very same subject.
The association reported that PWGSC’s Jerome Thauvette, Director of the Informatics Procurement Directorate, responded with a “revised” TBIPS Strategy document. The report went on to say that within the text of the “revised” document, PWGSC had “given in on several areas as a result of the Association’s intervention and the intervention of several other associations including ITAC, CabiNET, CATA, etc.”
The concluding notes from the meeting indicated that while the “Committee feels that the revised strategy is not yet perfect,” the general consensus is that it “does present a much more reasonable approach.”
All I can say is that there must have been some further “revisional” developments that strayed from the expected path, because here we are close to 2 years later and the issue is far from being addressed let alone understood and resolved.
The fact is that the supplier community as a whole and the associations that represent them are too focused on the GoC’s practice of dangling shiny papers. In essence look at the pretty lights over here, while the “real work” (nee agenda) is moving forward someplace else.
What is really needed is a change in tempo. And I am not talking about the issuance of yet another association “position paper”, or an expeditionary effort such as the one associated with a May 9th, 2006 undertaking titled “Partner or Perish: Prosperity, Global Supply Chains and the Role of Government Procurement.” While I do not take issue with the contents of these types of documents themselves, it is their ultimate inability to affect true and lasting change that is most troubling.
Or to take an excerpt from one of my most recent white papers (SAP Procurement for Public Sector):
“Albert Einstein once defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. While mildly amusing, it is nonetheless a thought provoking statement when applied to the evolution of the enterprise software industry and in particular the introduction of supply chain/e-procurement solutions.”
In the case of the ongoing GoC saga, in which countless meetings, roundtables and papers have been leveraged to bridge the disconnect between government procurement policy and its supply base, one cannot help but think about the old saying, “when everything is said and done, there is more said than done!”
Collectively, at least from the supplier perspective, we are no further ahead. Therefore, in situations such as these, you have to change the rules of engagement.
In a recent discussion I had with an industry veteran, it was suggested that the government will continue to do everything possible to work on the periphery of the issues versus participating in a direct debate where hard evidence and facts are presented and intelligently discussed.
A forum if you will, that resembles the Democratic debates that are now taking place south of the border.
This format will not only table the issues but will also “stimulate” (I am reluctant to use the word force here, but you get my drift) tangible responses from senior bureaucrats such as the Chuck Henry’s or Steven Poole’s, rather than the sacrificial government lambs who have participated in previous “dialogues.”
Don’t misunderstand me I am not suggesting that a forum be used as a vehicle to attack the soundness of a shared services strategy itself. Based on experience this approach certainly merits consideration under the right set of circumstances.
However, the government’s reluctance to expose the program to the light of informed scrutiny undermines their overall creditability in that there is an assumption that the shared services strategy will be broadly applied (to the detriment of most stakeholders) across the entire enterprise. An assumption that is hopefully wrong as the broad application of any strategy forces the practice to fit the program versus the program fitting the practice. Historically, this has resulted in an exceedingly high rate of initiative failures. Failures, I might add that have been well documented.
And herein rests the probative value of an open forum in that an honest debate of the facts will lay the foundation for true understanding. And understanding of course is ultimately the key to sustainable success. As I had opined in a recent post titled Supply Chain Confidence? (http://procureinsights.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/supply-chain-confidence-a-pi-q-and-a/), “effective communication leads to understanding. Understanding of diverse stakeholder interests and objectives in turn leads to the development of a shared vision from which confidence is a natural progression.”
Right now, there is a serious lack of confidence on the part of important stakeholders both within and external to the government. Laying the proverbial cards on the table for all to see is the first and most important step to ending the endless volley of what now appears to be empty platitudes leading to the same dead end results.
Unless it is the government’s intention to wear down the supply base through an attrition of interest, there should be no reason for them to avoid this opportunity to communicate with an informed and certainly interested supplier constituency.
While We Were Sleeping A Story of Misdirected Efforts in the World of Public Sector Procurement Policy - To learn more about this author, visit Jon Hansen's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Kim CastleWith nearly two decades in the advertising and design business, with clients like Domino's Pizza, General Motors, Direct TV, Pedigree, Wolfgang Puck, Higher Octave Music, Hollywood Celebrity Products, Disney, and Paramount, as well as thousands of entrepreneurs around the world define, structure, communicate, and position their business for greater profits, BrandU(R) co-creators Kim Castle and W. Vito Montone discovered that entrepreneurs could experience the same power that big brands command for a fraction of the cost with the world's only process-based results-drive Integral approach to business creation. BrandU(R) is helping entrepreneurs grow with the power of extreme clarity from idea...to brand...to market(TM) and helping one million entrepreneurs become successful and whole so that they can make a difference in the world. Are you one of them? If you want to experience clarity all the way to the bank(TM), get started now at http://www.brandu.com. - Visit Kim Castle's Website |
|||
John AlexanderJohn has taught keyword research and SEO skills to small groups of business owners and Webmasters from over 80 different countries world wide since 2002. John is also the Director of Search Engine Academy ; Co-director of Training at Search Engine Workshops offering live, SEO Workshops with his partner SEO educator Robin Nobles, author of the very first comprehensive online search engine marketing courses at SEO Training Online and the SEO Workshop Resource Center. I look forward to hearing from you! - Visit John Alexander's Website |
|||
Dave KurlanDave Kurlan is the founder and CEO of Objective Management Group, Inc., the industry leader in sales assessments and sales force evaluations, and the CEO of David Kurlan & Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in sales force development. Dave has been a top rated speaker at Inc. Magazine's Conference on Growing the Company, the Sales & Marketing Management Conference and the Gazelles Sales & Marketing Summit. He has been featured on radio and TV, including World Business Review with General Norman Schwarzkopf, in Inc. Magazine, Selling Power Magazine, Sales & Marketing Management Magazine and Incentive Magazine. He is the author of Mindless Selling and Baseline Selling – How to Become a Sales Superstar by Using What You Already Know about the Game of Baseball. He created and wrote STAR, a proprietary recruiting process for hiring great salespeople, and he writes Understanding the Sales Force, a popular business Blog and is a contributing author to The Death of 20th Century Selling and 101 Great Ways to Improve Your Life, Volume 2. - Visit Dave Kurlan's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jon's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
|
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Making SEO Decisions Start Right FREE Realestate CSS Template Law of Attraction Future Networking |
|
 | ||
 |
The Top 10 Guy Kawasaki Posts
Best Posts for Entrepreneurs | |
 |
Top 50 Marketing Blogs
Top Marketing Blogs of 2010 | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||