Tweet

Protecting Their Property

Written by: Lynn Celmer

Article Overview: Minimize your risk of an intellectual property lawsuit by covering all your bases.

Protecting Their Property

In a humorous knock at our sometimes overly litigious society, Coca-Cola launched an ad campaign where two actors playing representatives from Coca-Cola talk to real lawyers about the possibility of suing Coca-Cola Zero for taste infringement—the joke being that Coca-Cola and Coca-Cola Zero are produced by the same company, hence they would be suing themselves.
Unfortunately, in the real world, there is nothing funny about a small business getting hit with an intellectual property lawsuit. Intellectual property encompasses copyright, patent, trademark trade dress (the physical appearance of a product), and trade secret issues. Under intellectual property law, the holder of one of these abstract "properties" has certain exclusive rights to the creative work, symbol or invention that is covered by it.
Recent legislation has made it even easier for big corporations to sue smaller businesses over trademark dilution. The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 allows for brand owners to show only a "likelihood of dilution," rather than having to demonstrate that their mark has suffered "actual dilution." This basically means that big companies with famous trademarks can now sue businesses with even the slightest similarity to their name.
Dog lovers around the world watched as luxury powerhouse Louis Vuitton took on Haute Diggity Dog, a small Las Vegas pet product business in a real life David vs. Goliath battle. Louis Vuitton sued Haute Diggity Dog, its principal owner Victoria Dauernheim and retailer Woofie's Pet Boutique in Ashburn, Virginia, in 2006, claiming their "Chewy Vuiton" dog toys violated trademark, trade dress and copyright infringement laws. The toys are shaped like the famous handbag and featured an interlocking CV logo in place of the trademarked LV logo.
Judge Paul V. Niemeyer ruled that although the toys bear a resemblance to the famed Parisian handbags, it is unlikely that consumers would be confused into thinking the toys were made by the luxury retailer. "The juxtaposition of the similar and dissimilar—the irreverent representation and the idealized image of an LVM handbag—immediately conveys a joking and amusing parody," Niemeyer wrote. "The funny little 'Chewy Vuiton' imitation, as something to be chewed by a dog, pokes fun at the elegance and expensiveness of a Louis Vuitton handbag, which must not be chewed by a dog."
Although they won their case, Haute Diggity Dog has yet to recover financially, as the case ended up costing the tiny three-person company over $200,000 in legal fees. "We still haven't been able to recover as of yet, because we haven't been able to spend all of the money that we usually do on products and marketing, going to trade shows and getting new stuff out there," Dauernheim said.
In order to avoid the possibility of a lawsuit, it is advisable that small business owners, with the exception of the exceedingly local business that's reputation based, such as a plumber of contractor, do some trademark research, according to intellectual property attorney and blogger Martin Schwimmer. "A recurring misconception that most corporate lawyers are aware of is that availability for use of a corporate name is not the same thing as availability for use as a trademark," he said.
Schwimmer continued, "Let's say that I am starting a small business and tell my lawyer that I want to be Marty, Inc. in New York and they tell me that Marty, Inc. is taken. But, I can be Marty, Inc. Group or Marty Ltd, because the state is only interested in the name. They don't look to see if there is a Marty, Inc. in California or a Marty, Inc. in Missouri and that is important information if I am going to incorporate and sell my goods nationwide." He added, "You also don't want to take investors' money and two days after launch you receive a demand letter requiring you to repackage because you didn't spend several hundred dollars on a trademark search."
Although Schwimmer doesn't recommend it, for the startup business that is completely cash strapped, they can go to the trademark office website or Google and try their best to determine whether a business name is available. "This is one of those things where expertise makes the difference," he added.
Also be aware of overlapping intellectual property protections. This means that a product might be protectable under trade secrets, trademark, copyright and patent. However, there are certain things that have been defined to be not complimentary. An example of that would be a patent and a trademark dress law, Schwimmer said. This issue arose in a recent lawsuit brought against Eco Manufacturing by Honeywell. Eco Manufacturing was looking to make a thermostat similar in appearance to Honeywell's well-known circular model. Honeywell's round thermostat formerly was protected by two patents that had expired. Honeywell then made a trade dress argument and the court held that because the thermostat was round for functional reasons, anyone in the field should be able to copy that design.
While some small businesses have had major victories in the courtroom, litigation may be avoided all together if entrepreneurs do their research and make sure their intellectual property is protected.

Related Articles
  Protecting Your Ideas
  Intellectual Property – The 3 Branches: Copyrights, Patents & Trademarks
  Management of Intellectual Property- Finding your Forgotten Business Asset.
  Appealing Your Property Taxes
  Trademark Law India

Article Tags: abstract properties, ashburn virginia, chewy vuiton, copyright infringement laws, david vs goliath, dog lovers, goliath battle, haute diggity dog, intellectual property law, judge paul, niemeyer, patent trademark, pet boutique, pet product, physical appearance, principal owner, product business, trade dress, trademark dilution revision, trademark dilution revision act



Related Forum Posts
Re: Ideas For Business - Lucy, Visit ttc.ca for info on the Vendor license to operate on TTC Property only. If you plan on not operating on TTC property you will not need this. I would recommend Nathan Philips on Friday afternoons to catch the Lunch time crowd - Tell me when you plan on performing - I will attend as i work right beside Nathan Philips. I forgot about Yonge/Dundas Square - This place is packed everyday during lunch and after work hours. I can attend to watch you there 'cos I work close to that area as well.
how much for a franchise fee? - Dear Colleague There is no easy answer to this question. Things to consider: [list=] The sizeof the Franchise Clent base Expected Turnover Intellectual Property costs (recoup) Number of Franchises Number of employees Original Set up costs Franchise admin costs An example: A franchise that I was involved in setting was to a simple "lawn mowing/home repair" franchise. The Franchise included national/local advertising - preparation of client lists - general admin - central accounting etc The Franchise involved 300-500 clients - and an annual turnover of about $300,000 . The annual franchise fee was $30,000. Hope that this gives you some idea Take care Ian[/list]
Is this copyright infringement? - Hi TheAnonymousMan, From the resources you've provided, it looks like I'll just have to take my own set of pictures at live tennis events for my site. But The Canadian Intellectual Property Office's [i:1smac7qr]A Guide To Copyrights[/i:1smac7qr] states that "The Copyright Act provides that any 'fair dealing' with a work for purposes of private study or research, or for criticism, review or news reporting is not infringement. However, in the case of criticism, review, or news reporting, the user is required to give the source and the author's, performer's, sound recording maker's or broadcaster's name, if known" (6). So if I wanted to report news on Maria Sharapova or make a comment about her, would using an image from her official website be ok if I simply attached a link back to her site (i.e. I gave credit to wherever I got the image)?
The Game Inventor's Guidebook - by Brian Tinsman, 2002 I checked this out of my local library today and its pretty interesting... didn't address what I wanted to know, which was how to actually design an online gaming system (indeed this doesn't cover online games at all), but for board games etc. it's pretty good. Here's the TOC: 1. How they diid it: Trivial Pursuit Magic, the Gathering Dungeons & Dragons Pokemon Trading Card Game Interview with an inventor Interview with a publisher 2. How the industry works 1. What's in it for you 2. How new games happen 3. Anatomy of a publisher 4. Markets for games 3. Games and companies you should know 1. Mass market games you should know 2. Mass market companies you should know 3. Hobby games you should know 4. Hobby companies you should know 5. American specialty games and companies you should know 6. European specialty games and companies you should know 4. Self publishing 1. What am I getting into 2. Before you print 3. After you print 5. Selling a game step by step 1. How to invent a game 2. Game design 3. Game development 4. Targeting publishers 5. Before you submit 6. Eight submission strategies 7. Contacting publishers 8. Protecting your property 9. What to do if they don't say yes 10. What to do if they do say yes! 11. The game industry's dirty little secret 6. Resources and examples Publishers and mnufacturers Distributors Brokers Game conventions and trade shows Industry publications Sample query letter Sample record of disclosure Sample licensing agreement Sample option agreement
Re: Template of Service Agreement/Contractor Agreement - Shimmy- I, too, would be happy to share my template contract for a service provider. But beware, a template agreement may not be sufficient to properly address your needs. Some key differences between Employees and Service Providers: 1. Tax Status. Employers are responsible for withholding tax on employee's earnings. Independent Contractors are responsible for reporting their income/taxes. There is a significant reporting burden and liability associated with this. 2. Confidentiality/Intellectual Property. Often times, employee handbooks will specify an employees confidentiality obligations and many states impute a duty of loyalty. Contractors are under no such obligations absent a written agreement. Same thing for IP/Creative works. The copyright Act draws a sharp and significant distinction between employees and contractors when it comes to ownership of creative works. 3. Liability for tortious acts. Generally an employer is liable for the tortious acts of its employees under the theory of respondeat superior. An entity hiring a contractor may/may not be liable, but without a written agreement for the contractor to indemnify/defend the hiring entity, their may be little recourse against the contractor. There are many other subtle differences too numerous to mention. I hope you find this helpful.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

The State of the Sustainable Furniture Industry

Gas bills go up by 18% can we take any more

Sales Courage and Resilience

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.