The False Economy of “In-House”
The False Economy of “In-House”
A false economy is where a price seems to be better than it really is. Consider the classic example that most people face at some point in their lives: When the car is leaking oil it can seem like a hassle to bring the car in to the shop and the potentially high cost of a new gasket and oil filter can seem prohibitive. So, the vehicle owner instead just tops up with oil every week.
It seems cheaper: A dollar or two for oil versus quite a bit more for a gasket and filter. And yet, that dollar or two adds up fast. And add in the time it takes to buy oil. This is a classic false economy: the idea that something is cheaper simply because it seems cheaper at first glance.
And yet, as you drill down into the real numbers, the true economic picture becomes clearer.
The car isn’t the only place this happens. It happens in business all the time. Businesses that still operate under the “old school” notion of having in-house staff to do the work are the ones suffering from the false economy. They hire in-house staff because they might pay them $15/hour (to use a nice round number for an example). They think they’re saving money instead of hiring an outsource service provider at $20/hour (again, to use a nice, round number).
But they don’t consider the other costs: Office equipment. Office overhead (like light, heat, power, etc.). Benefits. Bonuses and incentives.
Or the other costs that aren’t quantified but come with the territory: Coffee breaks, washroom breaks, lunch breaks. Limited productivity for the first hour in the morning and the last hour of the afternoon. Limited productivity for the entire Monday morning and the entire Friday afternoon. Office romances. Use of the telephone for personal calls. Who is stealing all the paper clips? And who answers the phones on the weekend (because it’s so hard to find an employee who wants to work Saturday)? And what happens if there isn’t a lot of work one week? They’re paid to twiddle their thumbs just in case the phone rings.
This is the true cost of doing business with in-house employees. But for the same dollar figure (or just a little more), business owners can get an outsource service provider that actually costs much less: They bill for the time they work and nothing more. There are no office or overhead expenses. They scale with your business needs, so if there’s no work, you don’t pay them (and if they phone rings, they’re “on the clock” for the phone call then off the clock after it’s done).
Many businesses have accepted outsourcing in the past for highly specialized work that couldn’t be done in-house; often work that was a one-off project like a website or the design of a new company logo. But more and more businesses are realizing that many of their activities can be delegated outside of the company at a much lower cost than if they were done in-house.
So, if you’re a business owner, it’s time to consider whether your business philosophy is motivated by a false economy that incorrectly quantifies costs, or by a true economy that appreciates the real costs associated with employees and the lower costs associated with outsourced staff.
The False Economy of InHouse - To learn more about this author, visit Heather Villa's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Free Download - Nine Tips for a More Successful Business By Heather Villa |
The False Economy of "In-House"
A false economy is where a price seems to be better than it really is. Consider the classic example that most people face at some point in their lives: When the car is leaking oil it can seem like a hassle to bring the car in to the shop and the potentially high cost of a new gasket and oil filter can seem prohibitive. So, the vehicle owner instead just tops up with oil every week.
It seems cheaper: A dollar or two for oil versus quite a bit more for a gasket and filter. And yet, that dollar or two adds up fast. And add in the time it takes to buy oil. This is a classic false economy: the idea that something is cheaper simply because it seems cheaper at first glance.
And yet, as you drill down into the real numbers, the true economic picture becomes clearer.
The car isn’t the only place this happens. It happens in business all the time. Businesses that still operate under the “old school” notion of having in-house staff to do the work are the ones suffering from the false economy. They hire in-house staff because they might pay them $15/hour (to use a nice round number for an example). They think they’re saving money instead of hiring an outsource service provider at $20/hour (again, to use a nice, round number).
But they don’t consider the other costs: Office equipment. Office overhead (like light, heat, power, etc.). Benefits. Bonuses and incentives.
Or the other costs that aren’t quantified but come with the territory: Coffee breaks, washroom breaks, lunch breaks. Limited productivity for the first hour in the morning and the last hour of the afternoon. Limited productivity for the entire Monday morning and the entire Friday afternoon. Office romances. Use of the telephone for personal calls. Who is stealing all the paper clips? And who answers the phones on the weekend (because it’s so hard to find an employee who wants to work Saturday)? And what happens if there isn’t a lot of work one week? They’re paid to twiddle their thumbs just in case the phone rings.
This is the true cost of doing business with in-house employees. But for the same dollar figure (or just a little more), business owners can get an outsource service provider that actually costs much less: They bill for the time they work and nothing more. There are no office or overhead expenses. They scale with your business needs, so if there’s no work, you don’t pay them (and if they phone rings, they’re “on the clock” for the phone call then off the clock after it’s done).
Many businesses have accepted outsourcing in the past for highly specialized work that couldn’t be done in-house; often work that was a one-off project like a website or the design of a new company logo. But more and more businesses are realizing that many of their activities can be delegated outside of the company at a much lower cost than if they were done in-house.
So, if you’re a business owner, it’s time to consider whether your business philosophy is motivated by a false economy that incorrectly quantifies costs, or by a true economy that appreciates the real costs associated with employees and the lower costs associated with outsourced staff.
The False Economy of InHouse - To learn more about this author, visit Heather Villa's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. |
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Heather's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Green Realestate CSS Template Non Disclosure Agreement Networking Royally Quadruple Your Business Canadian Leadership |
|
 | ||
 |
Write The PR
Press Release Builder | |
 |
Top 50 SEO Posts - 2007
Top SEO Posts of the Year | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||