"Paving a road to hell." Strong words, aren't they? As a
theologian, I think I have sufficient qualifications to speak to that
subject, though. Furthermore, midlife emerges as that period of a
person's life where he or she can be most prone to create that painful
pathway. No doubt, you've often heard the saying that the road to hell
is paved with good intentions. I think that more often than not,
however, the road to hell is paved with cowardice. People — good
people — of various religious persuasions have allowed themselves to be
seduced by the graphical images with which our Judeo-Christian (and
even Muslim) cultures have provided us in an attempt to illustrate the
pains of hell. What emerges from taking these images literally is a
laughable caricature of the truth that all of these traditions are
struggling to convey.
The fundamental essence of hell lies in an absolute isolation. In their attempt to transform the lives of criminals, the Quakers who designed the original penitentiary system (a place where wrong-doers could do penance
and thereby reform) envisioned them as places where men and women would
spend time in solitude and contemplation. Instead the total isolation
that these people experience frequently drove them mad. We humans are
at the core social beings; even infants deprived of social contact (and
touch) will die. The hell that we create for ourselves and upon which
the descriptions of perdition are based is a state of utter aloneness.
Some have said, "If I'm going to hell, I'll have a lot of good
company." On the contrary: in hell there would be no "good company" . .
. in fact, there would be no company at all!
Why am I bringing up what are essentially philosophical and
theological speculations in an article about midlife? Whether hell as a
state in the afterlife exists or not is surely debatable. What's not
open to question, however, is that people can too easily create for
themselves a hell on earth by succumbing to their fears — particularly
their subconscious fears. I think that's the reason why
Socrates said, "The unexamined life is not worth living." Hell begins
when we allow ourselves to be victimized by our subconscious fears and
where it ends, well . . . who knows? How hard is it, after all to look
deeply at yourself in the mirror? Whom do you see there? Do you
register a shock every time you see yourself as you really are, rather
than that self you imagine yourself to be as you face the world? For
most people reading this today, you're not 20 years old anymore. The
reality of aging is there for everyone (but you) to ponder whenever
they see you. How does that make you feel?
If you're holding on
to that image you have of the 20-year-old (and who isn't), what are you
holding on to, and why? From conception until death (and, I'm
convinced, beyond), our human existence, mirroring the evolution of the
universe itself, is characterized by one factor: growth.
We can (and often do) stop or stunt our growth, but we can never
reverse it. 168 hours of opportunity pass by us every week, regardless
of how we choose to use or waste it. In this universe, at least, time
seems to move inexorably forward. As we grow, however, we experience
two fundamental flows of energy: at times we acquire; at other times,
we relinquish. It's the ebb and flow of every life that bouys up our
growth experience like the tides. Youth is designed for acquisition:
allowing us to gain whatever we need to sustain and foster our life
energies as we grow. Aging, on the other hand, is marked by
relinquishment. The principle lesson of the whole of life consists of
learning to let go.
Midlife — at whatever age it may come —
represents a tipping point in your growth: the point where acquisition
steps back and allows relinquishment to take center stage. This is the
way life has to be, because acquisition serves as the support to
growth, not its destiny. Our true destiny as human beings
consists in transitioning into mature spiritual beings. All of our
youth, all of our acquisitions, even our physical existence itself
serves only to support and enable that process to progress. Our culture
has it all wrong, but Robert Browning got it remarkably right in his
poem, Rabbi Ben Ezra, when he wrote:
Grow old along with me!
The best is yet to be,
The last of life, for which the first was made:
Our times are in His hand
Who saith ‘A whole I planned,
Youth shows but half; trust God: see all, nor be afraid!’
I
highly recommend that you read the poem in its entirety, because it
makes my point abundantly clear. Carrie Pierce, who was guest on my
internet radio program recently talked about our culture's worship of
youth. That made me wonder. I'm starting to believe that it's not so
much a 'worship' as an idolatry: replacing the essential with the
peripheral out of fear.You see, in order for someone to be able to set
aside the peripheral and embrace the essential, he or she must give up,
once and for all, the illusion (and delusion) of self-sufficiency.
It's
not until we humans reach the point where our best-laid plans have
failed, where all the security we have so carefully amassed has proven
useless, when all our striving to maintain our physical strength and
beauty turned to vanity under the glare of bright lights or the
challenge of a long and steep flight of stairs, when all those personal
flaws that we've so carefully hidden from the world appear for all to
see, that we begin to acknowledge the truth about ourselves: our true
destiny lies within and in relationship with others. Paradise (now and
hereafter) lies in our interdependence. An old (and favorite) saying of
mine goes like this: Heaven would be hell for a godless person.
The world's greatest prayer is composed of four letters: 'help!' Isn't
it our own cowardice (our fear of admitting our dependency) that keeps
us from uttering that prayer? Cowardice that prompts us to keep up
appearances so that the outside gives the lie to what's really
happening within? If it's our secrets that keep us sick, then isn't
cowardice the disease?
And, the road to hell — living forever alone — is paved, not with good intentions, but with self-reliance.